CIA agent, Malcom Howard: "I brought down WTC 7"

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

Or one fire in the corner of the 13th floor....I don't know why demo companies bother....

originally posted by: Flatcoat

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

Or one fire in the corner of the 13th floor....I don't know why demo companies bother....

Only it wasn't just one fire on the 13th floor was it. The Building had been extensively damaged by thousands of tons of steel and concrete from the twin towers collapse.

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation.

Erm - you have just described exactly what the guy said.

In a couple of weeks the CIA will announce it has no person with this name in their records. A few days after that it will be revealed that he was in a mental hospital on 9/11, or that he once confessed to being a JFK shooter, or something similar.

Maybe I'm just being a bit simple but.....

Fact - Mossad knew exactly what was going to happen and when.

True or false - US Intelligence agencies knew what Mossad knew ?


If true the guy's story is probably just the tip of the iceberg.

A quick search reveals that this story is ONLY being carried out by known hoax/fake news purveyors I can find nothing whatsoever elsewhere to support it. Who did he allegedly give this confession to? Even the picture in the article is of some random old man not the person in question. There's even the obligatory youtube video about it....sigh

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001,

Four years long enough for ya?

originally posted by: prevenge

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001,

Four years long enough for ya?

4 years is plenty, but for what. Insurance fraud?

originally posted by: prevenge
Thought I'd share this lil nugget thats been making its rounds across the net today...

79-year-old retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard, has made a series of astonishing claims since being released from hospital in New Jersey on Friday and told he has weeks to live. Mr. Howard claims he was involved in the “controlled demolition” of World Trade Center 7, the third building that was destroyed on 9/11.

Link: CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11’

“When the building came down, it was such a rush. Everything went exactly to plan. It was so smooth. Everybody was evacuated. Nobody was hurt in WTC 7. We were celebrating. We kept watching replays of the demolition, we had the whiskey and cigars out, and then all of a sudden the strangest thing happened. We all started to worry that it looked a bit too smooth. We watched the tape again and again and again and we started to get paranoid. It looked like a controlled demolition. We thought #, people are going to question this. And then we heard that people from the street were reporting that they heard the explosions during the afternoon. When we were told that the BBC botched their report and announced to the world that the building collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did… At that point we really thought the gig was up.”

If this is true, then they're definitely serving this information out intentionally.

Interesting, 9/11 could be a double edged sword...
The first edge, the event, to get into the middle East...
The second edge, admitting to it.

That very information, that revelation, would be more powerful than the event itself, considering the amount of global backlash that would ensue...

Guess it's right on time for WWIII and the TPTB's retreat to the bunker cities...

This building was an intentional and fully authorised self-destruct......simple.

Of course they want this out now....lol.....the Mayor knew because he was a part of the process.

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: prevenge

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To Bring a building of that size down with explosives would take weeks of preparation. It's not like in a video game where you run around planting dynamite sticks with timers attached onto walls and pillars.

The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed “New Century” between May 1997 and September 2001,

Four years long enough for ya?

4 years is plenty, but for what. Insurance fraud?

Insurance fraud was an anticipated sympathetic byproduct of a multi-pronged intention behind the bigger picture action.This building was pre-wired...intentionally by the Government as SOP......ALL buildings that went down are keystone waypoints hidden within the tapestry of the bigger picture.

Its interesting how when something that is obviously "fake news" is going to go towards confirming that confirmation bias then its floated around ATS like the Gosbel yet if its from CNN then its fake news.

Yournewswire is fake news, yet we seem to be very selective about what we actually treat as fake news if it fits in with our preconceived beliefs.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Its interesting how when something that is obviously "fake news" is going to go towards confirming that confirmation bias then its floated around ATS like the Gosbel yet if its from CNN then its fake news.

Yournewswire is fake news, yet we seem to be very selective about what we actually treat as fake news if it fits in with our preconceived beliefs.

It is an "if the shoe fits wear it" data acceptance scenario......people no longer trust nor validate MSM.....they now use multi-media conduits to form their perspectives ....in the past MSM brainwashed us all......now they impact substantially fewer people.

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: prevenge

This is the same rag that claims an ex mi5 agent confessed to killing princess di.


B.S story.

Well at its most basic level, this man's admission is either a 1 or a 0, it is either true, or it is false.

Given that the building was brought down by CD, my bet is his story is true.

originally posted by: madmac5150
... it's a brutal assumption, however, our Government is run by brutal people...

That's no hypothesis. Just consider the fact that to kill one madman called Saddam the Government kills 200,000 Iraqis, instead of just sending in a team of Seals to take out the one nut.

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Its interesting how when something that is obviously "fake news" is going to go towards confirming that confirmation bias then its floated around ATS like the Gosbel yet if its from CNN then its fake news.

Yournewswire is fake news, yet we seem to be very selective about what we actually treat as fake news if it fits in with our preconceived beliefs.

You can't expect people to not believe things like this when every level of government and media has been caught time and again lying.
What do you expect to happen?

Besides, if it weren't for those towers we couldn't protect our freedom in the middle east. No one knows how our freedom got there, but by god we gotta protect it!

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: prevenge

This is the same rag that claims an ex mi5 agent confessed to killing princess di.


B.S story.

Hate to tell you but most people think Di was killed and not by 'paparazzi'

She even wrote in her own Diary

I mean she even wrote in her diary they were planning to kill her, probably when she was in a car, she thought they'd do the brakes.

www.telegraph.co.uk...


The big conspiracy is, she was pregnant, that means her newest child would have been a Billionaire muslim, brother of the king of England. If you think Old Phillip would allow that I have a bridge to sell you.

So.. CNN and other MSM that typically just give a slant to stories to further an agenda are "fake news" ('cause Trump said so), but.. this ridiculous site that has published dozens of hoax articles is somehow legit? And so it goes with ATS, pushing the boundaries of ludicrous on a daily basis.

I'm surprised that this hasn't been tossed in the hoax bin yet.

a reply to: Chadwickus

BS or not it sounds more plausible than the official story.

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: prevenge

This is the same rag that claims an ex mi5 agent confessed to killing princess di.


B.S story.

It was the SAS and by default that mean's Mi5 probably had involvement as well.
www.express.co.uk...
www.dailymail.co.uk...
www.telegraph.co.uk...

I shall tell you why shall I, they were NOT going to have Dodi Al Fayad married to the mother of the future king of England and I have my own opinion were the order came from but let's just say head of the establishment.

It was not just in one rag mate it was in all of them and by the way most British people believe it even despite the whitewash cover up by the crook's in charge - except died in the wool royalists whom mistakenly probably believed Diana was a traitor when in fact she had MORE royal blood than the Windsor's, at least MORE BRITISH royal blood from the house of Stuart from which she was descended and a little less of that imported house of Hanover blood, it was probably why she was chosen in the first place but once she had given birth to a male heir old Charlie was off after his old flame, her being married and old and wrinkly not withstanding but you see Camilla also has more royal blood as she is descended from a king of England and his mistress.


Back to the main story.