It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stop Making this About Clinton.

page: 10
25
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Trump is the most polarising politician in living memory, most of us thought that it cold never have gotten worse than George. W. Bush but the people of America have proven the rest of us wrong by electing the embodiment of the elite, Donald. J. Trump to the highest office.


How about the last administration? You didn't find that more polarizing than Bush? I think after 911 the people came together, but 8 years under Obama and his cronies is what created the polarization we see today. Obama's my way or the highway was OK with you but Trump now isn't? GIVE ME A BREAK!! lol

Trump walked into a well evolved polarization and we see it with the left not even accepting him as their president for a start. We saw it with the left calling him the worst president in history BEFORE he even took office. Trump did not create BLM, 99%ers and a dozen of other anarchist/radical left groups..Obama did...

STOP blaming the right for everything when the left was large and in charge the last 8 years and screwed it all up...geez...

What 'my way or the highway' are you referring to?

The fact that the GOP tried to keep Obama from (a) being elected and (b) being successful at anything?
Note, they blocked a ridiculous amount of nominees - so many that in order to get any passed, Democrats were forced into a nuclear option (save for SCOTUS). Speaking of blocking, do you remember the 11 month (and counting) block on Obama's SCOTUS nominee by the GOP?

Look at the GOP - they can't even pass a healthcare bill - and they have A MAJORITY IN EVERY SINGLE BRANCH. They couldn't muster 50 votes FOR THEIR OWN THING. Their way is NO WAY since 2008 - apparently regardless of who is in office.




posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe




Actually, Obama was the most polarizing....hence all the riots and stuff....remember those...every week


No one remembers that. Because it's a lie.


So racial tensions improved under Obama? LGBT relations improved? Republican Democrat relations improved? US Foreign relations improved?

There wasn't a week that went by without racial relations and tensions being brought up.


And where did you read about this?

Right-wing media?



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:24 PM
link   



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:27 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth



There is no Trump criticism - the thread is about posters comparing Trump actions to Clinton's.


I wasn't talking about just this thread. But of course you know that, if you read my previous posts properly. Otherwise, it appears we have hit that "brick wall" in which you have no intelligent response to give.



You seem a little tired.


Ya. Like I said, nothing intelligent to contribute.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



There is no Trump criticism - the thread is about posters comparing Trump actions to Clinton's.


I wasn't talking about just this thread. But of course you know that, if you read my previous posts properly. Otherwise, it appears we have hit that "brick wall" in which you have no intelligent response to give.



You seem a little tired.


Ya. Like I said, nothing intelligent to contribute.


So you are deflecting to other threads.
You're getting yourself in a bit of a tangle again.


edit on 21/7/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



There is no Trump criticism - the thread is about posters comparing Trump actions to Clinton's.


I wasn't talking about just this thread. But of course you know that, if you read my previous posts properly. Otherwise, it appears we have hit that "brick wall" in which you have no intelligent response to give.



You seem a little tired.


Ya. Like I said, nothing intelligent to contribute.


So you are deflecting to other threads.
You're getting yourself in a bit of a tangle again.



What tangle? I maintain my original assertion and it appears after a bit of debate you are going derpish.

We've established that you are a hypocrite and you don't deny that, while trying to shame hypocrites. Which makes you dishonest as well.

Deflection seems to be your "tool of choice" and even though the OP called people out on that tactic, you want to double-down on it...using it as your best excuse for doing what you do.

Spin and deflection.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

He's just #ing with you, engaging you in nothing to keep it going because it's fun to him.

Just ignore him.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



There is no Trump criticism - the thread is about posters comparing Trump actions to Clinton's.


I wasn't talking about just this thread. But of course you know that, if you read my previous posts properly. Otherwise, it appears we have hit that "brick wall" in which you have no intelligent response to give.



You seem a little tired.


Ya. Like I said, nothing intelligent to contribute.


So you are deflecting to other threads.
You're getting yourself in a bit of a tangle again.



What tangle? I maintain my original assertion and it appears after a bit of debate you are going derpish.

We've established that you are a hypocrite and you don't deny that, while trying to shame hypocrites. Which makes you dishonest as well.

Deflection seems to be your "tool of choice" and even though the OP called people out on that tactic, you want to double-down on it...using it as your best excuse for doing what you do.

Spin and deflection.



Loving your attacks


I think what we actually established was that comparing the left's ambivalence to Clinton transgressions with their outrage at Trump for the most minor of issues is a good way to highlight the left''s obvious hypocrisy.

Beyond that, all I can see is you ranting in frustration.

As for me denying any of your attacks, well not likely... much better to laugh at them.

edit on 21/7/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: introvert

He's just #ing with you, engaging you in nothing to keep it going because it's fun to him.

Just ignore him.


Oh, I know.

It's the pigeon on the chessboard move.

Still entertaining to point it out.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: introvert

He's just #ing with you, engaging you in nothing to keep it going because it's fun to him.

Just ignore him.


Oh, I know.

It's the pigeon on the chessboard move.

Still entertaining to point it out.


We finished playing chess a while ago, your king lies on it's side.
I don't know what game you are playing now, but it is entertaining. I love watching a good meltdown. It reminds me of Clinton's presidential campaign.
edit on 21/7/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: introvert

He's just #ing with you, engaging you in nothing to keep it going because it's fun to him.

Just ignore him.


Oh, I know.

It's the pigeon on the chessboard move.

Still entertaining to point it out.


We finished playing chess a while ago, your king lies on it's side.
I don't know what game you are playing now, but it is entertaining. I love watching a good meltdown. It reminds me of Clinton's presidential campaign.




posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?


Good meme, though - I wonder why you felt the need to post it

edit on 21/7/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven


Look at the GOP - they can't even pass a healthcare bill - and they have A MAJORITY IN EVERY SINGLE BRANCH. They couldn't muster 50 votes FOR THEIR OWN THING. Their way is NO WAY since 2008 - apparently regardless of who is in office.


Its called litigation and debate.. something the liberals don't seem to want to do with their vote on it first then read it mentality.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?

Would "Trumpkin" be more appriopriate?



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?

Would "Trumpkin" be more appriopriate?


To who?



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?

Would "Trumpkin" be more appriopriate?


To who?

Everyone. You're here trying to justify deflecting from Trump.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 06:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?

Would "Trumpkin" be more appriopriate?


To who?

Everyone. You're here trying to justify deflecting from Trump.


Everyone?

edit on 21/7/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?

Would "Trumpkin" be more appriopriate?


To who?

Everyone. You're here trying to justify deflecting from Trump.


Everyone?

Everyone except Trumpkins.



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?

Would "Trumpkin" be more appriopriate?


To who?

Everyone. You're here trying to justify deflecting from Trump.


Everyone?

Everyone except Trumpkins.


You'll need to define a "Trumpkin".



posted on Jul, 21 2017 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Conservative?

Would "Trumpkin" be more appriopriate?


To who?

Everyone. You're here trying to justify deflecting from Trump.


Everyone?

Everyone except Trumpkins.


You'll need to define a "Trumpkin".

One of the attributes is defending Trump's shortcomings by deflecting to Hillary.



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join