It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LONDON — Charlie Gard, who turns 11 months old Tuesday, was born with an extremely rare genetic disease. He is blind and deaf, and he cannot breathe or move on his own. He suffers from persistent epileptic seizures.
Now the British infant is at the center of a global debate, drawing in the Vatican and President Donald Trump, over what medical treatment, if any, he is entitled to receive, and who decides — his family, his doctors or the courts.
“These terrible decisions have to be made all the time,” said Jonathan Moreno, a professor of ethics at the University of Pennsylvania. “It is very unusual for a case like this to explode on the global stage. They raise difficult moral and ethical questions.”
The London hospital that is treating Charlie has asked permission to remove him from life support. His parents want to take him to the United States, where they believe an experimental treatment has a chance — however remote — of prolonging his life, even though the disease has no cure.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
LONDON — Charlie Gard, who turns 11 months old Tuesday, was born with an extremely rare genetic disease. He is blind and deaf, and he cannot breathe or move on his own. He suffers from persistent epileptic seizures.
Now the British infant is at the center of a global debate, drawing in the Vatican and President Donald Trump, over what medical treatment, if any, he is entitled to receive, and who decides — his family, his doctors or the courts.
“These terrible decisions have to be made all the time,” said Jonathan Moreno, a professor of ethics at the University of Pennsylvania. “It is very unusual for a case like this to explode on the global stage. They raise difficult moral and ethical questions.”
The London hospital that is treating Charlie has asked permission to remove him from life support. His parents want to take him to the United States, where they believe an experimental treatment has a chance — however remote — of prolonging his life, even though the disease has no cure.
www.seattletimes.com...
A difficult topic. A sad topic for anyone who is a parent. I'll give my opinion right off the bat; If the parents want to move mountains to care for their child, then they should be able to do so. The government should be bending over backwards to follow the parents wishes.
But who knows more? The parents or the government?
It sickens me to think that a cold government can so casually dismiss a parents desires to do anything and everything for their child.
originally posted by: scojak
Considering how often medical opinions are wrong, I say # that.
If the parents want to, and can pay for it, that is their right.
I don't see how a medical facility can say, "sorry, we can't make your son better so we've decided to off him."
Sickening.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: DBCowboy
As a parent I can't imagine facing this, it makes my cancer pale in comparison. Yet I know at some point I will most likely say that I've suffered enough and it's time to let me go. This poor infant can't do that. He can't live off of life support so how does he get to the US?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AkontaDarkpaw
Let's try to keep in mind that the courts are not making this decision. They act on the advice and knowledge of the medical staff attending this little one.
They don't just decide.
It's horrible.
No parent should ever have to suffer the loss of a child.
originally posted by: Kali74
Yet I know at some point I will most likely say that I've suffered enough and it's time to let me go.