It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Even having 8 makes a Russia vs the US type exchange , long term almost inevitable and then we are playing for the species people. There will be no "next generation"... not likely.
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: DAVID64
Tell me David, because no one seems to answer this question when I ask them, maybe you will enlighten me...
Would you let your neighbour decide what guns you can and can't have to defend your home?
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: DAVID64
Tell me David, because no one seems to answer this question when I ask them, maybe you will enlighten me...
Would you let your neighbour decide what guns you can and can't have to defend your home?
If you constantly threaten your neighbors then periodically fire your gun in their direction. Expect a visit by the police to confiscate said fire arms when they place you under arrest. Because you have rights to defend your self you dont have rights to threaten others. North Korea is constantly threatening it's neighbors and the UN has deemed them a threat. Is it time for the police to show up??
A former senior international nuclear watchdog official has raised the possibility of North Korea having nuclear warheads small enough to fit on intercontinental ballistic missiles, a U.S. broadcaster reported Thursday.
It is possible for the North to have held considerably elaborate and miniaturized nuclear warheads with less than 500 kilograms given its technology and manpower, Olli Heinonen, former deputy director-general for safeguards at the International Atomic Energy Agency, told Radio Free Asia. He said that more than a decade has passed since the North conducted its first nuclear test in 2006.
The North has pressed ahead with its nuclear program as a major task, into which it has put talented manpower and huge resources, Heinonen pointed out, while recalling that it has produced plutonium since the 1980s, even before the nuclear test.
So many are concentrating on North Korea's accuracy without considering that an INACCURATE nuke on your soil is just as bad.
Tens of billions of dollars spent over three decades have still left the Pentagon with no reliable way to shoot down nuclear-tipped missiles approaching the U.S. homeland — a vulnerability that has taken on sharp new urgency after North Korea’s Independence Day test of its first ICBM.
Instead, the missile defense system designed to shield the United States from an intercontinental ballistic missile — a diverse network of sensors, radars and interceptor missiles based in Alaska and California — has failed three of its five tests, military leaders acknowledge.
Even the two successful ones were heavily scripted. “If the North Koreans fired everything they had at us, and we fired at all of the missiles, we’d probably get most of them,” said Jeffrey Lewis, the director of the East Asia nonproliferation program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. “But is ‘probably get most’ a good day or a bad day?”
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: DAVID64
Tell me David, because no one seems to answer this question when I ask them, maybe you will enlighten me...
Would you let your neighbour decide what guns you can and can't have to defend your home?