a reply to: Salander
Let's start like this.....
Like how you completely ignore logical questions that break the CD theories. And you counter with impossible molten steel for three months BS. Your
credibility just tanked.
One, no report of sparks or molten metal from the WTC phone calls.
Two, no visible molten metal or sparks in the video posted at the start of this thread. Yet there were pools of molten steel at the WTC?
Three, how would steel stay molten for three months?
Three, A: you use to attribute it to nuclear devices. Which is a false conclusion.
Three, B: there was never any evidence or recorded data the pile was ever hot enough to promote molten steel.
Three C, I don't care what process, there is no logical reason the pile would support molten steel for three months. Thermite reacts in an inert
atmosphere, so even the false theory of thermite is not an explanation. The thermite would have been consumed all at the time of collapse.
Three D, molten steel reacts violently when sprayed with water. Water was used liberally to keep the smoldering material in check, keep the the heat
down, and to keep the smoldering material from catching fire.
Three E, there was enough heat and smoldering/burning material that could produce red hot steel. And combinations of plastics, ash, and embers. Items
that were mistaken for molten steel.
The claim I back was the fires were hot enough for the floor trusses to loose up to 60 percent of their strength. They drooped. Once they started to
cool, they contracted, pulling and buckling the outer vertical columns.
Ever see a ball bounce. If it was impossible for the falling mass of the Towers to collide and cause ejection, then it would be impossible to drop a
steel ball bearing to have it bounce up into the air after hitting a concrete floor.