It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: chr0naut
Which they would have been hard at work on in 2004. They would have had to be well into testing at the time the explosion happened. And it would have added time to the development. I've had several people tell me how convenient the timing was, as quite a bit of fairly high end plutonium was in the area of the blast, as were several of the people involved in developing the bomb.
originally posted by: Bornsecrets
What if you had a bucket full of anti-matter? What would you do with this?
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: Bornsecrets
a bucket of antimatter would destroy the solar system and then some the second it touched the bucket.
I may be wrong, but wouldn't an infinitesimal amount of antimatter power the planet long into our extinction in theory?
VERY little would be near infinite power, if it didn't still blow up the planet the second it touched our atmosphere.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: chr0naut
Developing the material and testing the device, starting from scratch takes years of development. If it was easy more than nation stateswould have them. They had to test all the parts, then put them together. You don't go to work in January, and detonate a device on your first try in April, even if you've already got all the materials.
They detonated their first device in 2006, and are still having issues with reliability with their current devices.