It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proving Spontaneity of Post-Impact WTC Towers Collapse

page: 11
16
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Salander

You?

“So you reject the notion that you ever put on an Analytical Thinker hat?”

Like you claiming nukes brought down the towers?

Like you can cite a credible truth movement narrative that explains the damage at the pentagon? Or how the 30 foot crater, scorched tree, debris field, human remains, and buried jet wreckage ended up at shanksville.

We all know the government should be held to scrutiny.

Your major flaw is you give a pass and have faith in the con artists of the truth movement. You sold your credibility long ago chasing false conspiracy smoking guns.....
edit on 27-12-2017 by neutronflux because: Added quotes

edit on 27-12-2017 by neutronflux because: Fixed and added

edit on 27-12-2017 by neutronflux because: Fixed




posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:11 PM
link   
RJ Lee group found evidence of 3600* F, who can tell me where that heat came from ?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:13 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

naw.....that's not strong for an argument....HAL9000 needs a plug pulled, I saw it on a movie once

I have a pic that demolishes the storyline



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb

yes the firefighters had molten steel three weeks later before it went away

meaning he said they dealt with it daily for two weeks

HAL , what's your take on it

edit on 27-12-2017 by GBP/JPY because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb


That's pretty hot for office fires, even with jetfuel present.

My guess is some sort of nuclear event, same events that left several "hot spots" visible to satellites overhead.



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: GBP/JPY


3 months, is the more generally accepted number for how long the molten iron remained.



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Isen't 3600* F hotter than molten iron?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:20 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb


Probably so. They had plenty of margin to spare.



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: wildb
RJ Lee group found evidence of 3600* F, who can tell me where that heat came from ?


Please somebody cite the source and proof these temperatures existed.



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: GBP/JPY
a reply to: wildb

yes the firefighters had molten steel three weeks later before it went away

meaning he said they dealt with it daily for two weeks

HAL , what's your take on it


You mean pliable steel glowing orange at 940 degrees Celsius.

The towers were a mixture of many items. Noting would be a pure molten anything. Is that false?

Or do you mean a mixture of aluminum, lead, plastics, and burning material that logic actually dictates existed?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 01:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: GBP/JPY


3 months, is the more generally accepted number for how long the molten iron remained.


You mean steel under going chemical attack and heated to red or orange by smoldering fires acting like charcoal under the rubble?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 02:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: wildb


That's pretty hot for office fires, even with jetfuel present.

My guess is some sort of nuclear event, same events that left several "hot spots" visible to satellites overhead.


You mean the claim of 3500 degrees from a source that is not cited? To produce such temperatures by a a nuclear reaction, the nuclear reaction would have to be on par with a nuclear reactor undergoing melt down such as the Fukushima disaster. A nuclear reaction that would produce radiation that would cause daily onsite deaths by everyone working the pile. Contamination that would have been spread by wind,and caused instant sickness. Contamination that would have been picked up by any radiation detectors downwind of the pile states away? Contamination that would have poisoned all of New York city? With instant sickness.

Would you still like to talk about you and your ability to think analytically?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 02:20 PM
link   
neutron baby...they don't want advise on a personal level from a cyber organism or a computer.....cool



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: GBP/JPY
neutron baby...they don't want advise on a personal level from a cyber organism or a computer.....cool


Would like to state something credible? Not the same items that have been debunked year after year. It is sad you have no discernment for truth. And small pockets of individuals like you will not let the proven truth movement con artists fade into total obscurity.

You might find this thread interesting? Talks about individuals that cannot not let go of conspiracy.... in the face of overwhelming evidence and eyewitnesses.....

Anyone familiar with a Patrick Alaggio?
www.internationalskeptics.com...

Remember, I think everyone agrees the government should be held to scrutiny. However, you are blind to the lies of the truth movement that should also be scrutinized?


edit on 27-12-2017 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: GBP/JPY

Molten iron is one of the memes endlessly repeated by conspiracy types .....

Recovery crews did uncover a number of beams heated to red hot by fires in the burning pile

Here is short video of a beam being recovered some 6 weeks after

www.youtube.com...

Comment by FDNY chief estimates temperature of fires at about 1500 F

Irons melts (depending on purity at around 2600 F) Without a forced draft and refractory lining would not generate sufficient heat to melt iron

It took some 3000 years from time iron was first forged to create technology advanced enough to melt it



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: wildb
RJ Lee group found evidence of 3600* F, who can tell me where that heat came from ?


Please somebody cite the source and proof these temperatures existed.


What part of the RJ Lee report do you not understand?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: wildb

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: wildb
RJ Lee group found evidence of 3600* F, who can tell me where that heat came from ?


Please somebody cite the source and proof these temperatures existed.


What part of the RJ Lee report do you not understand?


Can you cite from it?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 03:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: wildb

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: wildb
RJ Lee group found evidence of 3600* F, who can tell me where that heat came from ?


Please somebody cite the source and proof these temperatures existed.


What part of the RJ Lee report do you not understand?


Oh, you are referring to iron spheres?



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: wildb




By: Mick West
www.metabunk.org...

debunked-iron-microspheres-in-9-11-wtc-dust-as-evidence-for-thermite.t2523/

www.metabunk.org...

The iron microspheres (as evidence for thermite) were debunked years ago, but they keep coming up. The bottom line is:

Iron Microspheres form from condensed vaporized iron or from molten iron
You can melt iron by igniting it with a Bic lighter, if the pieces of iron are thin enough.
There are several other sources of iron microspheres
Iron microspheres were expected in the WTC dust

edit on 27-12-2017 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Dec, 27 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: wildb

originally posted by: neutronflux

originally posted by: wildb
RJ Lee group found evidence of 3600* F, who can tell me where that heat came from ?


Please somebody cite the source and proof these temperatures existed.


What part of the RJ Lee report do you not understand?


Can you cite from it?


I'm not going to look it up , but this is the clue they left. What they found was evidence of evaporated Led. Look up the temps needed to do that.

If you want search my posts, I posted the report some time ago and pointed that out, or just google it up.

www.rjlg.com... ts/

911research.wtc7.net...




top topics



 
16
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join