You're LOSING !!

originally posted by: wantsome
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I've been lurking in this thread the past couple of days. You're one hell of a troll man.

8 Yeahs of Obama must have really drove you nuts. Tell me what didn't you like about him much?

He's been out of office for a while and you still seem salty.

Hes been out of office for 3 months.

Its been over 8 years and the dedicated left are still bashing Bush...lol

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

Your response is a perfect example of twisted left views.

There was no winning during the obama years...lmao

For eight years all we heard was, "You lost - get over it."

How did I insult the left?

I am mocking the left for acting like a bunch of whiny babies for losing the election.

That is the traditional last gasp of every single liberal argument: attack their sense of self worth and call them weak - it makes you look stronger. NOT.

Well hypocrites? When are YOU going to get over it and start acting like part of a nation instead of a bunch of separatist cry babies?

And of course lets not ignore the personal attack at the end.

Typical. Just sad, pathetic, and typical.

There... I just destroyed your post with your own quotes. Now for the insult you so desire... I am a colossal idiot.

The winning during the obama years refers to his policies and the affect they had on this nation, not whether he won the election - idiot.


You accused me of mocking the left for losing the election. Nice try. I mocked the left for acting like a bunch of pussies for losing the election - idiot.


And yes, I responded to you in your own language - idiot.


People like you really are pathetic. You twist words, spew hate, deny the obvious, and act like you are the victim. I really do feel sorry for you.

Idiot.

And now this guy is ignorant to the fact that obama pulled the US out of the Bush instigated recession. I bet hes ALSO afraid to read the truth about his hero here because his hero said its "fake news'-Whenever the media calls out trumps numerous lies Trump bamboozles his supporters that its fake news. I dare you to read this:www.documentcloud.org...

a reply to: Rconrad

The great recession ended in March of 09. What happened that pulled us out if it and how did Obama have an effect on it?

LOL and you link to the discredited dossier! And you call others uninformed?

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Rconrad

The great recession ended in March of 09. What happened that pulled us out if it and how did Obama have an effect on it?

LOL and you link to the discredited dossier! And you call others uninformed?

Google the "recovery act" einstein for proof obama took us out of the ditch bush drove us into. Trump discredited it for you-which is why you think its discredited even though its real intelligence from a noted british spy commisioned by the republicans themselves which you yourself would know if you researched it vs. listening to your hero. Lol.

a reply to: Rconrad

Lol, nope. The ARRA did nothing to help, none of the money was even out in the econnomy when it bottomed. But you know what did help? QE. The fed ended the recession. I wrote a very long paper for my advanced economics class about it, the direct effects were easy to spot and coincide perfectly with the end of the recession. We just got $1T of debt from the ARRA, for nothing more than a tiny (near undetectable) increase in the recovery speed.

As for the Dossier, it wasn't written by nor commissioned by republicans. It was commissioned by dems and written by the democrat leaning (dare I say stumbling and falling) Fusion GPS. Further, there has only been one proof positive ever found in the fake dossier, and that's that the russian ambassador was a spy, shocking right!?!?!. But more entertainingly, the spy, kalugin, left the US and didn't return after august of 2016.

You really should stop visiting crazy left wing websites for your information. They're giving you awful information.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
Left, liberals...you're losing!

You're losing "traction" with the American people.

You're losing "credibility"

You're losing "respect"

...and frankly, you're losing "identity", 'unity' even, as a party.

Bottom line; you're losing!

The lies have become too apparent. The over the top political zeal has become tiresome. Your trusted MSM networks have failed you...they lied.

Desperation and violence is all that remains for you. Burn it down, protest, murder people, act out...disrupt, stomp your feet, snivel and cry. You've LOST.

Sorry, but it's true. Your immaturity screams, your uninformed lock-step adherence to your socialist ideology bleeds from every pore of your being.

If it weren't for the violence, torchings, cities burning, lawlessness, gangsta and general thuggish-ness, it might even be comical, or sad even. But at the end of the day you have no sympathy. Your voice is but a lost whimper in the wind now, growing more distant by the day. Why is it you cannot see this?

You've lost.

And, honestly...it feels good! Why? Because YOU made it feel good!!

Obsessed much? Yikes...

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: fencesitter85

Ooops, you had me...right up until the "KKK" part. OOPS!!!

The KKK, in case you hadn't cared to research it, is a product of the left...NOT the right. They exist in overwhelmingly democratic states, and the original republican party was created in part to combat such mentality.

Thank you for once again proving my point! The left is replete with hypocrisy!! It just never ends!

Silly Rabbit...tricks are for kids!!

ETA...I would be remiss by not pointing out; this type of vitriolic response (such as yours) is the exact reason I've posted. This typical knee-jerk defensive response, without thinking, is precisely why the left is losing as badly as they are! Thank you! You've demonstrated this exquisitely all by yourself!!

Vitriolic? Not at all. Your logic is flawed. Who do the CURRENT KKK support? I'm not debating decades ago, I'm talking now.

Face it, you made this thread because you like to argue with people. Bottom line is, a man who makes threads like "UR LOSING LOL" clearly has very little else in his life beyond a desperate need to try and annoy people on the internet. Sad!

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: veracity

I think his attacks have nothing to do with thin skin. The thin skin of DJT is nothing but a figment of your imagination.

And this is the logic I was talking about

When someone insults him on tv, he goes to Twitter and insults them. It's exactly what children do, because they haven't yet developed the ability to rise above it and ignore comments they disagree with.

A grown man, and indeed potus, who can't get over some daytime tv show questioning his sanity, is not a strong leader. Period.

Crying and name calling on Twitter every other day is absolutely a sign of serious weakness. If Obama had done it, you guys would have called him snowflake every single day. But he was too busy being a mature adult and running the country.

