It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proving Spontaneity of Post-Impact WTC Towers Collapse

page: 1
8

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 09:11 PM
link   
Hello all. Europhysics Magazine has an interesting take on the WTC debacle. I don't know the time in which this Magazine came out but I am assuming early 2017. I didn't see anything posted about it so I just wanted to throw this on the site to help keep people updated.

I believe this is the summary.


The cause of collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) in New York on 9/11/2001, clarified mathematically by mechanical analysis, has been questioned by some lay critics without any meaningful calculations. They blame the collapse on controlled demolition, implying some sort of conspiracy. The present article summarizes the reasons why the collapse must have been spontaneous and an inevitable result of the aircraft impact damage and the subsequent fire, and how the collapse is explained by mathematical analysis based on mechanics and confirmed by all the available observations.


Europhysics goes on to explain their position starting at page 18: EuroPhysics

I think it's goofy that they disclaim all attempts at proving something fishy as excusable because they are "lay critics". The Mag had hosted some opposing opinions back in 2016 here on page 21: EuroPhysics . Done by people who don't appear to be "lay".

I can tell you I believe we knew 9/11 was on the way but past that it's all speculation.




posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 10:50 PM
link   
A bunch of Clinton enemies start killing themselves and another inside job denial article show up around the same time?


Hmmm.

Compressed air arse. I've seen the videos. Three buildings in a row fall in on themselves in one day- there's no record of any building with that type of frame falling in on itself. Not one.

And I've run a foundry. I know molten aluminum can eat steel.
It doesn't launch support beams up into the air, though. Not once, not never.

I'm glad this isn't my chair- good luck anyone hoping the government is in your side...



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 11:05 PM
link   
I just had a thought that investigating this Europhysics for any connections to the CFR and other globalists, their executives and their affiliations to certain people, would be revealing as to the veracity of any of their conclusions.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: lordcomac

"A bunch of Clinton enemies start killing themselves and another inside job denial article show up around the same time? "
lol.


"I'm glad this isn't my chair- " I don't get.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 11:39 PM
link   
Europhysics knows very little about
certain areas of physics or they are
playing along.

How does an office fire 93 stories
up cause a spontaneous collapse
of all 110 stories in 10-11 sec ?

It's really getting to be so evident
the OS is poo.Its the religious like
belief in our universities and media
that is holding back the truth.



posted on Jul, 15 2017 @ 12:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Antipathy17

So this "research" was done 16 years later to combat some Wacky Conspiracy Theory that allegedly nobody in their patriotic right mind would entertain?

Hmmm, ok.

NIST revisited and absolute rubbish.



posted on Jul, 16 2017 @ 07:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: lordcomac

It doesn't launch support beams up into the air, though. Not once, not never.

...


Well since this didn't happen on 9/11-there were no support beams launched into the air- what's the relevance to this observation?

Oh, and first, you've got to prove this "launch" claim to be right in the first place.

Otherwise, you prove yourself to be uneducated.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 02:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
I just had a thought that investigating this Europhysics for any connections to the CFR and other globalists, their executives and their affiliations to certain people, would be revealing as to the veracity of any of their conclusions.


It wasn't the conclusions of Europhysics


This feature is somewhat different from our usual purely scientific articles, in that it contains some speculation. However, given the timing and the importance of the issue, we consider that this feature is sufficiently technical and interesting to merit publication for our readers. Obviously, the content of this article is the responsibility of the authors.



posted on Jul, 17 2017 @ 08:24 AM
link   
a reply to: UnderKingsPeak




How does an office fire 93 stories up cause a spontaneous collapse of all 110 stories in 10-11 sec ?

Only people without degrees talk like this.
You have only to ask your local fire department why they won't enter a burning Walmart and you will have your answer.



new topics

top topics



 
8

log in

join