It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Libs - CNN and "Russian Collusion"

page: 2
8
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

No worries

When it comes out that the former administration sanctioned the USA ic to spy on its political opponents, most of the bs in the msm right now will blow away.
Or dont you remember the "trail of breadcrumbs" the stupid dnc left to prove their illegal spying activities?


But WHO is going to recommend or bring formal charges? Certainly not the spineless "swamp" Congress or DOJ we have today.




posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

No worries

When it comes out that the former administration sanctioned the USA ic to spy on its political opponents, most of the bs in the msm right now will blow away.
Or dont you remember the "trail of breadcrumbs" the stupid dnc left to prove their illegal spying activities?


would that be when they taped trump's election team talking to known russian spies they were tapping that republicans then claimed was illegal because hillary?



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:03 PM
link   
a reply to: growler

perhaps you should review what it takes to be "unmasked"
just because you speak to someone does not give the govt the right to spy on you



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert

No worries

When it comes out that the former administration sanctioned the USA ic to spy on its political opponents, most of the bs in the msm right now will blow away.
Or dont you remember the "trail of breadcrumbs" the stupid dnc left to prove their illegal spying activities?


That's a different matter altogether that has little or nothing to do with what I said.

Again, you are deflecting.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Outlier13

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Outlier13

There is no need for the MSM to spin any of this. All they need to do is report on the mess that Trump and his team have created.

Blaming the MSM is dishonest when it is Trump and friends that put themselves in this position.


Have you seriously been in a cave for the past 12 months? You're either joking, trolling, or ignorant. That is all the MSM has done.


The MSM has not simply made this crap up. This entire ordeal would not be in the news if Trump and those around him had not put themselves in this position.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Sessions?
The ic has a stake in this as their 702 is up for renewal. How are the gop going to authorize spying powers that will be shown to have been used against american citizens? Citizens that were political opponents at the time the intelligence was gathered?



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:28 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

No the matters are joined.
The former administration should have followed the law.
If the meeting trump jr released the email chain about is shown to have been under surveillance, and the american citizens names unmasked, this is big big trouble. The reporter at the nyt was said to have sat on this story WHICH WAS LEAKED for over a YEAR.
So yeah leaking intel info about a political opponent is the same matter.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody



No the matters are joined. The former administration should have followed the law. If the meeting trump jr released the email chain about is shown to have been under surveillance, and the american citizens names unmasked, this is big big trouble. The reporter at the nyt was said to have sat on this story WHICH WAS LEAKED for over a YEAR


We have no idea at this point whether the Obama Admin broke any laws. The names may have been unmasked legally.

What you are forgetting is that the media would not be talking about this and no names would have potentially needed to be unmasked if Trump and people around him were not engaging is suspicious activity.

A point that seems to go over people's heads. Or in your case, a point being deflected away from.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Outlier13



Maybe you should re-read the definition of collusion. There will never be any evidence of collusion because there never was collusion. You kind of missed the point of the thread. The left continually changes the narrative based on how weak their argument becomes over time.

Like most Trump supporters you have a problem with the English language. Here is the definition of collusion.



noun: collusion secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.

Dimwit Jr went to that meeting with the sole purpose of getting dirt on Hillary. That is collusion no matter how much the Trumpkins cry it isn't.
Wanna make America great again? First step go beg a foreign government for help. What great Americans.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




What you are forgetting is that the media would not be talking about this and no names would have potentially needed to be unmasked if Trump and people around him were not engaging is suspicious activity.

lol
"suspicious activity"
nice
good luck with that one buddy

When the aholes who broke the law point to "suspicious activity" even you know there is a problem.

lol The greatest ic on the planet investigating for over a year now and you use "suspicious activity" lol

I wonder if rice will use that tomorrow...."suspicious activity" you are a laff riot.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Outlier13

Dimwit Jr went to that meeting with the sole purpose of getting dirt on Hillary. That is collusion no matter how much the Trumpkins cry it isn't.

Wanna make America great again? First step go beg a foreign government for help. What great Americans.


