posted on Jul, 19 2017 @ 11:38 AM
a reply to: whereislogic
Well, he is offering a hypothesis, without really explaining how he got there. He explains why he wont expand on it further. Tells me I should
meditate to figure it out... says it is because it will affect my perspective and infringe on my possible experience of his hypothesis IF I decide to
meditate. Who is he to tell me that I am unable to understand his "profound" realization without meditating? What if I have already meditated on alike
concepts and feel like I understand - but how i got there is by a completely different (thought) path?
Now is probably the time someone comes and says: "But, youknow, it´s a universal truth that can only be heard if you listen to the whispers of the
cosmos- hence meditate on youknow... the universe and stuff..."
I am probably coming off as an arrogant prick- but so doe's the OP (and I am sure we both do not mean to).
His way of putting his thoughts out there (without any real explanation of how he reached the conclusion), is at best an interesting exercise in being
creative. At worst, fuel for manic people and their mania, trapped in their own little thought-bubbles.
On a really sincere level - I would really like to hear/read what thoughts (if only a rough sketch of them) led him to this hypothesis. I would like
to think that I have matured enough to realize everyones path is different- also in their heads (thus the fear of polluting my unformed ideas is
uncalled for by OP).
With this all said, I regularly bust myself being a hypocrite.
edit on America/Chicago40Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:40:45 -05001100000019 by eirgud because: trying to make myself clearer...