It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Pig Demonstrates Yet Again That He Is More Equal Than the Rest

page: 1
15
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 05:57 AM
link   
Well, it’s pretty well established that the narcissist thinks that he is so privileged that the laws, rules, regulations and standards that apply to mere mortal men simple do not apply to the narcissist.

Apparently, Trump has convinced his lawyers to go along with his narcissistic claim of privilege, a privilege which allows him to violate the U.S. Constitution with impunity. It's incredulous that Trump’s legal team went along with this. [Footnote: Trump was explicitly referred to as an “uber-narcissist" by a newsman not too long ago on T.V.]

This matter is discussed by Farron Cousins in the following Youtube video: Trump's Legal Defense: the President Is Allowed to Violate the Constitution

There was an OP-Ed piece in the Los Angeles Times about this: Trump's 'emoluments' defense argues he can violate the Constitution with impunity. That can't be right

It’s a sad day when licensed legal professionals are drawn into the “alternate reality” of an uber-narcissistic client.

It’s been said time and time again in news commentary that Donald Trump resides in his own alternate reality. Is this symptomatic of psychosis? Maybe, but I think it more likely goes back to the feeling of privilege associated with narcissism. Just as the laws, rules, regulations, and standards of the common man may not serve the narcissist’s purpose, when the common man’s reality does not serve the narcissist’s purpose, the narcissist is privileged to make up his own reality, an alternate one, and reside in that non-reality.

This just all goes to show that an uber-narcissist is not bound by The United States Constitution which happens to be the highest law of the land.

And so, the pig has demonstrated that he is more equal than the rest of us. Why, he even demonstrates that he is more equal than the 43 Presidents who came before him. Yikes!



+4 more 
posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:00 AM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

You have a good point.. using " pig" only cloudiest it and makes you look like a partisan hack.


The person with the logical point doesn't need ad hominem attacks, adding logical fallacies to your argument only hurts your argument.



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:00 AM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

I can only deduct that their motives are racist. The black president could not even go golfing without it being a constitutional crisis.


+14 more 
posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:02 AM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

Lay off the Haterade



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

You have a good point.. using " pig" only cloudiest it and makes you look like a partisan hack.


The person with the logical point doesn't need ad hominem attacks, adding logical fallacies to your argument only hurts your argument.


I am just demonstrating my literacy.

Read Animal Farm.


+15 more 
posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

I can only deduct that their motives are racist. The black president could not even go golfing without it being a constitutional crisis.



Typical. Casting the finger and screaming racist and then referring to "The black president" in the same breath.



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:05 AM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

Four legs good, two legs bad, four le....

Oh, wait, different pig.




posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:05 AM
link   
a reply to: MOMof3

Idk..

I don't think many of the big wig types are actually racist.. I think they know the math says blacks won't vote fur them and it is purely a political strategy they would be happy to use in any group where 80%+ will not vote their way.

Calling it racist imho isn't accurate and allows for oodles of counter points that distract from your main point.

If your side is right you don't need the ad hominem attacks or overgeneralizations..



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:07 AM
link   
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

Is that really relevant??

Are the people that read this gonna think "oh what a cool animal farm reference!"

No they are going to think..

" oh a partisan shill..."



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:12 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

I don't believe you and I can post my opinion comrade.


+4 more 
posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: theworldisnotenough


Well, it’s pretty well established that the narcissist thinks that he is so privileged that the laws, rules, regulations and standards that apply to mere mortal men simple do not apply to the narcissist.

Apparently, Trump has convinced his lawyers to go along with his narcissistic claim of privilege, a privilege which allows him to violate the U.S. Constitution with impunity. It's incredulous that Trump’s legal team went along with this. [Footnote: Trump was explicitly referred to as an “uber-narcissist" by a newsman not too long ago on T.V.]

...



I find it hilarious that you're pouncing all over Donald Trump for being an "uber-narcissist" and violating the Constitution right on the heels of eight years of the previous uber-narcissist and Constitution raper that we just got rid of.

Not justifying anything Trump has done wrong - if, indeed, he has - just astounded at how people are acting like this is something new.