If seeking information for the purposes of beating your political, business, or sports opponent is "collusion", then so be it. I don't understand why people get so hung up on that word.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 01:54 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody



lol "suspicious activity" nice good luck with that one buddy


I don't need luck. We know for a fact that Trump and people around him are under investigation for their suspicious activity.

Do you deny that?



When the aholes who broke the law point to "suspicious activity" even you know there is a problem.


You don't know if any laws were broken.



lol The greatest ic on the planet investigating for over a year now and you use "suspicious activity" lol


Ya. That's why they are under investigation.



I wonder if rice will use that tomorrow...."suspicious activity" you are a laff riot.


I wonder if you could address the topic at hand without deflecting on to someone else.

Did Rice or the media put Trump and friends in this position?

No. That is on them.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




I don't need luck. We know for a fact that Trump and people around him are under investigation for their suspicious activity. Do you deny that?

Nope
the investigation has been going on since july of 16
perhaps you should go back and read some of the senate and congressional hearing transcripts(testimony given UNDER OATH)
oh and any indictments from that investigation?



You don't know if any laws were broken.

again I will direct you to above mentioned hearings testimony
702's,and unmasking and leaks were quite the topic of some of those discussions
perhaps you should reacquaint yourself with them before tomorrows hearing


the latest "breaking" story was held for a year......why would a reporter hold a story for a year?



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody



Nope the investigation has been going on since july of 16 perhaps you should go back and read some of the senate and congressional hearing transcripts(testimony given UNDER OATH) oh and any indictments from that investigation?


The investigation is not over yet. When the investigation is over and they say no charges will be filed, you can use that argument. Until then, it's illogical. Not sure why that has become an acceptable argument.



again I will direct you to above mentioned hearings testimony 702's,and unmasking and leaks were quite the topic of some of those discussions perhaps you should reacquaint yourself with them before tomorrows hearing


You still can't prove any laws were broken.

Again, you are not addressing the topic at hand and are deflecting.

There would be nothing to any of this if Trump and team had not put themselves in this position. But go ahead and talk about Rice, if it makes you feel better.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:44 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Man...seriously you need to revisit this from the beginning. The entire "Russian Collusion" narrative is 100% a fabrication from the MSM driven by the DC establishment and the deep state. The intel agencies showed their hidden hand by releasing classified information to the Washington Post. How the hell else would the Washington Post gain access to classified information? And on top of that the info was false leading the WP and the NYT to retract their stories.

Across the board you can find people in the MSM stating there is not going to be any evidence of collusion because there is no collusion.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




You still can't prove any laws were broken.

And the potus broke what laws exactly?
the former fbi director told trump 3 times that he was not under investigation(sworn testimony)

keep digging though
you will expose more of the former administrations lack of respect for the law and its citizens



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Outlier13



Man...seriously you need to revisit this from the beginning. The entire "Russian Collusion" narrative is 100% a fabrication from the MSM driven by the DC establishment and the deep state.


Uh huh. Sure. More deep state nonsense.

The latest revelations in this case suggest collusion is quite possible.



Across the board you can find people in the MSM stating there is not going to be any evidence of collusion because there is no collusion.


Who cares?

I'll wait for the investigations to end and see what they have to say.

You would be wise to do the same before you dismiss the possibilities.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert




You still can't prove any laws were broken.

And the potus broke what laws exactly?
the former fbi director told trump 3 times that he was not under investigation(sworn testimony)

keep digging though
you will expose more of the former administrations lack of respect for the law and its citizens


I don't have to keep digging. The investigators are doing that because of Trump and his teams actions.

But you keep trying to blame and deflect on to others. Whatever makes you feel better.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: Outlier13

Dimwit Jr went to that meeting with the sole purpose of getting dirt on Hillary. That is collusion no matter how much the Trumpkins cry it isn't.

Wanna make America great again? First step go beg a foreign government for help. What great Americans.


If seeking information for the purposes of beating your political, business, or sports opponent is "collusion", then so be it. I don't understand why people get so hung up on that word.

He did it with a government that has been consider our number one enemy for decades and you say so be it? What kind of American are you?



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody



oh and any indictments from that investigation?

Kind of hard to get those things when the person running it gets fired.




top topics



 
8
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join