It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Grambler
Being anti-Trump isn't being partisan. At this point, it's common sense.
Yes we know, you are all for the intelligence services committing felonies to overthrow the elected leader of the country.
But you are also the person who felt that Berkeley rioters had a constitutional right to riot and punch political opponents, so no big surprise.
Umm, ok.
If you could point out where I've ever said I support intelligence agencies committing felonies to overthrow the president, that'd be great.
Putting words in other people's mouth doesn't make them correct..
I said the intelligence agencies if they were leaking this info (which is a felony) would be acting partisan.
You say that is just common sense, implying its not a big deal.
Or if you would like to clarify and condemn these partisan leaks, thats fine by me.
Why do you assume the leaks have anything to do with partisanship? Is it that hard to believe there are people who's dislike for Trump has nothing to do with being Republican or Democrat?
Criticism doesn't equal partisanship, despite the narratives on /pol telling you otherwise.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Grambler
Being anti-Trump isn't being partisan. At this point, it's common sense.
Yes we know, you are all for the intelligence services committing felonies to overthrow the elected leader of the country.
But you are also the person who felt that Berkeley rioters had a constitutional right to riot and punch political opponents, so no big surprise.
Umm, ok.
If you could point out where I've ever said I support intelligence agencies committing felonies to overthrow the president, that'd be great.
Putting words in other people's mouth doesn't make them correct..
I said the intelligence agencies if they were leaking this info (which is a felony) would be acting partisan.
You say that is just common sense, implying its not a big deal.
Or if you would like to clarify and condemn these partisan leaks, thats fine by me.
Why do you assume the leaks have anything to do with partisanship? Is it that hard to believe there are people who's dislike for Trump has nothing to do with being Republican or Democrat?
Criticism doesn't equal partisanship, despite the narratives on /pol telling you otherwise.
But we are not talking about criticism are we? We are talking about felony leaks.
Perhaps you would like to take this time to condemn these leaks rather than make excuses for them?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
But doing that would shatter the illusion! Best to focus on the messenger rather than the message to avoid that altogether.
Why are you just repeating what the MSM wants you to talk about.
Can't you see you are falling for what they want?
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Grambler
I don't watch the MSM or TV at all so I'm not falling for anything they're throwing at people, though I find it ironic that the side that has adopted such MSM buzzwords as snowflake, safe space, triggered, SJW, fake news, etc. is trying to accuse anyone of falling for the MSM narrative.
Not directed at you in particular, just a general statement.