In politics the policy is called pro-discrimination , based on the idea that it is fair to discriminate against those who benefit from a system which
already discriminates for them . This is no way a fair approach . Being forced to accept the non-existent problem of 'rascism' yet ? Its not only
whites you can accuse of rascism either . Any excuse to pre-determine someone's treatment based solely on the colour of their skin is evil , Tony
Blair and Labourites who enacted this policy in the uk , ought to be ashamed . It is absolute traitordom , where we as citizens are subject to
decision-making as a nation : National policies affect British Nationals , national laws affect them too . Nobody else's laws , but their_ nations
laws re what they are subject to.
And, the 'system' does not discriminate for/pro white people . It discriminates numerically as an arithmatocracy first and foremost . That is such an
under-recognised fact that the spellchecker doesnt know the word . Its something that even all governments of the world remain subject to , and the
banks are there to check _numbers , not racial id .
Why does pro-discrimination get any allowances ? How come our countries are filling up with immigrants . Theres a lot to it of course , but what
happens along the way is that the EU say , or the US , have provaricated to be all compassionate and welcoming to African migrants for example , while
at the same time screwing Africa itself for all it is worth , by excluding african countries from trading in their 'zone' for a prime example .
Bombing , say Libya , on a whim for another .
Plus , multiculturalism provides the chances to water down democracy and destroy any sense of racial or national pride , or original 'post-war
culture' left in the West , because these 'old' ideas of nationhood amongst others are dangerous to the international regime of the numerical
dominators . They want to reduce the nation called 'The United Kingdom' down to a local jurisdiction of a Federal Europe , that's what we,ve been up
are like worms in the propaganda soup , making it unpalateable
How do feminists have a right to pre-determine how to treat to men , either ? There ain't exactly any masculinists in sociology eh what ? The
spellchecks never heard of it either ! But it is a dangerous ideology which has the power to dominate when used as a tool as it sometimes is . Real
feminist perspectives have been extremely pertinent however , according to the particular researcher
Perspectives such as feminism and its twisted sister pro-discrimination become outdated with morphing realities . If men don't dominate women anymore
and white don't dominate blacks as it used to be , then people taking up these tools in this day and current western climate are likely to have
malintentions . Therefore the article could be seen as an excuse to help disempower a racially motivated selection of the population , as they are the
predominant inhabitants of western national democrocracies , while weakening this portion enhances local govt power through disenfranchisement from
their original ancestry in terms of citizenship .
What we all want is to see that justice is fair . And fair it is when it makes its timely visits to life , rare enough though
edit on 17-7-2017
by ZIPMATT because: (no reason given)