Attorney General to announce official leak investgation

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yeah I wouldn't think that is not protected at all.

If you want to close a prosecution you want a veil of secrecy to collect evidence.

That is a different thing then Donald Trump is say collecting names of all the liberal corporations for a n irs sting.

a reply to: luthier

This investigation is clearly partisan motivated and fueled by Trump's insecurities. If he actually cared he would fix the problems the leakers are leaking about instead of scapegoating them instead.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: luthier

This investigation is clearly partisan motivated and fueled by Trump's insecurities.

lol

since your "whistleblower" theory was shot down you fall back to good old partisan motivation
lol

at least you are consistent

a reply to: shooterbrody

It wasn't shot down though... If you noticed, Luthier used a double negative so that reads that he is agreeing with me.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

what you referenced has protocols to follow

a reply to: shooterbrody

And? Trump doesn't care about protocols. That's partially why he thinks these leaks are illegal in the first place.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

lol
doesnt really matter what trump thinks about the laws for whistleblower protection
if the whistleblower doesnt follow them they are not protected
bashing trump does not change that

a reply to: shooterbrody

Do you have any evidence suggesting that they haven't been followed? Because Trump certainly has never presented any to justify this investigation. It more so looks like an attempt to distract from his own investigations.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

perhaps the fact that there is an investigation?
even if there were whistleblower protections that could be applied there would still be an investigation

lol

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t

perhaps the fact that there is an investigation?

So you are suggesting that there is something to the investigations into Trump just because they exist too?

even if there were whistleblower protections that could be applied there would still be an investigation

lol

Yes, I agree. Because Trump is an insecure manchild more worried about his own image than bettering the country.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

nope
i am suggesting that as usual you are full of crap and opened you cakehole before you looked into what kind of protections there are for "whistleblowers"
in addition you throw whatever bs you make up at the potus , or perhaps that is your only real intention

a reply to: shooterbrody

Ah so an ad hominem in a non-mud pit forum. Ok your point will be ignored going forward. Thanks for clarifying. I apologize for taking you seriously at first. My bad.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

point being you do not understand the "whistleblower" protections YOU brought up without ANY source?
or point being you hate trump and take any opportunity to throw shade his way?

originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti

originally posted by: Terminal1
I want Trump to fire him. I really cannot stand Sessions.

DC has always leaked in recent memory and will always leak.

That's why it's called the swamp. Maybe after it's drained, DC won't be like DC always is!

But Trump HIRED Sessions.

He added him to this swamp.

a reply to: DanteGaland

technically he was already in the swamp, no?
senator to ag?