It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ancient humans had sex with non humans (Could it be Aliens...)

page: 2
16
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 25 2017 @ 01:02 PM
link   
Ancient humans had sex with non humans (Aliens)

Anything is possible.

Guess Dr. Gias Balter was right after all.

Only thing left is for the machines to take over.





posted on Jul, 25 2017 @ 01:12 PM
link   
Dunno, but maybe humanity is older and more widespread than we now know ?

Maybe someone seeded dna on many planets... many planets like Earth, that ended up producing native grown hominids that were "human?"

Maybe some advanced humans came here to breed with the furry-hot natives with pristine dna?

Maybe the horny, drunk, quarreling visitors were mistaken for gods?

Maybe something bad happened and the "gods" lost their mojo?

Sure, a lotta 'maybes,' but ... maybe.



posted on Jul, 25 2017 @ 01:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheErlenmeyerFlask
a reply to: neoholographic

Scientific evidence starting to prove Biblical scripture and Jewish Antiquity accounts. Genesis and the Works of Josephus.



Exactly!

When you look at a lot of these things, science is starting to return to what Ancients have been saying for years. To me, the Bible is a clear example of Extraterrestrial Visitation. You have clouds flying in the sky and taking people up into these clouds. These clouds are also associated with missing time.



posted on Jul, 25 2017 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Baddogma




Dunno, but maybe humanity is older and more widespread than we now know ?


Depends on what you want to believe.



It seems plausible that these technologies arose 50,000 to 60,000 years ago in Africa and later spread to Europe, Villa said.


Source



The incredible discovery was made in South Africa, around 150 km west of port Maputo. There, we find the remains of a huge metropolis that measures, according to tests, around 1500 square kilometers. This ancient city is, according to researchers, part of an even larger community with about 10,000 square kilometers and is believed to have been constructed 160,000 to 200,000 years before Christ.


Source

Whatever the case.

As knowledge progress.

As civilization progress.

We will never really know until someone builds a time machine.



posted on Jul, 25 2017 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic

originally posted by: TheErlenmeyerFlask
a reply to: neoholographic

Scientific evidence starting to prove Biblical scripture and Jewish Antiquity accounts. Genesis and the Works of Josephus.



Exactly!

When you look at a lot of these things, science is starting to return to what Ancients have been saying for years. To me, the Bible is a clear example of Extraterrestrial Visitation. You have clouds flying in the sky and taking people up into these clouds. These clouds are also associated with missing time.


Aren't scholars still trying to dispute that Jesus didn't exist while an exodus of 30,000 somewhat Jews trekking through the desert still being diluted amongst schools of literature vs those of religion?



posted on Jul, 25 2017 @ 03:42 PM
link   
Look this is a bunch of B.S.!!

Humans did not just have sex with non humans OK!

They made love.



posted on Jul, 25 2017 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

I thought you might enjoy this information - fits right in I believe.

THE SUMERIAN KING LIST UNVEILED



Compiled from several different clay tablets, the final part of the King List contains the names of historically attested rulers and cities but these are not the focus of this article. To the forbidden history community, the first, unattested kings on the list present greater interest.

Also known as antediluvian rulers, the first eight kings in the list totaled a reign of 242,100 years, in a mythical period before the great flood swept the area. Mainstream scholars dismiss the existence of these lords and their impossibly-long reigns, citing the fact that no archaeological discoveries support the unusual claims made by the stone tablets.

Yet the cuneiform words are there: “After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridug. In Eridug, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28800 years.”


This is, in my opinion, what covers the 'gap theory' from the Bible - and - acount for the 'giants' that roamed the earth.


The coming of the Great Flood – considered by some a global catastrophe – put an end to the reign of the mythical kings.

Exactly why God made the flood to happen. He wasn't killing people - he was killing 'them'.

peace



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 07:13 AM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Dude these day's they are doing it with plastic doll's, next it will be supercomputers and a whole load of passengers once witnessed an immigrant to the UK from one of the Yugoslav nation's doing it to a goat as the train sped past, they even filmed it on there camera's (mobile phone thingy's, darn new fangled technology and why do they vibrate when they ring), some cat's and even dog's have also suffered and may the good lord have mercy on all those vacuum cleaners that received these tender ministration's so if some poor sod from another world crashed here and a local human was in that kind of mood it is very possible.

