It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sadly, most people don't know that the first slave ship docked in Jamestown, Va., in August 1619, a year before the pilgrims dropped anchor at Plymouth Rock.
ST. AUGUSTINE - 1565 In 1565, Pedro Menendez de Aviles(photo) established San Agustine (St. Augustine), the first permanent European (Spanish) settlement in Florida under the terms of King Philip’s Asiento (agreement to colonize Florida), Menendez had three years to import 500 Africans slaves to Florida, and evidence suggests that African slaves from Havana, Cuba, were among St. Augustine’s first settlers
Yes, it's come time that History, (actually just the kind that looks a bit ugly) needs to be erased.
Did Robert E. Lee own slaves? Yes...
Over here we see it in acton too, disappearing the past so future generations won't ask, "Who was Stonewall Jackson"?
Slaves first arrived in North America when The Spanish bought them over in 1565.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: introvert
Add in a few doses of propaganda and you can change what people believe about history. We have plenty of examples of that already in this thread.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: introvert
By itself it is a minor thing... but when you look at the overall steady assault on the history surrounding the Civil war, it is comparable.
Everything I listed has happened or is happening right now in various places in the United States, people are trying to erase or hide history to spare feelings... it is wrong.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: rnaa
I see you know as much about American history as you do about electricity.
I like consistency.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: introvert
Add in a few doses of propaganda and you can change what people believe about history. We have plenty of examples of that already in this thread.
TheRedneck
I agree. Don't misunderstand me on this. I denounce any attempts to change history or attempts to keep true history from people, but in this case that is not what is happening here.
The names of major streets are changed quite often. In my local area, they changed the name of a street that was named after President Harding and renamed it after MLK Jr.
Does that change affect history in any manner? I don't believe it does. It's purely symbolic and not something to get our panties twisted over.
Sorry, I missed your evidence-oriented rebuttal, Mr. Engineer.
noun
1. an act of rebutting, as in a debate.
noun
1. an act or instance of dismissing.
2. the state of being dismissed.
3. a spoken or written order of discharge from employment, service, enrollment, etc.
Yes, it's come time that History, (actually just the kind that looks a bit ugly) needs to be erased. This is a bit beyond banning a flag, this is the systematic removal of anything remotely related to the civil war. And who knows, in 15 years, perhaps those who speak of the civil war will be laughed at and ridiculed for believing in such a wild crazy lie.
It wasn't a rebuttal; it was a dismissal.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: rnaa
Both Lee and Jackson are traitors to the United States.
hey lets play a game... you show me a list of the confederate leaders convicted of treason...
Treason occurred as a topic in public discourse—pamphlets, newspapers, public gatherings, and the like—as often as commentary on the progress of the war and the concern for soldiers,...
Popular notions of treason, as opposed to court decisions, drove policymaking and caused members of the public sometimes to take matters into their own hands, such as storming a newspaper office or punishing an outspoken minister.
Northerners took a pragmatic approach to the war’s end. They realized the impracticality of trying thousands of Southerners for disloyalty in states where juries were unlikely to deliver guilty verdicts, and that continued cries of treason would interfere with the more important task of nation-building.
Ironically, the lenient approach allowed Robert E. Lee and other Confederate leaders to become heroic figures to later generations of Americans of all sections, says Blair, citing words written by Union Gen. George Thomas in 1868: “The crime of treason might be covered with a counterfeit varnish of patriotism, so that the precipitators of the rebellion might go down in history hand-in-hand with the defenders of the (US) Government.”