It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: khnum
Well Putin is no saint but the daily news and archives of this site detail that the United States is on a quest for total world domination and has become an enemy of not only mankind but the planet itself in this process.Putin does not want chemtrails,geoengineering,a population unhealthy and sterile,frankenfoods etc which makes him an enemy of the USA.
In February 2014, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev ordered the creation of a national research base for genetically-modified organisms that would provide the authorities with expert information and allow for further legislative movements and executive decisions. Medvedev also warned against perceiving GMO products as "absolute evil," but said that the government did not support their use in the food industry.
The most solid evidence I have heard of was the Russians approaching Trump's son and offering dirt on Hilary.
Russia again is just the boogeyman and an unwitting pawn in a power struggle.
originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: Xcathdra
It still does not give the USA legal powers under international law to seize the properties. Furthermore, it seems right there in the article that the seizure was a technical invasion of another country's land.
I can pretty much guarantee that the USA will do the same in Russia now that they are taking back a couple of properties too. It's a known thing that embassies are places where secrets are kept.
None of what your article states provides proof that there was every any useful evidence that clearly pins blame on Russia for election interference. It simply laments that the Russians got mad and broke stuff to ensure they will never find out. The article insinuates that they were expecting to find a trove of documents next to a half drunk cup of coffee entitled "Operation Trumpski for President"
Remember, suspicion alone is never proof.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: Xcathdra
It still does not give the USA legal powers under international law to seize the properties. Furthermore, it seems right there in the article that the seizure was a technical invasion of another country's land.
I can pretty much guarantee that the USA will do the same in Russia now that they are taking back a couple of properties too. It's a known thing that embassies are places where secrets are kept.
None of what your article states provides proof that there was every any useful evidence that clearly pins blame on Russia for election interference. It simply laments that the Russians got mad and broke stuff to ensure they will never find out. The article insinuates that they were expecting to find a trove of documents next to a half drunk cup of coffee entitled "Operation Trumpski for President"
Remember, suspicion alone is never proof.
The suspicions were founded and as such were justified. And since russia invades other countries like crimea they have no room to complain until they hand that back.
But Xcathdra is correct and has posted the legal information. you are wrong .
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: markosity1973
The 2 compounds were used by the FSB and are linked to meddling in the US elections.
originally posted by: Velatropa24
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: markosity1973
The 2 compounds were used by the FSB and are linked to meddling in the US elections.
Did you mean the GRU? The lack of knowledge on the simplest of things such as above, says to me that the rest is "bla bla".
originally posted by: Velatropa24
Explain to me, sinse when was Crimea a country, son?
originally posted by: Velatropa24
I am still waiting for Kosovo to be handed back. Some how don't see that happening.
originally posted by: Velatropa24
And do you really want to start talking about invading countries, being from US? The double standards never cease to amaze me.
originally posted by: Velatropa24
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: Xcathdra
It still does not give the USA legal powers under international law to seize the properties. Furthermore, it seems right there in the article that the seizure was a technical invasion of another country's land.
I can pretty much guarantee that the USA will do the same in Russia now that they are taking back a couple of properties too. It's a known thing that embassies are places where secrets are kept.
None of what your article states provides proof that there was every any useful evidence that clearly pins blame on Russia for election interference. It simply laments that the Russians got mad and broke stuff to ensure they will never find out. The article insinuates that they were expecting to find a trove of documents next to a half drunk cup of coffee entitled "Operation Trumpski for President"
Remember, suspicion alone is never proof.
The suspicions were founded and as such were justified. And since russia invades other countries like crimea they have no room to complain until they hand that back.
But Xcathdra is correct and has posted the legal information. you are wrong .
Explain to me, sinse when was Crimea a country, son?
I am still waiting for Kosovo to be handed back. Some how don't see that happening. And do you really want to start talking about invading countries, being from US? The double standards never cease to amaze me.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Velatropa24
Explain to me, sinse when was Crimea a country, son?
Sometime around the 8th century, BCE. Then the invasions and occupations began. Interestingly the Russians had nothing to do with Crimea until 1783. It was an autonomous republic under the USSR, downgraded during WWII to an oblast and then given to Ukraine in 1954.
originally posted by: Velatropa24
I am still waiting for Kosovo to be handed back. Some how don't see that happening.
Why would it be given back. it would undermine the Brussels agreement of 2013 signed by Kosovo and Serbia.
originally posted by: Velatropa24
And do you really want to start talking about invading countries, being from US? The double standards never cease to amaze me.
Sure - the US didnt invade Ukraine and illegally seize / occupy Crimea.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Velatropa24
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: markosity1973
a reply to: Xcathdra
It still does not give the USA legal powers under international law to seize the properties. Furthermore, it seems right there in the article that the seizure was a technical invasion of another country's land.
I can pretty much guarantee that the USA will do the same in Russia now that they are taking back a couple of properties too. It's a known thing that embassies are places where secrets are kept.
None of what your article states provides proof that there was every any useful evidence that clearly pins blame on Russia for election interference. It simply laments that the Russians got mad and broke stuff to ensure they will never find out. The article insinuates that they were expecting to find a trove of documents next to a half drunk cup of coffee entitled "Operation Trumpski for President"
Remember, suspicion alone is never proof.
The suspicions were founded and as such were justified. And since russia invades other countries like crimea they have no room to complain until they hand that back.
But Xcathdra is correct and has posted the legal information. you are wrong .
Explain to me, sinse when was Crimea a country, son?
I am still waiting for Kosovo to be handed back. Some how don't see that happening. And do you really want to start talking about invading countries, being from US? The double standards never cease to amaze me.
No need Xcath did that for me it seems. And I am not your son. How dare you call me such a thing. If i had a father like you id disown myself and change my name. Kosovo btw was ethnically cleansing and deserved what they got.
Im almost 40 btw. Son my Arse.