It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: micpsi
what the heck it was that briefly emerged out of the other side and then disappeared.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: micpsi
Are you saying there was no wreckage from the jets on the streets after the WTC impacts?
Ever think not all the wreckage hit street level?
Part of landing gear from 9/11 plane is found wedged between luxury condos and Ground Zero Islamic center - 11 years after attacks
www.dailymail.co.uk...
The piece of a Boeing Airliner that crashed in Cali, Columbia that somehow materialized on the Pentagon lawn on 9/11, and was photographed there in various positions in various places, with a piece of jungle vine still embedded in it. The great thing about this new aircraft part is that the rope used to lower it into place... is still there!
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Or better yet? Actually link to or post the smoking gun picture?
And can you actually support the topic of this thread?
No cited sources.
No picture provided.
Off topic post.
Equals zero credibility.........
originally posted by: waypastvne
originally posted by: micpsi
what the heck it was that briefly emerged out of the other side and then disappeared.
A 767 has about 19500 cubic feet of air with a mass weight of 1500 pounds inside its cabin. It is moving at 800 feet per second. This air has to go somewhere, The majority of it will continue the path it's traveling and out the other side of the building. It pushed some fireproofing dust ahead of it,this is what you see coming out the other side of the building.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: micpsi
Are you saying there was no wreckage from the jets on the streets after the WTC impacts?
Ever think not all the wreckage hit street level?
Part of landing gear from 9/11 plane is found wedged between luxury condos and Ground Zero Islamic center - 11 years after attacks
www.dailymail.co.uk...
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: micpsi
You gotta understand this was camera tech from decades ago. Cell phone cameras today could probably catch a cleaner picture from the ground level than a news copter could from a distance back then. Now add in magnetic tape media. Then digital transfers. Then people crop and cutting and rendering then uploading them online and people use oddball apps to capture them and then re-render to upload to another streaming service which re-renders them upon upload completion (and that process done over and over again).
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: micpsi
Well that's easy, as I said 10 years ago either the planes ejected the parts unto the ground (as seen in the crisp photos) OR the MIB and their "Flashy Thing" would have had to plant the stuff in broad daylight on that oh so clear sky morning.
This one I wrote for a Pentagon thread but you'll get the idea:
originally posted by: micpsi
2.[Why) does it become seen BEFORE debris, smoke and the fireball exits two sides of the tower? Smoke and dust would not be travelling faster than the expanding fireball? The image does not make sense. It looks solid, yet seems to vanish into thin air.