It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Tweets NO Transgender in Military

page: 53
78
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: RomeByFire




So nothing should be implied from this statement whatsoever?


Imply all you want, because that's all you have.


So nothing should be implied based on Trump's tweets.

I'll keep that in mind the next time I see a "Trump is playing 400d chess with his tweets!"




posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: TheTory

Someone sounds desperate


Time to start backtracking again



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire




So nothing should be implied based on Trump's tweets.

I'll keep that in mind the next time I see a "Trump is playing 400d chess with his tweets!"


Didn't say that either. Is that more of your alternative facts?



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

No, actually, the person you quote previously was correct.

Why do you care so much about how others look?



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: SudoNim




Someone sounds desperate

Time to start backtracking again


Denial then desperation. Accuse others of that which you are guilty in full effect.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: RomeByFire




So nothing should be implied based on Trump's tweets.

I'll keep that in mind the next time I see a "Trump is playing 400d chess with his tweets!"


Didn't say that either. Is that more of your alternative facts?


Where did I say that you said... anything?

Like I said, play semantics all you'd like




posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
Guys, the Commander in Chief has made his decision.
To suggest he has not, in 6 months in office, spoken to Mattis or the Joint Chiefs about this is quite a claim. One that must be proven if you are to make the accusation.
I read the link and looked through some linked sources and can not see anyone even suggest they have had no conversations on this.



Oh so now its "spoken to them at all"... keep moving the goalposts.

I thought you'd retreated into your cave for good after I exposed your insecurities.
Someone has gender issues... is it fear, paranoia or denial. It's hard to tell.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:12 PM
link   
What about Otherkin?



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien

It says he consulted them but not what their response was. How can you suggest there is an about face? Is there evidence that said they do not approve, before or after? I don't see any and I could be wrong.

Then he could have worded it carefully so there will be no apparent implication.
He could have said either:
"I consulted with the generals and they said they were for it."
or
"I consulted with the generals but they said no so I will do it anyway."


Yeah I guess. But you mentioned an about face. Did the generals and military experts Trump consulted disapprove? I can't find evidence of this anywhere.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire




Where did I say that you said... anything?

Like I said, play semantics all you'd like



Oh right. I "implied" it. I forgot.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: SudoNim




Someone sounds desperate

Time to start backtracking again


Denial then desperation. Accuse others of that which you are guilty in full effect.


Says the repetitious parroting troll ...



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




Says the repetitious parroting troll ...


You sure you don;t want to put a question mark behind that?



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: RomeByFire




Where did I say that you said... anything?

Like I said, play semantics all you'd like



Oh right. I "implied" it. I forgot.


Hmmm. That seems awfully familiar.


Accuse others of that which you are guilty in full effect.


It was fun




posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien

It says he consulted them but not what their response was. How can you suggest there is an about face? Is there evidence that said they do not approve, before or after? I don't see any and I could be wrong.

Then he could have worded it carefully so there will be no apparent implication.
He could have said either:
"I consulted with the generals and they said they were for it."
or
"I consulted with the generals but they said no so I will do it anyway."


Yeah I guess. But you mentioned an about face. Did the generals and military experts Trump consulted disapprove? I can't find evidence of this anywhere.

The military said there will be no change in the policy the day after Trump's tweet that said he consulted with them. That's pretty odd don't you think?



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire




Hmmm. That seems awfully familiar.


probably does, because I accused someone else of imagining what was said instead of actually repeating what was said, something you yourself are guilty of.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: RomeByFire




Hmmm. That seems awfully familiar.


probably does, because I accused someone else of imagining what was said instead of actually repeating what was said, something you yourself are guilty of.

LOL. No I was not imagining it. For all we know Trump could be lying.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: TheTory

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien

It says he consulted them but not what their response was. How can you suggest there is an about face? Is there evidence that said they do not approve, before or after? I don't see any and I could be wrong.

Then he could have worded it carefully so there will be no apparent implication.
He could have said either:
"I consulted with the generals and they said they were for it."
or
"I consulted with the generals but they said no so I will do it anyway."


Yeah I guess. But you mentioned an about face. Did the generals and military experts Trump consulted disapprove? I can't find evidence of this anywhere.

The military said there will be no change in the policy the day after Trump's tweet that said he consulted with them. That's pretty odd don't you think?


Not at all. These things have to go through the proper channels.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Gryphon66




Says the repetitious parroting troll ...


You sure you don;t want to put a question mark behind that?


Nah, you make it painfully obvious with every post you SQUAWK out.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheTory

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: TheTory

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien

It says he consulted them but not what their response was. How can you suggest there is an about face? Is there evidence that said they do not approve, before or after? I don't see any and I could be wrong.

Then he could have worded it carefully so there will be no apparent implication.
He could have said either:
"I consulted with the generals and they said they were for it."
or
"I consulted with the generals but they said no so I will do it anyway."


Yeah I guess. But you mentioned an about face. Did the generals and military experts Trump consulted disapprove? I can't find evidence of this anywhere.

The military said there will be no change in the policy the day after Trump's tweet that said he consulted with them. That's pretty odd don't you think?


Not at all. These things have to go through the proper channels.

Of course.



posted on Jul, 27 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66




Nah, you make it painfully obvious with every post you SQUAWK out.


I bet you make a squawking sound while reading what I wrote, at least to reinforce your unhinged imagination.




top topics



 
78
<< 50  51  52    54  55  56 >>

log in

join