Trump the Anti-Christ

originally posted by: Gothmog

Trump the Anti-Christ

If Trump is the Anti-Christ , he is doing a lousy job at it....
The Anti-Christ will bring world peace - Epic Failure
The Anti-Christ will be loved and respected by the entire world - Epic Failure
The Anti-Christ will bring on the Abomination of Desolation buy standing on the Temple Mount and proclaiming himself "King of King , and Lord of Lords" - With 1,000s of irate Muslims there , I would advise against that at this point.

Maybe anti-christ old helper.

originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: PublicOpinion
In order to be the antichrist, Trump needs to be setting himself against Christ. That's basic. No sign of that yet.
On the other hand, the movement of an embassy from one city to another fulfils no prophecies that I know of.

How exactly do you know this?

The making of the Anti-Christ:

originally posted by: CreationBro
"In order to be the antichrist, Trump needs to be setting himself against Christ. That's basic. No sign of that yet.
On the other hand, the movement of an embassy from one city to another fulfils no prophecies that I know of."
How exactly do you know this?

I know the first point from the definition of "antichrist",as provided by the New Testament and basic etymology. I explained this in more detail in later posts, and I've done a thread on the subject.
On the second point, I am familiar enough with the content of Old Testament prophecy (which is the kind of prophecy they would be talking about) to know when a particular item is not there. In this case, "a king will move an embassy from one city to another".

originally posted by: SpeakerofTruth
The institution of Christianity and Christ are NOT one and the same... Sorry, to burst your bubble there, fella, but.

Look again. I was not equating Christ with an institution. I was equating Christ with Christian belief. No need to apologise for something you haven't done.

a reply to: PublicOpinion

I think the way he lives,his platform and his current upholding of laws,he would be the complete opposite of the Anti Christ,that is more fitting of the Democratic socialism,and their poor morals

originally posted by: BlueJacket
a reply to: St Udio

Seriously...you think this crap is real...AND Think you are a discriminatory authority in this fables regards?

the term might be 'Aficionado' rather than 'authority'
see:

a·fi·ci·o·na·do
[əˌfiSHəˈnädō, əˌfisyəˈnädō]
NOUN
a person who is very knowledgeable and enthusiastic about an activity, subject, or pastime:

Note: the word 'very' is too strong a superlative, except for maybe egomaniacs, so I edited 'very' out, tyvm

I just 'put out there' my discerned perspective, which includes all the twist/turns/allusions found in prophecies or premonitions/forecasts... from all sources...

I eat up the convoluted world of the sometimes forewarned Future and try to decipher the mostly shadowy warnings from our chronological 'past'

Why do you resist so much...

Oh FFS... first "Bush" was the antichrist, then Clinton, then Obama, now Trump? Rinse & repeat...

a reply to: PublicOpinion

If anyone has actually read any scripture revolving around the term "anti-christ" they will learn it is not a single physical person, but a term for those who are literally "anti-christ".

So funny people so assuredly tossing around the term "THE ANTICHRIST" but only know it through word of mouth and continued superstition through the ages...

a reply to: DISRAELI

I know the first point from the definition of "antichrist",as provided by the New Testament and basic etymology.

But American dispensationalists and other Zionist Christians don't go by the etymology. They have decided to use the Anti-Christ as the name for their end times false Christ.

A big example is their 70th week character from Daniel 9:27. The maker of the covenant of peace which doesn't last. Kushner actually fits that description because he's the guy selected to "bring peace" while he's actually funding illegal Jewish outposts in the West bank.

I am familiar enough with the content of Old Testament prophecy (which is the kind of prophecy they would be talking about) to know when a particular item is not there. In this case, "a king will move an embassy from one city to another".

Here you go:

Micah 4:1But in the latter days, it will happen that the mountain of Yahweh's temple will be established on the top of the mountains, and it will be exalted above the hills; and peoples will stream to it.

2Many nations will go and say, "Come, and let us go up to the mountain of Yahweh, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths."

How does a nation go to a city? Embassies. And visits by heads of state, such as:

Zechariah 8:22Yes, many peoples and strong nations will come to seek Yahweh of Armies in Jerusalem, and to entreat the favor of Yahweh."

There are other verse that mention kings specifically.

There is a version of future events that real Biblical scholars may accept. Then there is a popularized version that is pushed at the common people. The second version is probably more in line with the context of this thread.

The reality is that these things can all take place without any divine intervention at all; money, political capital, and military force can do it all.

American Christian and Jewish Zionists can actually set all this up. Undivided Jerusalem means a Parliamentary decree declaring the annexation of East Jerusalem as part of Israel. The Palestinians living there would instantly become illegal aliens to be deported. From what I've seen of Trump so far, I do believe he would accept that and instruct his UN ambassador to veto any Security Council resolution that may arise.

U.S. political arena is way Zionist.

a reply to: pthena
Not being American or dispensationalist, I'm not restrained by that viewpoint. I can protest against the hi-jacking of Christian concepts.
In fact I'm currently drafting, for future use, a series of threads offering a non-literal, New Testament-centred, version of the "return to the land" prophecies. I'm only online now as a way of putting off the task.

a reply to: PublicOpinion


Wait I am confused, I thought it was his son in law........

All was put in motion under President Obama not Trump.Now Trump is trapped in it.
Starting to believe the Pope and Rome and the deep state will usher in the Anti-Christ.

Because they have the most power and control and advanced technology in the world.They want China and Russia to join entire world order.

Anti-Christ? No.
Time traveler? Probably.

I'm STILL waiting for Obama to make HIS anti-Christ move...

Ya'll said HE was the anti-Christ...

And others Said Bush Jr. was....

originally posted by: DanteGaland
I'm STILL waiting for Obama to make HIS anti-Christ move...

Ya'll said HE was the anti-Christ...

And others Said Bush Jr. was....

I wouldn't count Obama out yet.

You want an actual candidate for the anti christ? Look no further than Emmanuel Macron of france

"Emmanuel Macron Consolidates Power, Desires To Govern Like "Jupiter"

Holy cow! The snowflakes still can't come to terms with Trump as President! Now he's the AntiChrist even though he just had a confab with religious leaders who prayed for him in his office. He didn't burst into flames during the prayers, so I'm guessing he's not the AntiChrist.

C'mon you sad sacks. Get your own party in order. That is why you lost and will lose agian. You lack focus and real world skills.

a reply to: c2oden

Trump is NOT John Titor.

Worst anti Christ ever.....