It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


the ultimate rant angaist the extraterrestrial hypothesys

page: 6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 02:25 AM
a reply to: BASSPLYR

Must be Australian!

posted on Aug, 6 2017 @ 04:20 AM
a reply to: myss427

Youd be correct!😊

posted on Aug, 10 2017 @ 06:10 PM

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: underwerks

Why? Does it make all the machines and computers used go away if I do?

A site with no Impressum is hardly trustworthy. They're not even trying why should I?

Math doesn't lie. Either show me where they made a mistake, or accept their conclusion.

The math in the paper is statistics.

Statistics only analyzes the data you use it on. Ever heard what they say about statistics?


posted on Aug, 21 2017 @ 08:00 PM

originally posted by: humanoidlord
today i was going to shown another humanoid encounters story, however i made an very good point angaist the extraterrestrial theory in this thread:
and it ended looking so good that i decided to make an thread so more people can see it:

but still should we ignore the interdimensional theory yet? it explains way better te higher strangeness encounters than the extraterrestrial theory does for the time being im still sticking with the interdimensional theory i remenber once hearing an encounter where a man said he entered an ufo, while his friend saw he enter an bus that misteriously dissapeared we could claim this is just an "screen memory" but that is just an handwave, an way to we to ignore the unfortunate implications and what do we make of the people that saw bigfoot exiting an ufo? similar species?! what do we make of mothman sightings that were proceded by ufo sightings? an coincidence?! what do we make of the skinwalker ranch? an hoax?! what do we make of the sightings of ufos making stuff that is just impossible? advanced tech?! what do we make of the joe simongton sighting were aliens litteraly cooked pancakes for him? an dumb hoax?! and now for the smoking gun: you can say whatever you want but: UFOS LOOK NOTHING LIKE REAL SPACESHIPS! dont believe me? well take a look at this amazingly well researched article:

do ufos have heat radiators? no! do they have engines,hell even bizzare exotic ones like the orion drive? no! if we are to believe abductee and contactee reports they instead have an bizzare glowing thingy in the center of the ufo that somehow keeps it afloat! do they have an habitation module? no, the entire ufo is pressurized! do they have an airlock? no,they have an completely unprotected door to outside! do they have an spacesuit? well sometimes but that is mostly in older (50's to 70's) reports nowdays they like to walk stark naked just fine i could go on and on but my point has been made

so what do you guys think?
also sorry for the grammar english isnt my main language

Your essay in the intro. offers conclusions based on many assumptions, especially in light of primitive human capacity in the physical sciences and technology. Further, the multiverse or metaverse concept is just an idea, not a theory. Its an exercise in quantum physics calculations and nothing more. There’s no way we could ever carry out any experiment to test for the existence of the multiverse in the world, because it’s not in our world. It’s an article of faith, and a very poor one at that. People are being intellectually swindled by pseudo scientists like Jaques Vallee, who capitalize on the ignorance of the vast masses of lay persons. It is one thing to entertain it as a science fiction novel, but to make more of it than that is intellectually disingenuous.

edit on 21-8-2017 by Gianfar because: script

top topics
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in