It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
The ones who have seen them here don't care that everyone else didn't get to see them. Perhaps that is why those who have never seen any proof are so frustrated.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Xtrozero
That wasn't meant as an insult.
Lol, OK thanks I read that as I'm basically flat earth believer unwilling to except anything else such as a round 3D world.
originally posted by: intrptr
Allegorically speaking, yes. We are all limited by our perspective when it comes to 'higher' dimensions.
originally posted by: CaptainBeno
To admit to "Aliens" by the Government or anyone credible connected to it would be admitting that UFOs are infact just visitors from our future.
It's us. End of.
The experiments, the abductions. All us.
Except, they can't admit it's us, because no one would ever admit to being able to travel back in time and being able to change stuff.
No Aliens, Just us (or Avatars of us) in drones able to port back from the future.
Have a think about that for a while, let it settle in.
originally posted by: BigBangWasAnEcho
What about the obvious freemasons who call in to C2C on the nights of Delonge related discussion, obviously pretending to be airplane pilots who have seen UFOs. What's their motivation? Owed Toms father a favor?
originally posted by: Maroboduus
originally posted by: CaptainBeno
To admit to "Aliens" by the Government or anyone credible connected to it would be admitting that UFOs are infact just visitors from our future.
It's us. End of.
The experiments, the abductions. All us.
Except, they can't admit it's us, because no one would ever admit to being able to travel back in time and being able to change stuff.
No Aliens, Just us (or Avatars of us) in drones able to port back from the future.
Have a think about that for a while, let it settle in.
This.... this is dumb. Really, really dumb. "End of."
Any semi-intelligent person would realize how incredibly stupid this idea is after even a moment's thought.
originally posted by: coursecatalog
As for Grant Cameron, I certainly don't see him as an opportunist. Do you think he gets rich from these books he writes? The web sites he's been writing for free for years? All the personal money he has spent on freedom of information requests??
He is writing about all the characters who revolve around this bizarre field - including oddballs like Greer and Lear - not necessarily endorsing them.
originally posted by: charlyv
While it could be a combination of things, the theory that we will visit ourselves from the future actually has the most scientific merit, in quantum physics.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: charlyv
While it could be a combination of things, the theory that we will visit ourselves from the future actually has the most scientific merit, in quantum physics.
To physically move to the past or future would create paradoxes and so we would see infinite futures take form...maybe, but do you really think this is the most viable option to one life form finding another?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: intrptr
Allegorically speaking, yes. We are all limited by our perspective when it comes to 'higher' dimensions.
Yes and that goes both ways. We are extremely limited in our perception. Our brain fakes us out in having us think it is much better than it is. A good book on this is The Invisible Gorilla: How Our Intuitions Deceive Us. On top of our poor perspective we also have poor memory that once again our brains make us think it is so much better than it is.
originally posted by: Kromlech
Perhaps he does know something, but had his life threatened over it? Hence the reluctance? Happens all the time. Just a thought.
Wouldn't write him off just yet. Obviously a reason for the delay, that we DON'T know.