There is probably even a warning sign out there telling aliens to not get out of there cars and to avoid this planet.

Still USUALLY this leads to the extinction of the offending species, after all you can not really have descendant's when your love item is an inanimate object or a genetically incompatible creature.

Then again gene splicing is a possibility BUT if human's had children by another species then the only remaining argument since that species was therefore BIO COMPATIBLE AND GENETICALLY COMPATIBLE is that the other species was also human, perhaps time travelers, your ancestor is your own descendant cue the twilight zone theme tune.

Of course it is a mystery worth solving, you know it may even have medical application and open up new avenues of research if we ever do unravel it.

edit on 26-7-2017 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 07:46 AM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Except for the fact that this isn't true at all and the only way to believe this is true is to ignore a plethora of evidence to the contrary. As Seagull says below, it was a slow process over an extraordinarily long period of time which you are attributing solely to "cro-magnon" (which is an anachronistic term that Anthropologists havent used in about 20 years and people who push a thesis similar to yours don't seem to want to understand that Cromagnon is just a synonym for anatomically modern humans/early modern humans. I.E. the first H. Sapiens to make their way into Europe) when the things you attempt to attribute solely to AMH/EMH were present for at least 100 Ka in Neanderthal prior to H. Sapiens ever leaving Africa.

Wore tailored and fitted clothing? Neanderthal. Made jewelry and art? Neanderthal. Buried their dead? Neanderthal. Aurignacian lithics? Direct descendent of Mousterian. Even more of a detriment to your thesis that "Cro-magnon" was somehow lifted to superior status over their European predecessors overnight is that as we find in sites in the Levant that exhibit periods of cohabitation between HN and HS, the Neanderthal taught these skills to the AMH taking their first steps outside of Africa.

Mousterian lithics skills were far superior to the tool making skills of early AMH who first encountered HN. It wasn't until a couple of tens of thousands of years AFTER meeting, living, mating and cohabiting with the Neanderthal that AMH were able to take those skill sets and improve upon them.

It is far more likely that the success of AMH/EMH is built upon the work of and collaboration with Neanderthal and potentially Denisovans than it is likely that we were genetically created or spliced by some magical alien species for which zero evidence exists. Meanwhile there are several sites in the Levant (Lebanon, Israel,Syria, Western Iraq) that show actual physical evidence for everything I mention above. Hell, Suma de los Huesos shows intentional burial and that is a member of our Genus that is in between H. Heidelbergensis and H. Neanderthalensis and that site is at least 350 Ka. So no... there was no overnight revolution where Cro-Magnon magically appeared as an independent and superior hominid species.



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

Personal view: The scientists are making a big deal out of something that can easily be explained in four words: "Monkey see, monkey do."

Once a single ape has figured out how to use tools (and we can see this still happening in the wild today), every ape who sees it and understands it will start doing likewise. If that sort of intelligence and insight confers an evolutionary advantage, then the children of those apes will do better than their peers, be more likely to survive, and so on throughout their future - all the while learning old tricks from their parents and finding some new ones of their own. Sort of intellectual bootstrapping. And of course, being behavioural it wouldn't leave any trace behind except the evidence of the activity itself.

This kind of copycat "viral" transmission of ideas and insights isn't unknown in other species, either. In the UK, in the late 1970s and early 1980s, people were baffled because suddenly bluetits had learned that if they pecked through the foil cap on a bottle of milk, they could drink the rich cream off the top. (This was when household milk deliveries left you glass bottles of milk on the doorstep in the early morning, and nearly all milk was non-homogenised).

No-one's sure where it started, but everyone agreed that it had never happened before and then suddenly it was all over the country like a plague.



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 10:47 AM
link   
a reply to: audubon

This just makes no sense. You said:

Personal view: The scientists are making a big deal out of something that can easily be explained in four words: "Monkey see, monkey do."

This just isn't the case. If this was so easy to explain, their wouldn't be a debate about this by Scientist over the years. Here's more:

The reason for the above, apparently contrary statement, he explains, is that “the abilities of today’s Homo sapiens . .
represent a huge leap away from those of our precursors”. In other words, modern human behaviour is not a simple extrapolation of earlier trends, but something entirely new. Evidence of this novel behaviour, such as the rate and degree of technological innovation and the use of symbolism— implying modern levels of language and consciousness—first appears in the archaeological record, particularly of Europe, about 40 000 years ago.


www.newscientist.com...

