It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Trump-Russia Narrative is Dying. Why?

page: 10
40
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:40 PM
link   
Next?

Anyone want to actually debate the topic here?

Investigations into Trump and the campaign continue in both chambers of Congress and in the Department of Justice.

The dreams of Trumpkins that this is all just "going away" are frankly horsecrap.

Anybody? Anybody?




posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

We all know Trump took a 50 billion check from Putin. Will that be uncovered? Nop. Congress and Mueller are in the pockets of the big corporate fat cats.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


So wait, your entire premise is that because there are investigations that there must be evidence of illegality?

LOL

Yes shnookum. We are saying its a witch hunt to divert blame away from DNC corruption, illegalities, voter law violations, COLLUSION with an actual foreign power, Hatch violations, sedition charges, treason charges, and a bullet if there is a God.

What is the violation, Russia interfering? Mmmk

So Trump is "Russia"

Collusion. Well, that sounds serious.

What is the evidence?


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

You definitely don't. We tried that. You lost.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

Tagging in, eh?

Did I say that investigations prove that Trump is guilty? No?

Gosh, must be another Tadaman Special Strawman, huh?

It does prove, however, that the collusion (and criminal activities) of the Trump camp are still here though.

Next.
edit on 30-7-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

So, wait

What is the evidence slick?

Next?

LoL

So youre not actually trying to validate any evidence you say exists.

Ok.

I guess everyones counter argument with verifiable information stands.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Gryphon66

You definitely don't. We tried that. You lost.


/yawn



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

So, wait

What is the evidence slick?


Well, skippy, the evidence is that there are still about five ongoing investigations into Trump's collusion with Russia ... ergo, it hasn't "gone away" has it?

Duh.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




Tagging in, eh? 

Did I say that investigations prove that Trump is guilty? No? 




Well, skippy, the evidence is that there are still about five ongoing investigations into Trump's collusion with Russia ... ergo, it hasn't "gone away" has it?


Oh, derp, so the evidence is the investigstions.

Thanks sweet heart.

EXACTLY WHAT I said

NEXT.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Next?

Anyone want to actually debate the topic here?

Investigations into Trump and the campaign continue in both chambers of Congress and in the Department of Justice.

The dreams of Trumpkins that this is all just "going away" are frankly horsecrap.

Anybody? Anybody?


"Trumpkins"? Is that another cute expression like "basket of deplorables"? You know, the cute expression which caused Hillary the election when all the undecideds felt they were labeled "deplorable" just because they didn't want to vote for her?



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

Anyone who is under investigation is automatically guilty, according to Gryphon66.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

Oh, derp, so the evidence is the investigstions.

Thanks sweat heart.

EXACTLY WHAT I said


Jesus, the second string is worse than the varsity.

Look. I'll go s l o w l y

1. Topic of thread: "Trump-Russia narrative is dying"

2. Evidence: Five investigation into the Trump-Russian collusion and other crimes are ongoing.

3. Conclusion ... "Trump-Russia" is not dead or dying ... in fact, it's just getting warmed up.

Did it take that time TaaDaa?



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: tadaman

Anyone who is under investigation is automatically guilty, according to Gryphon66.


Quote it, scooter.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

So, wait

What is the evidence slick?


Well, skippy, the evidence is that there are still about five ongoing investigations into Trump's collusion with Russia ... ergo, it hasn't "gone away" has it?

Duh.


Ok Jackwagon. Five ongoing investigations have produced nothing over the past eight months they've been "ongoing".



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

No no little man.

Answer my question.

What is the evidence NOW?



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:55 PM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

Are you trying to say an expression "cost" Hillary the election?

Is everyone posting from the Trump congregation drunk this afternoon?



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Gryphon66

No no little man.

Answer my question.

What is the evidence NOW?



LOL ...

So, you realized your stupid mistake, eh? What, did you actually read a post?

Post your own evidence goofy; I posted the evidence that negates the entire thread.

Nothing regarding "Trump-Russia" is dead or dying.

(Is there a third-string team that's not sloshed that wants a go?)

EDIT: Terminal boredom reached with the peanut gallery ... try to get some cogent arguments together and I'll check back later.
edit on 30-7-2017 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

So you cant debate worth a dung, have zero evidence to substantiate any claim made, have zero counter arguments to evidence offered up by the detractors, and as of yet have not produced a single thread of validity.

You have spat your vile, uninformed, over opinionated garbage OPINION on anyone who is kind enough to correct your gross disregard for actual fact checking before you totally commit to a false narrative like a statist little bitch.


edit on 7 30 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

What evidence liar.



posted on Jul, 30 2017 @ 05:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: tadaman

Anyone who is under investigation is automatically guilty, according to Gryphon66.


So then Hillary was guilty of disseminating classified emails. And yes it was an "investigation", even though Loretta Lynch told Comey to use the term "matter" instead, as she was instructed by Bill on the airplane visit. At last, a leftist snowflake saying she was guilty after all.



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join