It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Jr and Manafort will get interview, not testify at public hearing

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:13 PM
link   
I think it's appropriate. At a public hearing those people keep saying I'm not going to comment on that, I will not answer, not in a public setting. So it's pointless. They get a private interview where they can speak their minds rather than not answer questions like those others did at public hearings.

www.nbcnews.com...




posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:16 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

I'm glad that was changed! We'll have less of a circus, from the liberal media clowns next week. They've been building up the hype all week. Love it!



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye
So does that mean they will not have to testify under oath? Or can they be called out on any lies?


edit on 21-7-2017 by JohnnyCanuck because: yes



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:18 PM
link   
.........

have agreed to be interviewed by staff of the Senate Judiciary Committee


by staff ?

well at least the leaks will be interesting !




posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: allsee4eye
So does that mean they will not have to testify under oath? Or can they be called out on any lies?



Hillary Clinton was "interviewed" on more than one occasion regarding her alleged crimes. She was NOT sworn in prior to the interview.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 08:19 PM
link   
I understood that any interview was a prelim to a public hearing later, I can't see NBC saying otherwise.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 08:19 PM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Maybe they should just refuse to talk at all,
sure seems to be acceptable from all the Democrats!



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

Is it still under oath? If it's not under oath it's pointless. Remember that time GWB gave an interview rather than testify under oath to justify a war? People saw through it right away, and it was the end of his broad war support. Hiding from the critics is no way to maintain approval.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: allsee4eye
So does that mean they will not have to testify under oath? Or can they be called out on any lies?



Hillary Clinton was "interviewed" on more than one occasion regarding her alleged crimes. She was NOT sworn in prior to the interview.


Lying to the FBI is still a crime, whether she was under oath or not.



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

Maybe they should just refuse to talk at all,
sure seems to be acceptable from all the Democrats!

Did you hear me asking about Hillary or the Democrats? Is this what's referred to as 'triggered'?



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: allsee4eye
So does that mean they will not have to testify under oath? Or can they be called out on any lies?



It is against the law to lie to congress under oath or not...



posted on Jul, 24 2017 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
a reply to: allsee4eye
So does that mean they will not have to testify under oath? Or can they be called out on any lies?



It is against the law to lie to congress under oath or not...


But it's not against the law to forget.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join