It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Artifacts of Ojuelos de Jalisco

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 08:29 AM
link   
Does anyone have more information on the Artifacts of Ojuelos de Jalisco.
The Mexican government seems to have written them off as tourist trinkets.
But it seem that people have invested alot of time in the set up if that is true.

Can anyone point me to a prior discussion on ATS if available?





posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 09:11 AM
link   
a reply to: ChrisM101

Try this...typed "Jalisco" in the search engine.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Or just create your own...there is plenty of info out there fact and fiction.

mexicounexplained.com...
edit on 14/7/2017 by bkfd54 because: Added example



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: ChrisM101

They're pretty obvious fakes.

Now, before you get suspicious about "skeptics debunking everything" let me say why this is so:
* they're supposed to be Aztec but they don't actually get any of the clothing, poses, features, or details right. It's like being shown a picture of a television and someone telling you that this is an oven.
* they're on the wrong material. If an Aztec was going to record something quickly, they would have done so on paper (ala the Codexes) or paint on pottery.
* Something like a UFO showing up and a ruler offering something to it would have been on a huge stone monument with writing indicating what was happening.
* they did not make art on small stones (their tech was not THAT good) though they used smaller polished gemstones to make things like jade masks. They also used shells...but this isn't shell.
* they're badly shaped (Aztec material is usually far more symmetrical.)
* the lines are crudely done. While this is not a complete indication of fakery (there's some really badly done GENUINE artifacts out there, the lack of care involved here is another indication that it's modern.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Byrd

Isnt this area out of the Aztec home Range.



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: bkfd54

So one cites this as a 70's find and the other a more recent 90's find.

Is there any place that has the original 70's era artifacts displayed?



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 12:16 PM
link   
i have nothing to add except the fact that in the 1990's the mexican city of jalisco produced some very good ufo photos, again google is your friend



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 12:37 PM
link   
Looks to me like the fraudulent work of Nassim Haramein and Klaus Dona (some pics.)
Same style, I think.

Harte



posted on Jul, 14 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: ChrisM101
a reply to: Byrd

Isnt this area out of the Aztec home Range.



I double checked. Quite right! Excellent catch!



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join