It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sputniksteve
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: NthOther
Notice how all the Atheists feel the need to come in here and educate everyone on what atheism "really is"?
Because, after all, Atheists are much smarter than the lot of you and they want you to know it.
How that helps anyone or anything other than the Atheist's ego, I have no idea.
Anything to keep the conversation sidetracked.
How do you equate clarifying what atheist actually means - - - to "they think they're smarter - - - and it's ego"?
Have you never had this conversation before? It is quite common to appeal to a low IQ or intelligence for the most frequent reason for believing in "God". I have done it myself more times than I would like to admit. I am not claiming you did that or that it was done in this thread, just pointing out why they might have said that.
originally posted by: SRPrime
It's a very simple explanation. People are spoonfed heaven and "loved ones!!!!" that when they KNOW they are going to die; their brain starts rationalizing for them. As parts of the brain are affected from dying; they start losing sense of reality and very literally hallucinating. They aren't literally talking to dead people, like -- come on, if they were; they'd be able to tell you information that they could not know, and they can't.
89% of the hospice nurses reported patients who experienced a DBC had a peaceful and calm death, with only 40.5% reporting a peaceful and calm death without the DBC.
...
tend to be of short duration, and that in 62% of cases reported in their study the patient died within 24 hours of reporting or showing signs of such a vision
originally posted by: VegHead
Wow - what an intriguing story. I hope everyone clicks on that link to read your previous post. This was a near death vision (actually I'm not sure if the patient was near death) that gave the patient info she wouldn't have through apparent "natural" means. Thanks for posting that link and sharing your perspective!
originally posted by: sputniksteve
That is where you are absolutely wrong!!
I am telling you right now, there are instances where that is exactly what they are able to do. People that are dead and otherwise "occupied" are able to give information that they absolutely could not have collected through their own faculties unless consciousness was non local or not dependent on any physical interaction. And I do mean dead, not kind of dead or in a coma but dead.
originally posted by: VegHead
a reply to: Ridhya
Excellent points... she did say a few saw "Jesus" but the vast majority who report DBVs to her see dead loved ones. Also in a few cases she said people saw someone they did not recognize at all. Of course many aren't speaking at all and do not have an apparent DBV.
Seeing dead loved ones at the point of death isn't really in line with Christian beliefs... but I agree that this has become a Western cultural "expectation". Along the lines of seeing a light at the end of a tunnel. The brain could subconsciously pull from these cultural references at the point of death as a coping mechanism.
But if our brains and bodies are simply being kind to us to help us deal with the dying process, you still have to wonder why? This serves no biological advantage that would allow natural selection to act upon it... right?
originally posted by: Annee
I am atheist.
Atheist simply means "Lack of believe in a God".
It does not mean anything else. Like not believing there is more going on then we can see.
I believe consciousness is energy. That the energy consciousness continues after physical death.
If I saw a past relative/friend at my death time - - I would still be atheist.
originally posted by: mrperplexed
a reply to: mysterioustranger
And yet if there is a God he or she or it ignores our plea's and allows us to get maimed, disfigured, PTSD'd and killed... Awesome....
Dr. Rick Strassman, a Stanford University graduate with a specialization in psychiatry and psychopharmacology, is the torchbearer behind the idea that '___' is released when we are born and when we die. He took on a five year project to investigate the effects of '___', and administered about 400 doses of the drug to nearly five dozen heavily pre-screened volunteers. Throughout his work, him and his team coined a new rating scale called the Hallucinogen Rating Scale (HRS), which has been widely accepted throughout the international research community — over 45 articles have documented its use as a solid instrument for measuring psychological effects.
Interestingly, based on his extensive research and observations, Dr. Strassman hypothesizes that when a person is approaching death or possibly even just in a dream state, the body releases relatively large amounts of '___'. The majority of his volunteers reported profound encounters with non-humans and deep spiritual experiences, and Dr. Strassman believes that '___' could explain some of the wild imagery described by survivors of near-death experiences as well as those recounting their dreams.
However, although this hypothesis has yet to be confirmed with scientific evidence, Strassman’s research did produce some striking facts about '___'.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Annee
I am agnostic, and certainly not religious in the organized religion sense, but I am totally open to the idea that consciousness exists beyond the physical.
Thank you.
I've had too many "experiences" since first memory to discount that there isn't more going on.
There are many Spiritual Atheists. Atheists that believe consciousness continues after physical death.
Not understanding what atheist actually means, is the problem with those who think these experiences mean belief in a God.