It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Trump-Russia Narrative is Dying. Why?

page: 13
40
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

No he admitted to taking a 15 minute meeting that ended as soon as it was established to be REQUESTED under false pretenses by a foreign operative, never trump activist on amn expired visa, who days later was sitting with Barack Obama and the US Embassador to Russia.

All paid for by the DNC and admitted by them.



What were the so called "false pretenses" that got the meeting again? LOL

As I said, the ever-gullible 55%.




posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes.

Because they were against him before the election and still are since the two party system is a sham and they are all in bed together.

This is news to you oh savage one?

"Whatever" means you cant contest what I say, and are void of any merit in the BS you REPEAT.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:15 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

Are you still trying to segue to Democrats?

Wow. Okay, you're a waste of time.

Off topic is off topic, even in the Pit.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

She said: That she had dirt on clinton.

What she did: She talked about adoption.

False pretenses. Copy?

If she had dirt, he could receive it. Thats not illegal.

If it was illegal to be had, he would have turned it in.

It was a 15 minute meeting. I repeatt that because you sound retarded the way you talk about it.

Do you get this last part?

And that SHE requested it because she was under contract by the DNC? As a foreign intelligence operative running opposition politics in a domestic election....which is a violation of the Hatch act.

YES?


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

No I am making several points about DNC corruption, election fraud, federal high crimes against the state and treason.

All of which you have not even touched upon since you have absolutely no viable counter arguments to them.

Since they are verified and that is why I say it.

EDIT TO ADD:

NEXT.

edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes.

Because they were against him before the election and still are since the two party system is a sham and they are all in bed together.

This is news to you oh savage one?

"Whatever" means you cant contest what I say, and are void of any merit in the BS you REPEAT.



this time last year trump fans were convinced jewish bankers at goldman sachs were at fault for every war ever, are you claiming views change?



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:31 PM
link   
a reply to: growler

We are talking about career politicians from both uni parties.

I dont know what irrelevant thing you are trying to inject here.

I said enough that can be added to, or detracted from.

Do that or all I said stands.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:34 PM
link   
If the Russia thing is dying, why did Mueller just hire 15 attorneys to work on the case?
Link

You don't get the money approved for that amount of new hires without showing reason for it. And despite the 180 degree thinking Trump has convinced his followers to accept as reality, that isn't an indication there's nothing there. Quite the opposite.

You can downplay the investigation(s) into Trump all you want but the reality is that they are growing in manpower and scope by the week. And for someone who publicly bragged about gaming the system, Russia may be the least of his worries when Mueller starts digging through his financial records.

Maybe it isn't Russia, but whatever it is, it's definitely something.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Yeah, because its dying down and they need more help than ever.

A more concerted effort doesnt mean its going swimingly.

People flail when they drown.

EDIT TO ADD:
Good point BTW, it is costing us a fortune huh?

Too bad its all unfounded.

Based off fake intel foreign agents compiled for the DNC in violation of the Hatch act.

I wonder how many poor Democrats that much money could help.

This is why the DNC wants working class money, to waste it on their personal political enemies.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

I looked through last weeks headlines and it seems the narrative hasn't died.

It is simply the weekend.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: underwerks

Yeah, because its dying down and they need more help than ever.

A more concerted effort doesnt mean its going swimingly.

People flail when they drown.

EDIT TO ADD:
Good point BTW, it is costing us a fortune huh?

Too bad its all unfounded.

Based off fake intel foreign agents compiled for the DNC in violation of the Hatch act.


People don't hire more help when something is dying down..




posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Sure they do. They also distance themselves from it publicly like the media is doing as the OP stated.

They were wrong all along. The best thing they can do is admit it and move on.

Try harder to not aim so far off mark next time.

You know.

Like all things Trump, this shot the DNC in the foot.
They look criminal now, not Trump.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

That claim is being made by Jack Burkman of the DNC. Pure farce but hey, that's what they do.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: underwerks

Sure they do. They also distance themselves from it puicly like the media is doing as the OP stated.

They were wrong all along. The best thing they can do is admit it and move on.

Try harder to not aim sp far off mark next time.

You know.


Once again, you don't know that - so stop saying it.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:55 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

That article is from july 8th. More than three weeks ago.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: redtic

I know what has been verified. They claimed much, proved nothing, and revealed their own criminality.

So, yes. As of yet, Trump is still innocent. Without a doubt.

Prove he is not. Prove they were right when they said he was guilty of collusion.

Cant be done.

They were wrong when they said that 8 long months ago.

Last time I checked, they still are.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 07:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: redtic

No I know what has been verified. They claimed much, proved nothing, and revealed their own criminality.

So, yes. As of yet, Trump is still innocent. Without a doubt.

Prove he is not. Prove they were right when they said he was guilty of collusion.

Cant be done.

They were wrong when they said that 8 long months ago.

Last time I checked, they still are.



I can't prove he's guilty, just as much as you can't prove he's innocent. What part of "the results of the investigations are not yet known" do you not understand?



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: redtic

Guess what?

Only you guys have to prove guilt. No one EVER has to be proven innocent.

We all are until proven otherwise.

So do that, or admit you guys were wrong when you said he was guilty.

At the very least YOU can say you dont know.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: underwerks

That article is from july 8th. More than three weeks ago.

Less than a month ago. And?



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 08:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: redtic

Guess what?

Only you guys have to prove guilt. No one EVER has to proven innocent.

We all are until proven other wise.

So do that, or admit you guys were wrong when you said otherwise.

At the very least YOU can say you dont know.



No, "us guys" don't have to do squat - the investigators/lawyers have to prove guilt. And they will if they can. Look up the meaning of the word "presumed".



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join