When you look at the timeline, there isn't any gradual change. People who support this view have written papers acknowledging there's no evidence that this occurred. They extrapolate things and say it must have occurred just because they want to believe.

The fact is, a huge change occurred 100 to 150,000 years ago in Africa. The Cro Magnon emerged in Europe with high levels of consciousness and technology that were not present before this change occurred.

Now we have evidence of a ghost species that makes this clear.

The DNA introduced, changed primitive hominids and made them want to tattoo themselves, live in huts, make more sophisticated painting and drawings, make more sophisticated tools and live a life that's similar to the way we live today. Primitive hominids took a great leap forwards towards humans today.



What were they trying to tell us with these paintings of strange looking beings?



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 11:00 AM
link   
a reply to: neoholographic

I said it was my personal view, and I stand by that.

As for the physical evidence, you could mount an exhibition of every single fossil of pre-stone age humans, with room for visitors to look at each exhibit from all sides, and not fill an average railway carriage. Most of the science-lite pontificating about proto-humans is based on this lack of evidence, rather than on any abundance of it.



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: audubon

This makes no sense. You said:

Most of the science-lite pontificating about proto-humans is based on this lack of evidence, rather than on any abundance of it.

You make it sound like Scientist who have been debating this issue for years are just idiots.

They debate these issues because they see a level of sophistication and technology that they didn't see in any gradual way. These civilizations eventually led to the civilizations of Egypt, Greece and the United States.

What led primitive hominids to all of a sudden want to live a much more sophisticated life? What made them want to build houses and tattoo themselves? What made them want to sew their clothes? How do they even know what sewing is? What made them want to start marking time with a calender?

Something changed and there was a great leap forward that's been debated by Scientist for years.



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 11:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic
a reply to: audubon

This makes no sense. You said:

Most of the science-lite pontificating about proto-humans is based on this lack of evidence, rather than on any abundance of it.

You make it sound like Scientist who have been debating this issue for years are just idiots.


That is your interpretation, and you are welcome to it.



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 11:47 AM
link   
Here's a video that illustrates what I'm talking about.



The Scientist points out that making the Cro Magnon weapon takes hours where the Neanderthal weapon was more primitive. You first had to soak the Cro Magnon spear for hours then you had to carve it and sand it. How did they know how to do all of this? As he talks about in the video, where did the will come from and sophistication to do these things.

He points out that before Cro Magnon the Neanderthals and others probably kept reinventing the wheel because there was this lack of flow of information. After Cro Magnon showed up, we began to advance more rapidly and in a more sophisticated way. Why? What happened?

I think this ghost species may give us some answers.



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 12:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic
The Scientist points out that making the Cro Magnon weapon takes hours where the Neanderthal weapon was more primitive. You first had to soak the Cro Magnon spear for hours then you had to carve it and sand it. How did they know how to do all of this? As he talks about in the video, where did the will come from and sophistication to do these things.

He points out that before Cro Magnon the Neanderthals and others probably kept reinventing the wheel because there was this lack of flow of information. After Cro Magnon showed up, we began to advance more rapidly and in a more sophisticated way. Why? What happened?

I think this ghost species may give us some answers.

Here's a suggestion.

If you're trying to find out more about this particular subject, don't bother with any video or site that talks about or refers to the emergence of Cro Magnon man.
Cro Magnon Man was modern Homo Sapiens Sapiens.
In other words, us.
There was at least one other subspecies of Homo Sapiens - Homo sapiens idaltu in Africa, and likely others.
This "timeline" you mention has not been established. Since that's the case, Anthropologists can only go by the evidence they have in hand.

Anyway, a website talking about "Cro Magnon" is using an outdated term that applies to a particular group of Homo Sapiens Sapiens whose remains were found on the property of a Frenchman whose last name was Magnon.

Harte



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 01:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: neoholographic

You know Sitchin was a complete fraud right?

Von Däniken seems to not gaf about the fact that the dude didn't translate even 1 sumerian script correctly.

Your source material is lying to you.



Despite Von Däniken and Stichin do you really think that a credible scientist would say well they used gene therapy to create a new line of Humans or they had sex with monkeys which would a larger percentage of the population believe?



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 01:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: neoholographic
Here's a video that illustrates what I'm talking about.



