It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So wat if Trump colluded with Russia to win?

page: 5
6
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 08:15 PM
link   
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

You are the one evoking that imagry, not me. Now go on with your bad old self - you have some surfing to do!




posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 08:22 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

YOU? Yeah, I know.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: TacSite18
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I get it now. You like to watch!

Must be tough to find really specific porn sites that cater to "old white man dominated by middle-aged black man".

But the internet is a big place. Good surfing!



Clearly you have run out of anything of relevance to say. But please, feel free to continue on with your homo-erotic and wife-beating fantasies.



It's an old joke but seems appropriate....

punchline.....

"then quit showing me those dirty pictures"
edit on 16-7-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 08:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

BEFORE he was elected make the decision for America to help an adversary nation rig our elections.


So basically you can't come up with a single thing that Trump has done as President that is a benefit to Russia. What was the point of them rigging it in his favor then? Obama gives them Crimea, Hillary gives them 25% of US Uranium, why on Earth would they rig it for Trump when they are getting such fantastic gifts from democrats, and he is giving them nothing?


Gave them Crimea?

Seems a bit silly to gift things that don't belong to you and then cripple the economy of the country receiving said gift because of the gift itself.

Gave them Uranium mines too you say?

Trade deals, Russia produces plenty of uranium, one of it's "former" member's of the USSR, Kazakhstan. Is the world's largest provider of Uranium.

The Clinton's did not have the power or authority to sign off on those deals, that was down to nuclear regulation authorities and others.

You're basically saying that the NRC and others are inept and not to be trusted, if that's the case then you have a big BIG ####ing problem.

Like seriously, do you even think about what you've wrote?

The US should be an irradiated wasteland by now with all these incapable commie loving traitors running things that's as important as nuclear security.

Lol



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 08:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Psht.. I have yet to make 1 deal with a foreign powers intelligence agency.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 08:50 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers died fighting for Crimea in the Crimea war. Even if millions of Russians die in war, taking back Crimea is one thing the Russian people must do.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 08:53 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

NATO is Washington treaty. Without America, there is no NATO. Without any other NATO country, there is NATO. As for Flynn, he can say Trump will chop his head off and give it to Putin. So what? Flynn doesn't speak for Trump.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

No Flynn was specifically in the capacity as a spokesman for the president..

He was his forien advisor lol.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:03 PM
link   
It is cartoon bad....

a reply to: allsee4eye



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:04 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Where's the proof Flynn said Trump will drop sanctions?



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

Millions upon millions of Russians died forming the USSR, most of them outside of combat and by the hands of their fellow comrades.

Should Russia take back half of Europe and all the other lands lost due to the falling of the wall?

These lands of which we speak have had many claims, over many centuries. Should the Turks or Austria have a claim too? Heck might as well throw the Brits and French in too, including nations that were not even formed when the Crimean war occurred.

Because the Russia of then isn't the Russia of today, it's had a few changes since then. It's not the same nation. It would be like me saying modern day Britain should demand the ownership of India to be handed back to them. Because it used to belong to the British empire.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:10 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

That's such an interesting question as far as ancestral homes.. what counts?? what doesn't??



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Crimea is ethnic Russian majority. It was illegally given to Ukraine. So Russia has the right to take it back.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:38 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

Demographics...

A good portion of Northern European ethnicity originates from German ancestry lines, yet Germany is a very young nation. So how should we divide up Europe then?

Maybe Ukraine owns Russia then? Since there was that Cossack revolution and all... Or maybe someone should start a slavic empire?

Again communist Russia is not the modern day one and certainly isn't the Russia that existed under the Tsars. Your claims of entitlement become very silly very quickly.

Maybe we should give Europe back to the neanderthals?



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:40 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Germany lost a lot of land after WW1 and after WW2. Kaliningrad used to be Konigsberg. That's what happens when a nation loses war.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

That's a difficult question.

Cultural identity would play a big part I would guess. Hence why the best approach is asking the people to decide in fair democratic elections.

Because calling up history would never work, we don't want to finalise this stuff and have it trampled by a Eastern revolution of horsemen who don't hold similar views on land entitlement...

We are all Khan...



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 09:57 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

You missed my point entirely and the world has agreed that lands gained by conquest is illegal.

My point was that in terms of ancestry, many Europeans can be traced through to an origin in Modern Germany. Germany is technically as old as WWII, they have no claim to anything other than their own lands, ancestry means little.

Russia is technically only what... 15 years old?

Ancestry cannot change that fella.

Your argument is silly, ethnicity had little to do with the historic carving of Europe, religion did. Christians and Muslims and the denominations within them.

If ethnicity had anything to do with it Europe would be called Celtia or something.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 10:21 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Democracy is looking shaky these days lol..

It's sooo easy to fool the masses.. but then again they have made sure the masses don't vote.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 10:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy

originally posted by: TacSite18
a reply to: TruMcCarthy

I get it now. You like to watch!

Must be tough to find really specific porn sites that cater to "old white man dominated by middle-aged black man".

But the internet is a big place. Good surfing!



Clearly you have run out of anything of relevance to say. But please, feel free to continue on with your homo-erotic and wife-beating fantasies.



It's an old joke but seems appropriate....

punchline.....

"then quit showing me those dirty pictures"


It was Obama and the media who showed us that picture. I'll let you decode that one.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 10:32 PM
link   
a reply to: RAY1990

Pretty shaky defense to say "conquest stops counting today!!"

Even though that is our claim to sovereignty..

Lol







 
6
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join