It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Engineers conduct the third in a series of RS-25 flight controller tests on July 25, 2017, for NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket. The more than 8 1/2 minute test on the A-1 Test Stand at NASA’s Stennis Space Center in Mississippi signaled another step toward launch of NASA’s new
Space Launch System (SLS). The SLS rocket, powered by four RS-25 engines, along with the Orion spacecraft will take astronauts on a new era of exploration beyond Earth’s orbit into deep space.
It's a great test, but project Orion was the name of a planned spacecraft that would use nuclear bombs for propulsion so I'm not sure Orion was the best name to use for the new spacecraft. I would have picked a different name.
originally posted by: Crumbles
Space Launch System (SLS). The SLS rocket, powered by four RS-25 engines, along with the Orion spacecraft will take astronauts on a new era of exploration beyond Earth’s orbit into deep space.
I had no clue we were building an orion spacecraft to go beyond earth orbit. Orion is used a lot in sci-fi so it is appropriate. Anyway an amazing test.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: Crumbles
I'm going to have to read up on Orion.
Thanks for this.
I had feared that NASA was gearing down to close after the Shuttle got canned.
In a sense that's true. What flew was a small proof of concept prototype using conventional explosives instead of nukes, but it was enough to show the project orion idea could work. You can see it at 41:50 in the following video. Because it was such a unique technology the test was impressive even though the model was small, but I have to say the test video in the OP of this thread is more impressive. I wonder how many tons of fuel it burned. It must have been a lot.
originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: Arbitrageur
they are rumors a version of this flew. if it was a international effort it would be easier to hide.
Earth orbit is barely space and that's where all the secret space activity takes place, and it's only secret to a certain extent. There are NOTAMs for launches of even classified missions so we know about the launch even if we don't know the purpose of the secret mission but there are usually some good guesses. I think all the missions that make it past Earth orbit are public. I would doubt claims to the contrary.
im not saying i necessarily believe the rumors but i know the US and some others are much further along in spaCE then most can accept
It took me a while to figure out what you were saying. The video the OP linked to at liveleak is the same test as the one TEOTWAWKIAIFF embedded, so it is the RS-25. I thought you were saying that one was not the RS-25 at first, but it IS the RS-25.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
You are correct.
The rocket tested in the OP's video is NOT the RS-25 engine.
Your video (with the test in the vertical configuration) does show the test of the RS-25 that was just conducted on July 25. The OP's video of the solid booster test was from June 2016.
originally posted by: zatara
a reply to: Crumbles
Does not give the impression to be an efficient engine. Probably much work to do..