It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ex-Sheriff Joe Arpaio found guilty of criminal contempt

page: 2
33
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Get the bastard to Boot Camp, let's see if he can swallow his own medicine.

After all what goes around, comes around.




posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   
Seems to me the judge overstepped his bounds. The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch enforces the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. A judge can't tell a sheriff how to enforce the law any more than a sheriff can tell a judge how to rule on a case.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom
Seems to me the judge overstepped his bounds. The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch enforces the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. A judge can't tell a sheriff how to enforce the law any more than a sheriff can tell a judge how to rule on a case.

The judge can direct the Sheriff to work within the boundaries of the law.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: InsaneIthorian

Brutal prisons. Can you provide a source? I genuinely would like to read about that...



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
So he'll have to pay for any fine levied against him from his own pocket instead of relying on the people of Arpaio County.


Actually the National Center for Police Defense has picked up his legal tab for him to date. The fine, as I understand it, is likely to be a maximum of $5,000 and regardless of jail time or not, he'll appeal and demand a trial by jury (have fun with that, Arpaio haters... no jury is going to convict him of this).

In other words, he's inconvenienced at worst by this.

More than likely they will convict him because it was the snowbirds that kept him in office. All the prosecuting lawyer would have to do is remind the jury of the millions he has cost that county in lawsuits and his ass will be where it belongs behind bars.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
The judge can direct the Sheriff to work within the boundaries of the law.


Irony: a 9th Circuit judge telling a sheriff who is trying to enforce laws on the books to work within the expectations, not laws, of the seated Administration at the time who refuses to enforce the laws on the books.

The entirety of the 9th should be disbarred and jailed for contempt of common sense.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Get the bastard to Boot Camp, let's see if he can swallow his own medicine.

After all what goes around, comes around.

Maybe we should start a gofundme to buy smokes for his first BF.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Maybe? To be honest I care little about the rights of illegals. But fact is a corrupt tyrant has been removed so hardly going to shed a tear.

He ruled his little fiefdom by corruption, fear and tyranny and he fell to corruption so kinda fitting end for him really.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: buster2010
The judge can direct the Sheriff to work within the boundaries of the law.


Irony: a 9th Circuit judge telling a sheriff who is trying to enforce laws on the books to work within the expectations, not laws, of the seated Administration at the time who refuses to enforce the laws on the books.

The entirety of the 9th should be disbarred and jailed for contempt of common sense.

What that fascist wanted to do went against the Constitution that's why he and Arizona got shut down. So do you think that Constitution should be thrown aside when it doesn't fit their agenda?



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:21 PM
link   
a reply to: buster2010

I don't envy the American Penal/Prison system.

You guys do some hard time.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
More than likely they will convict him because it was the snowbirds that kept him in office. All the prosecuting lawyer would have to do is remind the jury of the millions he has cost that county in lawsuits and his ass will be where it belongs behind bars.


And all Joe's defense needs to do is remind the jury of the hundreds of millions he saved by not constructing new prisons to handle additional need (versus putting up a $20,000 additional tent, slab, and accommodations) and the lowest spending per inmate of any prison system in America. He cost Maricopa millions in lawsuits while saving the tax payer hundreds of millions... that's a solid trade off and a good deal for the tax payers' money.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: InsaneIthorian

Brutal prisons. Can you provide a source? I genuinely would like to read about that...


Here is a list

Some of its just liberal whining but there are also some prettys messed up things.

For a start his disregard of due process is shocking.

But the fact he lets sex offenders slide while clamping down on non violent crime is shocking.

And the conditions in his jails are dangrous. Sure prison should be harsh but not deadly.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
So he'll have to pay for any fine levied against him from his own pocket instead of relying on the people of Arpaio County.


Actually the National Center for Police Defense has picked up his legal tab for him to date. The fine, as I understand it, is likely to be a maximum of $5,000 and regardless of jail time or not, he'll appeal and demand a trial by jury (have fun with that, Arpaio haters... no jury is going to convict him of this).

In other words, he's inconvenienced at worst by this.

More than likely they will convict him because it was the snowbirds that kept him in office. All the prosecuting lawyer would have to do is remind the jury of the millions he has cost that county in lawsuits and his ass will be where it belongs behind bars.



Snowbirds don't flock til after thanksgiving so that myth won't fly.

Collage students is another issue.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:27 PM
link   
This is what happens when you try exposing Obama.
a reply to: Xcalibur254



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

So the luxurious Mesa Hilton facility was not constructed under his tenure?



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Left logic.

LEO's doing their job=lawbreaker.

Illegal alien raping old ladies in our country and getting released over and over again = super hero to the left.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: buster2010
More than likely they will convict him because it was the snowbirds that kept him in office. All the prosecuting lawyer would have to do is remind the jury of the millions he has cost that county in lawsuits and his ass will be where it belongs behind bars.


And all Joe's defense needs to do is remind the jury of the hundreds of millions he saved by not constructing new prisons to handle additional need (versus putting up a $20,000 additional tent, slab, and accommodations) and the lowest spending per inmate of any prison system in America. He cost Maricopa millions in lawsuits while saving the tax payer hundreds of millions... that's a solid trade off and a good deal for the tax payers' money.

Prove this hundreds of millions saved. It cost them more building the tent city and leaving the jail mostly empty except for the dogs that lived there.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: buster2010
More than likely they will convict him because it was the snowbirds that kept him in office. All the prosecuting lawyer would have to do is remind the jury of the millions he has cost that county in lawsuits and his ass will be where it belongs behind bars.


And all Joe's defense needs to do is remind the jury of the hundreds of millions he saved by not constructing new prisons to handle additional need (versus putting up a $20,000 additional tent, slab, and accommodations) and the lowest spending per inmate of any prison system in America. He cost Maricopa millions in lawsuits while saving the tax payer hundreds of millions... that's a solid trade off and a good deal for the tax payers' money.


And the prosecution can point out the corruption of:
arresting political opponents.
Misuse of government expenses.
Failure to enforce laws on sexual offences
Failure to follow due process
Preferential and unfair treatment of prisoners who are friends of the sheriff.

Yeah he may be cheap but rights are priceless.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: thesaneone

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
So he'll have to pay for any fine levied against him from his own pocket instead of relying on the people of Arpaio County.


Actually the National Center for Police Defense has picked up his legal tab for him to date. The fine, as I understand it, is likely to be a maximum of $5,000 and regardless of jail time or not, he'll appeal and demand a trial by jury (have fun with that, Arpaio haters... no jury is going to convict him of this).

In other words, he's inconvenienced at worst by this.

More than likely they will convict him because it was the snowbirds that kept him in office. All the prosecuting lawyer would have to do is remind the jury of the millions he has cost that county in lawsuits and his ass will be where it belongs behind bars.



Snowbirds don't flock til after thanksgiving so that myth won't fly.

Collage students is another issue.

They vote in February so it does fly.



posted on Jul, 31 2017 @ 05:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
What that fascist wanted to do went against the Constitution that's why he and Arizona got shut down. So do you think that Constitution should be thrown aside when it doesn't fit their agenda?


Hilarious! It only "violated the Constitution" in the eyes of an activist court who were pushing an agenda of their own. Arpaio was enforcing state law, which is what he was sworn in to do... not appease a wilting federal administration which depended on illegals entering the county and, more importantly, illegally voting in that county to ramrod agendas through the system.



new topics

top topics



 
33
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join