It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Trump-Russia Narrative is Dying. Why?

page: 29
40
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

You wanted to talk about Seth ... but not now?

Why? You can't put up even an attempt at proof?

Saaad.




posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Prove it? Sure. Here is some evidence. A thread full

There is now audio and video to back up what i say

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

I did, look down. Next post.

Audio and video evidence that the DNC killed Seth Rich for leaking to wiki leaks.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

What evidence do you have?

Others here make wild claims and have nothing.

At least you provided us an opinion piece from a Republican operative and claimed it wa WaPo policy shift ... it wasn't but you tried at least.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

bigleaguepolitics.com...
edit on 8 1 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dudemo5
The Russia story is as big now as it ever was. It gets bigger by the day.

Christ, some people live in a magic bubble of nonsense.

I don't know what the investigation will reveal, if anything. But the information already in the public domain doesn't look good for Trump.

I mean, this is clear. Seriously. What are people in here smoking?


Even Democrats have stopped talking about it - what was once a daily flood of Democrats on TV pushing the narrative is now a trickle from the odd wing nut.
We're now down to the die hards trying to find some wrong in the President advising his son on a press statement.
All the while not a shred of evidence of any crime.
No wonder people are now steering clear and leaving it to the crazies (or should I say emotionally invested that are about to have a lot of egg on their faces)



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

What is your evidence?



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

I did, look down. Next post.

Audio and video evidence that the DNC killed Seth Rich for leaking to wiki leaks.



A link to another ATS thread is not evidence.

Try again.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

What evidence do you have?

Others here make wild claims and have nothing.

At least you provided us an opinion piece from a Republican operative and claimed it wa WaPo policy shift ... it wasn't but you tried at least.


Of crimes committed? None.
The same as you.
I can easily see the very apparent lack of multiple Democrats on TV daily talking about this though and the significant reduction in news stories - both in volume and veracity.

It's almost time to pull the chord, fella. The ground is approaching.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes, the link has the evidence requested.

Read it.

You did already?

What is your evidence of collusion?

That Seth Rich was killed by the DNC because he leaked to wiki leaks and there was no Russian hack?

?

edit on 8 1 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:29 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman
You're confusing things
stay cool

to be fair, cos i'm late to the party
and it's nearly last orders

show me yours first
i'll show you mine


just link
your version like this
Link 1

Link 2

Link 3

My links lead to a gateway of sources
in different languages,

if need be,
to back you up

With all of that in hand,

such wealth of opportunity
to refute your doubters

can you throw me a crumb of your creditable,
non-anonymous,
undeniable proof ?



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

What evidence do you have?

Others here make wild claims and have nothing.

At least you provided us an opinion piece from a Republican operative and claimed it wa WaPo policy shift ... it wasn't but you tried at least.


Of crimes committed? None.
The same as you.
I can easily see the very apparent lack of multiple Democrats on TV daily talking about this though and the significant reduction in news stories - both in volume and veracity.

It's almost time to pull the chord, fella. The ground is approaching.


Yeah, you folks keep repeating things that just don't pan out.

Like this thread, not only is Trump Russia not dying, it's blazing.

Maybe you'd better stop relying on opinion pieces from Republicans for your "predictions"... you know, like your piece from the Washingon Post ... you know, that media outlet that has been claimed here to be a CIA asset?

(With no actual evidence or backup, of course.)

edit on 1-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: soberbacchus

No, she requested the meeting. Check the email chain that Trump jr already released in an act of transparency.



Sure..but you said she was a "Never Trumper"..


Which was a falsehood based on her FB post of a pic of a Never-Trump Rally..


She commented in Russian...US Right-Wing fake News Circles ran with the "She was a never Trumper" story...when her FB post in Russian that accompanied the pic was actually deriding the Never-Trump Protestors.


So you fell for fake news.





Second, it was requested under false pretenses.



How the hell would you know? We don't know what was said in the meeting?

We do know that Trump Jr. first claimed it was a meeting arranged to discuss adoption...Then it was reported that it was a meeting to discuss help from the Russian Government to get his father elected.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Damiel

You were fair, and I will. I think we can have a good conversation.

Let me get home, I am on my phone and need my computer.

If not its from memory.

So give me a couple hours. Ok buddy.

I did actually want to debate this.

Some may come to troll, I came to talk about it.

Let me get home and we're on.

LOL



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes, the link has the evidence requested.

Read it.

You did already?

What is your evidence of collusion?

That Seth Rich was killed by the DNC because he leaked to wiki leaks and there was no Russian hack?

?


So, again, you're making wild claims you can't back up.

Let me know if you're able to come up with something and stop repeating yourself ...




posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Not you.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Nope, how was the information wrong.

What is your evidence of collusion.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

What evidence do you have?

Others here make wild claims and have nothing.

At least you provided us an opinion piece from a Republican operative and claimed it wa WaPo policy shift ... it wasn't but you tried at least.


Of crimes committed? None.
The same as you.
I can easily see the very apparent lack of multiple Democrats on TV daily talking about this though and the significant reduction in news stories - both in volume and veracity.

It's almost time to pull the chord, fella. The ground is approaching.


Yeah, you folks keep repeating things that just don't pan out.

Like this thread, not only is Trump Russia not dying, it's blazing.

Maybe you'd better stop relying on opinion pieces from Republicans for your "predictions"... you know, like your WaPo piece that has been claimed here to be a CIA asset?



Nah - Democrats have dialled it down ten fold. There are a fraction of the stories daily now, and even those stories have no claim of the President colluding with Russia.

Look, I know you are probably the most invested with the most embarrassment coming your way, so I understand why you have to lie to yourself. "Blazing". lol.

Remember it was me who warned you several months ago not to get too emotionally wrapped up in evidence free narratives from the media and politicians. They are abandoning the story and leaving their minions holding the baby.
It's your own fault for not listening.



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:40 PM
link   
and ... adding to the non-dying media coverage of the Trump Russia SCANDAL ...

Progressive think-tank to release 50-page report saying Trump colluded with Russia - The Hill



“We're... trying to convey that it’s time to stop beating around the bush on Trump’s collusion with Russia. There is a mountain of evidence that Trump and his associates colluded with Russia and it’s time to start saying so,” Adam Jentleson, a senior strategic adviser for CAP, told BuzzFeed.
“We think it’s time to be a lot more forward-leading because the evidence is overwhelming.”

The imminent release of the report comes as the special counsel’s probe into Russia’s election meddling and potential ties between Trump campaign staff members and Moscow deepen.


Trump Russia ... alive and well despite the hopes and dreams of Trump lovers everywhere.
edit on 1-8-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Format



posted on Aug, 1 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Your "progressive think tank" source is progressive

They gave their opinion and made predictions.

So, conjecture. Cool.

Like I said.


edit on 8 1 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join