It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Huh? Do you know what "implied" means?
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien
Huh? Do you know what "implied" means?
Yes I do. How do you know what Trump implied?
originally posted by: AMPTAH
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: JoshuaCox
A surgery for a transition to mtf or ftm is in no way beneficial to the military or even necessary to begin with. Btw look up dialation procedure for the transision from man to female. Now imagine a trans soldier in a war zone with that "problem".
A transgender would make an excellent soldier.
Just think of it. Being born a male has certain advantages, like stronger muscles and bones, making for a more hardy soldier. But, being a woman has other advantages, like being able to infiltrate ISIS undercover as a sex doll for all those sexually deprived militants. So, with a transgender soldier, you get the best of both advantages, can can send in your covert operatives right behind enemy lines, without them even suspecting a thing.
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien
So you make it up?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien
So you make it up?
Oh you're like Les? A literalist?
originally posted by: TheTory
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien
So you make it up?
Oh you're like Les? A literalist?
Like what? I'm a man. Perhaps you can give me some evidence that supports any of these statements:
Trump - "Can we ban transgender people from the military?" Generals - "Sure." Trump - "Ok I'll tweet that".
Later
Generals - "Nope we do not support the ban."
You are too literal to understand that that was a scenario to present to you so that you understand how little sense it makes.
No. I am just explaining to you how it doesn't make sense. First they're ok with it. Now they're not ok with it. Why the about-face?
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien
No. I am just explaining to you how it doesn't make sense. First they're ok with it. Now they're not ok with it. Why the about-face?
As I mentioned earlier, Trump never stated whether they were ok with it or not. Do you have any evidence that suggests either?
After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow......
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien
You are too literal to understand that that was a scenario to present to you so that you understand how little sense it makes.
Or maybe you're too metaphorical to notice you're giving me imagined scenario to support your claim of what he implied.
After consultation with my Generals and military experts,
So nothing should be implied from this statement whatsoever?
originally posted by: TheTory
a reply to: Deaf Alien
It says he consulted them but not what their response was. How can you suggest there is an about face? Is there evidence that said they do not approve, before or after? I don't see any and I could be wrong.