New video of explosion at the Twin Towers without a plane

originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Salander

You are aware that civilian airliners have been known to exceed Mach 1 in a dive ......

Diving a plane from high altitude converts the potential energy to kinetic energy

Or did you miss that fact in high school physics...???

Maybe like to tell us how WTC buildings were destroyed by nuclear explosions ..... Come on we need a laugh .....

Stick to fire trucks Chief. Your aviation talk is humorous, but not enlightening.

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: Salander

You are aware that civilian airliners have been known to exceed Mach 1 in a dive ......

Diving a plane from high altitude converts the potential energy to kinetic energy

Or did you miss that fact in high school physics...???

Maybe like to tell us how WTC buildings were destroyed by nuclear explosions ..... Come on we need a laugh .....

Stick to fire trucks Chief. Your aviation talk is humorous, but not enlightening.

Typical conspiracist lack of facts, use of false authority, and innuendo. How about actual quoted examples, and a credible argument to prove your case. Not character assassination with no rational explanation.

originally posted by: prevenge

originally posted by: auroraaus
a reply to: prevenge

Despite the tech available back in 2001... at least publicly available.

But if you are correct, then how to you explain to the thousands of eyewitnesses on the ground and in the surrounding buildings?

Pics or it didn't happen

Fair dinkum prevenge!

Most available raw footage online shows thousands of eyewitnesses on the ground and in the buildings!

Are you just trolling now??

originally posted by: auroraaus

originally posted by: prevenge

originally posted by: auroraaus
a reply to: prevenge

Despite the tech available back in 2001... at least publicly available.

But if you are correct, then how to you explain to the thousands of eyewitnesses on the ground and in the surrounding buildings?

Pics or it didn't happen

Fair dinkum prevenge!

Most available raw footage online shows thousands of eyewitnesses on the ground and in the buildings!

Are you just trolling now??

Is that a joke, that raw footage online shows thousands of eyewitnesses on the ground and in the buildings?

If it's not a joke, I would love to see such a picture of those who saw the mythical 77 strike the pentagon.

a reply to: Salander

So, what did cause the damage at the pentagon?

a reply to: neutronflux

Russian Navy Spetsnaz Team 6, wearing their invisibility cloaks ran up to the building and slapped a 97 foot long upside down T shaped charge. Then they detonated it from atop a moving truck in New Jersey.

a reply to: neutronflux

Don't forget the team of Mossad Topiary Agents that trimmed the tree into the shape of a passing jet engine.

I thought it was a cloaked UFO. The pentagon collapsed when it completed repairs and flew off?

a reply to: waypastvne

Don't forget the team of Mossad Topiary Agents

Its the evil Joos again .... !!!!

They are responsible for everything ....!!

a reply to: firerescue


Mossad Topiary Agents practicing for the event at their Top Secrete Joo Base.



As they say: Picks or it didn't happen.

originally posted by: theruthlessone
all 3 buildings fell down at free fall speed...... World trade center 7 never even got hit by a plane

Case closed........ Demolition job

Funny how when you see a hoax you call it for what it's enthusiastically but when it's a hoax you've long fell for, you don't call it.

The towers did not fall at free fall:
Neither did building 7:

Also building 7 was heavily damaged from debris and burned hot for several hours. Even the firefighters on scene hours before it collapsed believed it was coming down. One of them even comments in a video it's buckling, will come down, and they cna't do anything about it.

The towers fell in 10 seconds and were
1362 feet tall.. carry the 3...
Free fall.

originally posted by: UnderKingsPeak
The towers fell in 10 seconds and were
1727 feet tall.. carry the 3...
Free fall.

If you watch the videos, you will note debris free falling from the upper floors passing the remaining structure during the collapse.

Not a free fall collapse.

how do fires of carpet and office supplies
on the 93 floor demolish progressively
thicker and thicker steel and concrete for the next
1000 feet in 10 sec ?
At just about free fall speed ?

originally posted by: UnderKingsPeak


free fall speed ?

Free fall is not a speed.

The proper term is free fall acceleration.

There is a difference between speed and acceleration.

Learn what the difference is so you don't look silly.

originally posted by: UnderKingsPeak
how do fires of carpet and office supplies
on the 93 floor demolish progressively
thicker and thicker steel and concrete for the next
1000 feet in 10 sec ?
At just about free fall speed ?

You forgot about the roughly forty five thousand tonnes of the top floors. Getting larger with each successive floor.

We can all agree that it wasn't free fall speed though (whatever that is)

originally posted by: waypastvne
a reply to: neutronflux

Don't forget the team of Mossad Topiary Agents that trimmed the tree into the shape of a passing jet engine.

This is what you guys are high-fiving over? What point are you trying to disprove anyway?

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed


This is what you guys are high-fiving over? What point are you trying to disprove anyway?

We are having a laugh at the truth movements expense. Isn't it obvious.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

The truth movement has made a mockery of a tragic event by dismissing the scores of civilian accounts of a large jet hitting the pentagon, enabling a hack conspiracy industry to exploit 9/11 for personal gain, and push impossible scenarios over reality. Example, a salt water damaged missile who knows how it was effected by an explosion and sinking of a sub was stolen by an overseas team, repaired by technicians, and retro fitted to strike the pentagon was used because using a bought missile would create too much of a paper trail. The truth movement is a joke...

a reply to: UnderKingsPeak

progressively thicker and thicker steel and concrete f

You need to look at how the buildings were designed.

The steel wasn't progressively thicker.
The only concrete was light weight concrete floor slabs.

The design was weak from the beginning.
An outer tube of steel. (Which could never support itself to that height.)
An inner steel core. ( Which could never stay upright itself to that height.)
Both braced by flimsy floor trusses. (Like the roof trusses at your local Walmart.)
If any one of the three failed the whole building failed.