It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: growler
a reply to: Jonjonj
One would have to be a complete moron to think that Trump came to power with the objective of destroying the media in the hope of instituting some kind of right-wing caliphate.
declaring himself on tape bragging of rape as fake news and the media that carried the story as untrustworthy while, as has been proven he pushed the seth rich lie and told people to view fox, breitbart and infowars as bastions of truth.
in no way is he pressing people to trust far right sources...
ffs
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: burntheships
I read every email you linked.
I didn't see anything in any of them that remotely substantiated the title of this thread. And we're now three pages and 20 flags....
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: Greven
Please cite the collusion in the emails. I do not see it.
Right here!
media.aclj.org...
This was collusion, illegal and it was part of election fraud!
originally posted by: burntheships
REPORT: Lynch Colluded with WaPo, NYTimes to Bury Tarmac Meeting Story
The documents, part of a hundred-page document dump by the DOJ, appear to show reporters from the Washington Post working with the Clinton campaign as well as Loretta Lynch’s office to tamp-down stories relating to the former Attorney General’s infamous meeting with Bill Clinton. The WaPo journalist, speaking of the tarmac meeting, told DOJ officials “I’m hoping to put it to rest.” A reporter from the New York Times made similar statements, saying he was being “pressed into service” and was forced to cover the story.
Hi Melanie,
I'm a White House correspondent at the NYT, and I've been pressed into service to write about the questions being raised by the Attorney General's meeting with Bill Clinton. Could you let me know what DoJ and the AG have said specifically about this meeting, and whether she believes it constitutes a conflict of interest, given the ongoing email investigation?
Hey Melanie (Newman) and Kevin (Lewis)-
Any chance one of you could give mea call for another, hopefully quick, conversation on this AG-Clinton meeting? My editors are still pretty interested in it, and I'm hoping I can put it to rest by answering just a few more questions about how the meeting came about - who approached who, and how did they realize they were in the same place?
Many thanks,
Matt Zapotosky | The Washington Post
A Justice Department spokeswoman provided transcripts of Lynch’s comments on the matter at public news conferences but declined to comment further.
(from Melanie Newman)
It would be much appreciated if you removed the "spox did not return calls for comment"
(from Matt Zapotosky)
I updated the last graph to take that out, reflect that you willingly provided transcripts and added a bit about career prosecutors. Thanks for reaching out - next time I'll get at you diretly. Again, just figured since Kevin was with her and operating three hors earlier than us he'd be better in this case.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: burntheships
Collusion by whom?
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Greven
LOL
They had trouble containing the election damage.
This one got the best of them.
And there was nobody sending them messages (yet) to tell them what to write and "report".
originally posted by: Gryphon66
It's amazing that some of the folks here who can so easily deny the clear fact that the White House collaborated with Fox News on the Seth Rich nonsense are so utterly DESPERATE to try to make something out of normal communications with the Press.
originally posted by: burntheships
While I can't say I am really shocked,
I can say the rule of law during The Obama era
was subverted for political gain by the Democratic Party.