The Scientist points out that making the Cro Magnon weapon takes hours where the Neanderthal weapon was more primitive. You first had to soak the Cro Magnon spear for hours then you had to carve it and sand it. How did they know how to do all of this? As he talks about in the video, where did the will come from and sophistication to do these things.

He points out that before Cro Magnon the Neanderthals and others probably kept reinventing the wheel because there was this lack of flow of information. After Cro Magnon showed up, we began to advance more rapidly and in a more sophisticated way. Why? What happened?

I think this ghost species may give us some answers.


Sorry but no...I love science truly, but this is hardly scientific...

Funnier thing about his video is the chubby not in the greatest of shape scientist chucking a heavy spear designed for a more adept muscular Neanderthal. Then telling me they couldn't be thrown very far at which point I am supposed to accept this as fact cause well he is a scientist and I just watched a out of shape "modern" homo-sapien throw it therefore it wasn't very technologically advanced than its cro-magnon (homo sapiens) counterpart...

BWHAHAHA!


edit on pmbAmerica/ChicagovAmerica/ChicagoWed, 26 Jul 2017 14:46:37 -0500pm2America/Chicago by abeverage because: edited for clarity



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Harte

Here's a suggestion.

When you're anal-retentive about the use of the word Cro-Magnon on a message board about Aliens, you look kind of silly and it's obvious you can't debate the issue.

Just because Cro-Magnons are commonly called Homo Sapiens Sapiens or European early modern humans today doesn't invalidate the years and years of research when they were called Cro-Magnon.

The fact that you can't debate the issue and you're debating semantics just shows you have no argument.

Cro-Magnons is still used in popular culture and I'm on a message board, not debating a Professor. It's a difference in name only. So when you say:

If you're trying to find out more about this particular subject, don't bother with any video or site that talks about or refers to the emergence of Cro Magnon man.

That's just a flat out lie!

There's over 100 years of Research where the term Cro-Magnon was used. Why would science throw out all of that research because of Semantics? That's just nonsense.

If we start calling Gravity Emergent Entanglement because we discover Gravity is tied to the entropy of Entanglement as some suggest, that doesn't mean all of the research that used the word Gravity would be thrown out. That would be ASININE. Here's more:

Why Don't We Call Them Cro-Magnon Anymore?


Cro-Magnon is the name scientists once used to refer to what are now called Early Modern Humans or Anatomically Modern Humans--people who lived in our world at the end of the last ice age (ca. 40,000-10,000 years ago); they lived alongside Neanderthals for about 10,000 of those years. They were given the name 'Cro-Magnon' because, in 1868, parts of five skeletons were discovered in the rock shelter of that name, located in the famous Dordogne Valley of France.

A century and a half of research since then has led scholars to believe that the physical dimensions of so-called 'Cro-Magnon' are not sufficiently different enough from modern humans today to warrant a separate designation. Scientists today use 'Anatomically Modern Human' (AMH) or 'Early Modern Human' (EMH) to designate the Upper Paleolithic human beings who looked a lot like us but did not have the complete suite of modern human behaviors, or rather, who were in the process of developing those behaviors.


www.thoughtco.com...

Like I said, you're debating semantics because you can't debate the issue. The only reason they started calling them Early Modern Humans is because they weren't so different from us that they needed a separate designation.

It goes on to say:

Before the return of EMH to the Middle East and Europe, the first modern behaviors are in evidence at several South African sites of the Still Bay/Howiesons Poort tradition, about 75,000-65,000 years ago. But it wasn't until about 50,000 years ago or so that a difference in tools, in burial methods, in the presence of art and music, and changes in social behaviors as well, had been developed. At the same time, waves of early modern humans left Africa.

BOOM!


Exactly what I have been saying.

All of a sudden, modern social behaviors appeared that led to the modern world. Where did this come from? All of a sudden you had a Cro-Magnon(early modern humans) appear with an advanced civilization that led to civilizations like Egypt, Greece and America.
edit on 26-7-2017 by neoholographic because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2017 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: abeverage

What???

You can't be serious. You said:

Sorry but no...I love science truly, but this is hardly scientific...

With all due respect, this is just an ASININE statement.

This is Science. Scientist like the man in the video take time recreating these tools. This is how they know how modern an advanced things were when the Cro-Magnon appeared.

Scientist reverse engineer these things to see how long it takes them to make these tools and weapons. To say this isn't science is just LUDICROUS as Mike Tyson would say.



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join