It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

If you give a Mouse a Cookie and the Liberal LGBT Agenda

page: 12
48
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

Wow. You were talking about surrogates.
Please try and keep up. You are embarrassing yourself.




posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: DanteGaland

Oh didn't you know??? Male dogs choose to hump other male dogs.


can they reproduce that way?

Yep they can.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

Accept the following challenge...
Choose to be gay for a week or two.

Come back to ATS with your results.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: GuidedKill

Accept the following challenge...
Choose to be gay for a week or two.

Come back to ATS with your results.

I already challenged him and he ignored me.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

Mother Nature didn't design men and women to have sex without getting pregnant either, and yet people do it all the time. Single couples, married couples. It's called birth control. I assume now you are going to say birth control is wrong? You certainly don't see condoms or the pill in nature.

If there's nothing wrong with birth control, then there's nothing wrong with gay sex. Either way, a baby isn't going to get made.


I didn't say there was anything 'wrong" I just said we made to mate with the opposite sex phisologically...I said due to two people from the opposite sex not being able to reproduce means that we weren't designed to be gay. Now that doesn't mean you can hump who evers leg you want....Just don't go around saying being gay is genetic and not a choice...Being heterosexual is genetic per our design...not the other way around.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

So then you have no problem with transgenders? I mean a male transgender can naturally have a child with a female transgender.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

A gay man can still reproduce with a woman
Are you stupid?
That's a serious question



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: GuidedKill

So then you have no problem with transgenders? I mean a male transgender can naturally have a child with a female transgender.

LOL. Touche. What's that sound? Oh that's the sound of GuideKill's head exploding.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

If you think you choose who you are attracted to, you're an idiot. One may choose to act on that attraction, but you don't choose the attraction. It just happens.


I never said that....I said you upbringing and social environment can and does influence who you may be attracted to. Just like how some tribes like bigger woman and all the girls strive to gain weight there. That is a social behavior and not genetic. They weren't born to like heavier woman....they were conditioned to like heavier...Just like here in America billboards push body image and what we "should" like or think is beautiful.....they don't force you to like one way or the other but merely condition you to think one way or the other..

This is learned social and tribal behavior....


Do you think homosexuality is a new behavior? And if not, couldn't the converse of what you're implying be true? Let's play it out...

Homosexuality has been part of the human condition for as long as we have been human. However, people with the orientation were persecuted and subject to laws that criminalized their behavior. For this reason, homosexuals would keep their orientation hidden. Society imposed norms that condemned (you might say "conditioned") otherwise normal human behavior. This created a situation in which people didn't see gay people living openly, which led to them thinking that the homosexual population was smaller than it actually was.
edit on 6-7-2017 by icanteven because: typo



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

Convenient wasn't it, mate.


That's why I followed your footsteps.
Maybe he'll respond this time.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GuidedKill

Wow. You were talking about surrogates.
Please try and keep up. You are embarrassing yourself.


so two men can reproduce without a female egg?? and two woman can reproduce without a male sperm??

Got it!! thanks.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GuidedKill

Are you aware that homosexual people have children?


Not with each other they don't....They get other to bare children for them.....they are called surrogates.


Haha
Saw this before I asked if you were stupid. I now see that you are.
Gay men have been marrying women and reproducing since forever.

Only with surrogates
Hahahaha



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

You are all over the place. First you say being gay is a choice, then you claim never to have said that, now you're back to being gay is a choice.

Who you are attracted to is NOT a choice.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: GuidedKill

Accept the following challenge...
Choose to be gay for a week or two.

Come back to ATS with your results.


And what would that prove? that I am not gay??? I'm the one saying humans are born to reproduce with the opposite sex...So if I go out and try and be gay for a day will that somehow change the science?



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GuidedKill

Wow. You were talking about surrogates.
Please try and keep up. You are embarrassing yourself.


so two men can reproduce without a female egg?? and two woman can reproduce without a male sperm??

Got it!! thanks.

Who claimed otherwise? You are acting like you are in first grade going around telling people you learned about eggs and sperm.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: DanteGaland

Oh didn't you know??? Male dogs choose to hump other male dogs.


can they reproduce that way?

Yep they can.


LOL - I started to type the same reply.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill

Mother Nature didn't design men and women to have sex without getting pregnant either, and yet people do it all the time. Single couples, married couples. It's called birth control. I assume now you are going to say birth control is wrong? You certainly don't see condoms or the pill in nature.

If there's nothing wrong with birth control, then there's nothing wrong with gay sex. Either way, a baby isn't going to get made.


I didn't say there was anything 'wrong" I just said we made to mate with the opposite sex phisologically...I said due to two people from the opposite sex not being able to reproduce means that we weren't designed to be gay. Now that doesn't mean you can hump who evers leg you want....Just don't go around saying being gay is genetic and not a choice...Being heterosexual is genetic per our design...not the other way around.


You don't know what you're talking about.
Now if gay men were shooting blanks then I might be inclined to lean towards something like what you are arguing for.
Gay people can have sex and reproduce. That is a fact.
A gay man and a lesbian can have a child the old fashion way via #ing


Get some



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: GuidedKill

Accept the following challenge...
Choose to be gay for a week or two.

Come back to ATS with your results.


And what would that prove? that I am not gay??? I'm the one saying humans are born to reproduce with the opposite sex...So if I go out and try and be gay for a day will that somehow change the science?

Don't avoid the question. Your claim is that being gay is a choice.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:42 PM
link   
a reply to: TinySickTears

Asexual people have babies too. I wonder what GuideKill think about asexual people.



posted on Jul, 6 2017 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: GuidedKill

A gay man can still reproduce with a woman
Are you stupid?
That's a serious question


Are you stupid or something?? I said two men cant reproduce....and two women cant reproduce....That's all I ever said..Of course you can be gay and get a woman pregnant.....

I said two men cant have sex with each and reproduce....and two woman cant have sex with eachother and reproduce...
don't put words into my mouth




top topics



 
48
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join