It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Sublimecraft
'Trump and Russia collude to interfere in US elections'.
No MSM outlet has claimed such. There are several investigations underway on collusion. They are newsworthy.
originally posted by: Tulpa
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Didn't someone, not so long ago, make it legal for propaganda to be used against the American people?
Seems like his plan is really bearing fruit.
Much of it low hanging.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: ParasuvO
I disagree. If it's been claimed thousands of times, why does it seem an impossibility for someone to quote just one?
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: ParasuvO
I disagree. If it's been claimed thousands of times, why does it seem an impossibility for someone to quote just one?
Here read this headline for ONE
CNN
www.cnn.com...
My google "Trump colludes with Russian" literally got hundreds of MSM stories.
Here is another lie about DJT with a shot from Col-burt spelled (colbert).
www.newsweek.com...
By now, everyone knows that a headline determines how many people will read a piece, particularly in this era of social media. But, more interesting, a headline changes the way people read an article and the way they remember it.
...
a headline can influence your mindset as you read so that you later recall details that coincide with what you were expecting.
...
Inferences, however, remained sound: the misdirection was blatant enough that readers were aware of it and proceeded to correct their impressions accordingly.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: redtic
Considering the 80/20 rule of headline writing, it's enough that the headline alleges it. Most people don't read past that. So if the headline says "Trump Colludes With Russia," most people aren't going to read anything else.
What message does that send?
1) Russia attempted to interfere with our election
2) Russia at the very least wanted Hillary to lose, if not wanting Trump to win
3) The possibility of collusion with Trump or members of his campaign/administration is very real
1) Russia attempted to interfere with our election
2) Russia at the very least wanted Hillary to lose, if not wanting Trump to win
3) The possibility of collusion with Trump or members of his campaign/administration is very real
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: ketsuko
The point is, no such headline exists in the MSM.