Associated Press Corrects Big Falsehood In Four Trump-Russia Reports

a reply to: Xcathdra

So tell me what you think the significance of this is ?
Do you honestly think the investigation is going to come to an end because of this?
If it's even true. You guys pick and choose what stories to believe and what stories are fake so who knows if this one is even real.
But that aside. Let's assume this is a correction.
What do you think it means?
That there's any doubt Russia did this?
Because there is no doubt.
Only idiots think otherwise.
You're not an idiot so....

a reply to: Xcathdra

no, i dont spin stories on ats, i realize the news it what it is...could be false, could be mistaken, could be true.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Good point. Who was the first one to publicly spread this lie? In my memory, I think it was Hillary Clinton during a debate. But I am open to correction with evidence. I will research this a bit.

I wanna say it was Clinton and I believe she stated it during one of the debates.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Xcathdra

lol, he may or may not, people retract things all the time, that is what happens why you try and report news as it happens.

That does not mean Russia was not involved, it doesnt change much at all actually.

But of course you are going to go and run with "NA na an ana nboob boo...trump was awesome and telling the truth this WHOLE time and you were wrong...ca ca poo pooo, ha ha"

Why do you not hold this same standard with trump?

He has to be held to exactly what his words were.

I don't remember you mocking anti trump people when they screamed how horrible trump was for saying Obama wiretapped him instead of unmasked.

The double standard is amazing.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Please cite your sources to support your claim all intel agencies supported the conclusion to one degree or another.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Xcathdra

no, i dont spin stories on ats, i realize the news it what it is...could be false, could be mistaken, could be true.

since i linked you to the AP article discussing the retractions it would be true.

a reply to: Grambler

lofl, ok.

I am NOT going to EVER...EVER support one of trumps twitter ramblings...EVER

a reply to: Xcathdra

Are you?

When did you ask?

And why do you need that?

And what's the difference they still hacked us.
You're not saying Russia didn't hack us are you?

Why are you guys wasting your precious time on discussing with an obvious shill?

Almost 16,000 posts in just a year; registered during the elections.

a reply to: Xcathdra

or...could be fake news, like your dictator always says

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Good point. Who was the first one to publicly spread this lie? In my memory, I think it was Hillary Clinton during a debate. But I am open to correction with evidence. I will research this a bit.

Well...she had to either be told the same by someone, misunderstood what she read, or just made it up.

Wonder if Hillary will make a public retraction....LOL

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

So what? Why is this important?
Does it change the fact that Russia hacked the election?
NO, IT DOESN'T.

How can it change something that never happened?

White House insists hackers didn't sway election, even as recount begins

www.politico.com...

a reply to: Sillyolme

You claimed all 16 intel agencies supported the conclusion to one degree or another. We know it was only 3 and it was only moderately confident.

Cite your sources to support your claim.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Grambler

lofl, ok.

I am NOT going to EVER...EVER support one of trumps twitter ramblings...EVER

Thank you for being honest about being partisan.

So we now know, you are so subjective that your opinion is worth very little.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Xcathdra

or...could be fake news, like your dictator always says

So the AP is putting out fake news about their own retractions....

wow.. ok

a reply to: Grambler

sure, however you want to view it, its still a free country

we have 17 intelligence agencies???? why so many??
you'd think we'd be so intelligent with all of those we'd all be geniuses!!

but looking though the list here...

en.wikipedia.org...

many of them, like the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, probably wouldn't have much to say one way or another..
it just isn't their field of expertise.

I'm surprised that there isn't one concerning cyber security,

so, they made a mistake, it happens from time to time....
doesn't change the fact that those intelligence agencies that had the responsibility of investigating this didn't all come back agreeing with the results!!! Russia pulled off a very effective campaign in order to meddle in our election and sway the results to the candidate they preferred. and those that are screaming fake news, fake news, including the president, fell for some of the most unbelievable bullcrap put out by russian agents!

a reply to: Xcathdra

no, what you are saying is if it fits your agenda...its real news, but if it doesnt, its fake news, you are a mini-trump

a reply to: Xcathdra

She might be responsible for the whole Birth Certificate flap during the 2008 campaign as well.

But as for the other reply, Would you say they self-identify as a totalitarian democracy rather than a republic of representative voting then? Plenty of countries for them to move to if they like that sort of thing like Russia. People could vote for other than Putin but it was pretty much a wasted vote. As it may not have even been tallied.

From the article...

None of the other agencies overseen by the DNI publicly disagreed with the finding Russia tried to interfere,