And as to "a newsman" making any reference to Donald Trump ... Well, my dog farted last night, and I attribute about as much to that fart as I do to what newsman has to say about anything.
edit on 2017 7 05 by incoserv because: I am an uber-narcissist



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:16 AM
link   
a reply to: MOMof3

So you don't think , I think what I posted?!?!

That's a bold assertion lol..

When you allow logical fallacies in your argument, you provide fodder for people to use against your side.

The conservative side needs logical fallacies because their policies are ridiculous..

The left only hurts them selves by allowing them.



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:16 AM
link   
a reply to: MOMof3

Doubling down on proving his point, nice work.


+7 more 
posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:18 AM
link   
OP you should take JoshuaCox's advise.
He's a known leftist hack too, but he's not resorting to name calling so people at least listen to his point of view before dismissing it.

Your OP immediately came off as the bloviating of a whiney shill so I didn't bother reading past the 1st sentence. Maybe you had valid points to make, I'll never know because you sound like a highschool kid trolling while on summer break regurgitating what the TV tells you.



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:24 AM
link   
a reply to: incoserv

Only in right wing world...

In reality obama was an ubber moderate far to willing to work with republicans willing to lie cheat and steal to discredit him.

Jesus Christ their whole spiel on him was..

"Obama is a super secret Muslim Plante socialist antichrist who is purosfully trying to destroy America!! "


Which is laughable on every front..

Obama will go down in history as an average president..

Trump will go down in history as a jack @$$ who was too stupid not to lie within the same speech..


As science and technology improves conservatism will be found more and more laughable.

Future generations will think..

"You mean their was really a whole political faction who was based on the belief that "all of science, media, unions, teachers , colleges , professor and celebrities were all in a vast conspiracy to make the GOP look bad and discredit JESUS!!

Were they eating ergot?!?! "


You can't stop progress and a political party based on stteadily declining ancient religions and stopping society from progressing is doomed to fail.



"



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:25 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

I have come to my own conclusion about this last election. It was all about punishing the nation for allowing a black man to make his mark. Hence, repealing everything Obama signed. It was never about policy. Not when they had other decent candidates to choose from.



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:26 AM
link   
a reply to: watchitburn

Such a leftist hack that i police my own side and try to keep logical fallacies out of the argument..

PS you just did exactly what you told him not to... in the same post you were telling him not to do it in..

Lol..

That takes a special kind of oblivious...

Isn't someone who doesn't agree with his side when they use logical fallacies LITERALLY THE OPPOSITE OF A PARTISAN HACK?!?!


I mean literally the definition of partisan hack is one who backs his side reguardless of who is right?!?!

lol just lol..


edit on 5-7-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-7-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:35 AM
link   
a reply to: MOMof3

Oh I think it was about the democrats choosing the only person on the planet trump could beat...

You couldn't find 6 people EXCITED about Hillary..

But you could find a lot of very motivated trump fans..

So both sides are hated, but one side has people who actually want their candidate and one side has people who didn't want trump..

And Hillary still won the popular vote without a single person who really wanted her to win because she was the best for the job..

Then when you add in the DNC hack/leak a week before the election.. and all the conspiracy stuff circulating..

Hell, I kinda think the conspiracy people actually choose the president... hypothetically they are the ones who swap back and forth always siding against the establishment.

Conspiracy theories don't work when your side is running things unless they are involved.






Bernie schools trump



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: theworldisnotenough

Is that really relevant??

Are the people that read this gonna think "oh what a cool animal farm reference!"

No they are going to think..

" oh a partisan shill..."


My immediate thought was the animal farm reference. Perhaps ATS' membership has some reading to do.



posted on Jul, 5 2017 @ 06:51 AM
link   
I dont see a violation of the emoluments clause in the first place. You want to contend that he is being influenced by foreign governmrnts because the Kuwait embassy rebooked their hotel accomodations from the Four Seasons to Trumps DC hotel? This lawsuit is so detached from the emoluments clause the AG should be barred. Let us know when Trump personally receives a half billion dollars in exchange for foreign influence. Next....




top topics



 
15
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join