It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On Monday, the 21st of March 2016 Tatjana Festerling delivered a speech at the weekly demonstration in Dresden.
Her main theme was the extra-parliamentary influences on Chancellor Angela Merkel in the context of mass Islamic migration into Europe. In particular, Frau Festerling draws attention to George Soros’ Project Syndicate (26 September 2015), a six-point “comprehensive plan” or manifesto for managing an annual influx of “at least a million asylum-seekers” into Europe for the “foreseeable future”. The scheme calls for putting into place a highly centralised administration for the management of what amounts to the thinning out of the native European ethnic populations — if that is not putting it too mildly.
The connection between the “comprehensive plan” and its praxis, or between Soros and Angela Merkel, is a little known figure, Gerald Knaus, director of the European Stability Initiative (ESI), a Soros-funded think tank (cf. for example, Open Society under “Current supporters” on the ESI website). Frau Festerling quotes Knaus directly in an interview he gave to Die Welt on 16 March 2016, wherein the ESI director appears recklessly candid, and even boastful about his influence on the politicians. But the newspaper itself states directly that
Gerald Knaus of the think tank ESI worked out the blueprint for Merkel’s asylum policy: close co-operation with Turkey
and refugee quotas.
The European Stability Initiative brought this “blueprint” to completion on 4 October 2015 in a draft proposal called The Merkel Plan: restoring control; retaining compassion. Its core points also serve as a background to Tatjana Festerling’s speech:
Over the next 12 months Germany officially offers asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees who are registered in Turkish camps
and will transport them to Germany. In return, Turkey will accept or take back all refugees who reach Greece via the
Aegean. Germany will compensate the Turkish concession by financial assistance and political support in the attainment
of EU visa exemption in 2016.
All across the country there is now banning of pork in kindergartens and schools. Villages, communities and entire areas of cities are on the threshold of destabilisation. Community life is collapsing. Such places as concert halls and public spaces are occupied by asylum seekers. We are on the verge of the collapse of communal finance, social welfare and health insurance. Also dramatic is the complete loss of trust in the politicians and in the media. Not for nothing does the word “Lügenpresse” [lying press] surface ever more frequently. The media operate their own political agenda. We are experiencing an opinion diktat and a bitter struggle for sovereignty over interpretation in Germany.
By contrast the asylum industry is booming. Dependency relationships are created, individual profiteers break rank, and that too disturbs the solidarity among people. In Germany we are facing a deep division in society. However, here is where the difference between East and West Germany becomes ever more clearly apparent. In the large cities parallel societies are appearing, and we are experiencing a ghettoisation in major German cities.
All in all we ascertain Germany to be in a mode of hysteria. The danger from the Right is played up, and in the process a self-hatred becomes apparent; and that is taking on enormous proportions, particularly among the youth in Germany. Even our children are currently being indoctrinated in the schools on the subject of refugees, and the denial of an increasingly self-fundamentalising Islam continues apace. At the same time we are faced with a mounting intolerance for dissenting opinions. Every attempt to conduct an honest debate is nipped in the bud. We are seeing a moral-terrorism in Germany, an exclusively moralising type of debate. Factual arguments are immediately suppressed. Unfortunately we are experiencing a complete failure of the intellectuals. That is particularly sad.
One can say that Germany is suffering from a collective Stockholm syndrome, which is leading to a full paralysis in politics; above all since there is an absence of parliamentary opposition; and on the other hand, there is the ever self-confident, demanding Islam and the emergence of the fascistic autonomists, the Antifa.
Despite fear mongering over Sharia law, there are no Muslims pushing to have any laws outside their own communities that force the rest of us to conform to anything in Islam.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
A religion that calls for, supports and actually committed in well documented instances by its members, the killing of LGBT's in grotesque and public fashion is championed by lefties? Wow.
A religion that still practices the mutilation of female genitalia to the common extremes that examples can be found in all western nations, let alone every third world sh!thole, is championed by the home of women's rights liberals? Wow.
But hey, they have something real and tangible in common, the demise of Western civilization and are actively working towards that common goal on a daily basis from the lowliest sheeplike indoctrinated believer of their philosophies, to the well-to-do elite among them with money, power and prestige.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight
Personally I think it is too late, at least for Europe. My only hope now is that the truth leads people away from their evils before violence occurs.
So then why? What is this insane apologism? If we are to be wary of right-wing fascism, theocracy, and totalitarianism, why do we let the worst offenders of all these skate by with nary a peep?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
There is no stranger relationship than the one between the Islamists and politically correct westerners, who have since become odd bedfellows.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
a reply to: Kali74
The wife of a Christian man can divorce him, even have an affair and then collect alimony.
The wife of a Muslim can never leave her husband, if she does or is caught in an affair she is killed with the full sanction of their religion.
Which woman has more freedom ?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
As the article points out, many in the rest of world do not deride the works of Western Civ for being done by old, dead white men. Many of today's finest classical music recordings are done by Japanese musicians. They don't see Mozart of Beethoven as "old dead white men" but some of the finest composers of classical music.
To remove Shakespeare from the canon because he's a white man is to ignore that he is revered not for his skin color but because he is one of the finest playwrights the world has produced.