It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wikileaks Tweets New Bombshell Video of Rod Wheeler Recording On Seth Rich Investigation

page: 9
73
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 02:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

It is an actual court document.

If you like the sand pit your head is buried in,
that is your choice. I won't dig you out.




posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Krazysh0t

It is an actual court document.

If you like the sand pit your head is buried in,
that is your choice. I won't dig you out.


It's a court document posted on your shady website. Meaning they could have easily forged it. Get a document from a public records source and I'll change my opinion.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone

Ah, the usual suspect. What sources do you prefer? CNN? Snopes? WaPo?



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 02:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

It is not "my" website, such drama.
Good grief.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Whatever. I just want a trustworthy source. Not sure why it has to be like pulling teeth to get a credible source.
edit on 3-8-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 02:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burntheships

Whatever. I just want a trustworthy source. Not sure why it has to be like pulling teeth to get a credible source.


What about the video?



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 02:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burntheships

Whatever. I just want a trustworthy source. Not sure why it has to be like pulling teeth to get a credible source.


What about the video?

What about the video? That isn't a courtroom. So what is going on in that video isn't presiding over a lawsuit. Are you telling me that you are satisfied with such weak connections in regards to your evidence collection?
edit on 3-8-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 03:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: alphabetaone

Some people see a pit of sand in which to bury thier head.
Others see verifiable facts, and research them.


I agree. But researching them with the tools available to the average citizen is often of limited value, and is precisely what creates fake news in the first place. Conjecture gets mixed in with opinion further mixed with bias and finally with outright fabrications and then claimed on these party affiliation website startups as breaking news. Then Alex Jones of the world and Breitbarts of the world, grab a hold of it and run with it as though it's undeniable truth. Only need to look as far as a Fox News retraction and it's backstory to see why professional journalism is not only needed but invaluable.

Proof that that threads premise is of little value? Easy... you can't prove beyond a doubt that it's accurate any more than I can beyond a doubt prove it's inaccurate...in the end, it just boils down to what you believe and THAT is of very little value.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: HorizonFall
a reply to: alphabetaone

Ah, the usual suspect. What sources do you prefer? CNN? Snopes? WaPo?


"Usual suspect"? I strongly suggest you rethink that.

I'm not asking for a source on anything. I'm saying I'm unwilling to accept THAT one as proof of a thing.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone

I tend to put credence in court documents, especially
When they are stamped from within.

As that one is.

If you are waiting on CNN or MSN to report it, good luck.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 07:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: alphabetaone

I tend to put credence in court documents, especially
When they are stamped from within.

As that one is.

If you are waiting on CNN or MSN to report it, good luck.



Ok well, post a link to the governmental website that houses that public record document and I will take it from there.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: AnkhMorpork


What IS known: D.C. Police found no evidence to suggest it was other than a botched robbery.



What evidence suggests it was obviously a "botched robbery"? The lack of a gun, killer, motive ect? Wouldn't a professional hit be executed to look like a botched robbery? A real Hitman leaves no trace.
Please tell me what makes it a botched robbery?



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 08:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
Please tell me what makes it a botched robbery?


There is no evidence to support that other than the fact several robberies occurred in the area over time. Other than that coincidence there is nothing else.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 08:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

You could probably say that about any retail area in most Cities. www.trulia.com...



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 09:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
Please tell me what makes it a botched robbery?


Ask D.C. Police...it's their investigation, not mine.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 10:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone

Ok well, post a link to the governmental website that houses that public record document and I will take it from there.


It's not quite that easy, otherwise I would have.

It is a subscription service known as PACER.

It is not free unless your a party to the suit,
and no way to prove any more than what is at the link
unless I were to try and screenshot, which would just get
dismissed as much.

The Pacer Stamp can be seen on the documents
that were linked earlier.



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 11:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
It's not quite that easy, otherwise I would have.



Well, I imagine it's going to be incredibly difficult seeing as how there is no reference to a case number. Anyone can fill out an injuction for relief without the requisite data on it to substantiate a desire to go to court. But what you (and Mocking Bird) have provided doesn't even have a case number associated with it....until there is such evidence that can be verified by public records, there never was an actual court proceeding nevermind one that would have required his (or anyones) presence.
edit on 3-8-2017 by alphabetaone because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 3 2017 @ 11:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone


Well, I imagine it's going to be incredibly difficult seeing as how there is no reference to a case number.


On the seven page document, The case number is there in the
PACER stamp on the top of each page, in blue.

www.mockingbirdpaper.com...

edit on 3-8-2017 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-8-2017 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 4 2017 @ 02:36 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Aug, 4 2017 @ 10:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: alphabetaone


Well, I imagine it's going to be incredibly difficult seeing as how there is no reference to a case number.


On the seven page document, The case number is there in the
PACER stamp on the top of each page, in blue.

www.mockingbirdpaper.com...


I've sent an email to Ohio's Southern District Court's clerk in an attempt to ask them if it is/was a valid case. I know PACER isn't some fly-by-night money making website, it's their official electronic court filing system.

While I wait for a response though, I still don't understand how even if this court case is real that Seth Rich plays a part in it anyway. Other than conjecture of course, that he was supposed to be involved in some way.




top topics



 
73
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join