Again, the logic of "Hitting back on Twitter makes him strong" is deeply flawed, because a strong person just ignores comments they deem inaccurate. A weak person gets desperately defensive and insults people.

He's one of the most hypersensitive people I've ever witnessed, and it'll be his undoing.

a reply to: fencesitter85

"When someone insults him on tv, he goes to Twitter and insults them."
That's verifiably false. He would literally spend all day on twitter if this were the case.

"It's exactly what children do, because they haven't yet developed the ability to rise above it and ignore comments they disagree with."
Now you're off in lala land since your initial assertion was false.

"A grown man, and indeed potus, who can't get over some daytime tv show questioning his sanity, is not a strong leader. Period."
This questioning of his sanity isn't isolated to morning joe, yet they''re the only ones he's tweeting about. So again, you're in lala land thinking that it's all about what they were saying.

"Crying and name calling on Twitter every other day is absolutely a sign of serious weakness."
I've yet to see trump cry (it would be everywhere if it happened). I went back through the last week worth of tweets, morning joe/mika are the only name calling. Yet more fantasy from you.

"Again, the logic of "Hitting back on Twitter makes him strong" is deeply flawed, because a strong person just ignores comments they deem inaccurate."
Again, this is provably false. The very existence of slander laws destroys this argument.

"A weak person gets desperately defensive and insults people"
Your ability to define what makes someone strong or weak is seriously lacking. There are so many other characteristics that make a person strong/weak, but you insist on boiling it down to this single trait. It's hilarious and so transparent that it only reflects poorly on your critical analysis.

"He's one of the most hypersensitive people I've ever witnessed, and it'll be his undoing."
If he were hypersensitive, he'd be having a real mental breakdown with the 24/7 attacks. In fact, he would have had it long before the election happened. Sure, he's not going to let you mock him day in and day out without a peep. But that's not hypersensitivity. In fact, it kind of sounds like the people mocking him day in and day out are just a bunch of... dare I say bullies.. Gasp!

Most of what you attribute to trump is nothing but a fantasy that the media has painted for you, which you've bought into with the whole farm. There's not much logic to your thinking nor much depth in your analysis. It's a surface skim of events and their meanings made to appease certain barriers in your mind to protect your world view.

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

You accused me of mocking the left for losing the election. Nice try. I mocked the left for acting like a bunch of pussies for losing the election - idiot.


And yes, I responded to you in your own language - idiot.


People like you really are pathetic. You twist words, spew hate, deny the obvious, and act like you are the victim. I really do feel sorry for you.

Idiot.

Easy snowflake, no need to get angry

I love how you are happy to respond "in your own language" and insult the "leftist" yet you were getting emotional about people doing it to Trump.

I think what upsets you the most is just how many people are making fun of you and how much material there is. Don't blame us, blame Trump. You aligned yourself with the laughing stock of the world, a conman who preyed on your fear, insecurities and lack of common sense and now he is leaving you in the deep end.

Instead of draining the swamp Trump has dragged you all into it, that's why all his supporters on here are soooo desperate to convince people otherwise. They know they f'd up.

a reply to: Dfairlite

Yep, great response to yet another example of just pure emotion driving statements!

a reply to: fencesitter85

Now that is an amusing response! Dare I say almost comical (it gave me a chuckle anyway).

Go after the person, not the ball...pretty predictable at this point, don't you think?

Speaking of desperation, it would seem there are quite a few who 'desperately' need something to fill that void of feeling like they need to lash out at something, anything, because they cannot justify their ideology any other way. An attempt at gaining personal satisfaction by exacting some perceived pain on those who dare point out the nearly limitless contradictions and hypocrisy of their arguments.

It's okay though, contrary to what you might want to believe, what you makes you all smug and gives you that tingly feeling inside, you'd be wrong...again!



ETA...off to feed the cows! No, really, the cows need to eat.

a reply to: argentus

This is actually an excellent observation, and I agree.

I also very much like how you crafted it in the politically agnostic way you did.

It's a shame people can't see the proverbial forest, but for the trees. The bent on demonizing the individual is so much easier than taking on the task of actually having to do something constructive, aside from armchair quarterbacking at 3/4 recline in that comfy chair, remote in hand (or keyboard, as it were). They fail to realize that by so doing not only to they not achieve their goal, but the diminish the office itself by their very deeds.

Sadly though, it's just a few lone voices in a storm of pure emotional hatred of a perceived evil which they've been constantly convinced by this same media. And they need look no further than the 24x7 stream of propaganda coming from the MSM to validate their beliefs and hatred.

a reply to: SudoNim

I'm quite confident you actually believe the words you've used to respond with. I do have a question for you though...

Where exactly is this "deep end" that people have been left in which you refer to? Is this some perceived place of hardship? If so, I'd like to know the real-world context of what you allege. Or, is this just more rhetoric and emotional hubris from the left, fed to you by a rabid MSM? Where is this hardship exactly? Unemployment is at an all time low, the stock market is up, oil prices are down and businesses are booming. So where is this hardship of which you speak?

Or...did you lockstep allegiance with the left's propaganda just cause you to step in "it"...again? Hmmmmmm?

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: poncho1982
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

It's funny.

Somehow, now saying someone is losing is immature.

Calling them "LOSERS!!!" While chanting "Na na nana na!!" Sure, maybe a little immature, but just pointing out that they are indeed losing?

Gloating maybe, but immature? No.

If it weren't true, it could be called lying, but it's true.

gloating, preening, taunting, jeering, mocking, belittling, degrading, condescending, patronizing, there are a lot of words for it. a good example of the difference between being right and being civil.

Obviously, after the 2016 elections, civility in political discourse is dead.

The complete and total meltdown of the left because they didn't get their way is proof of that.

When Obama won, the right started to fall apart, then they got their act together, got their message together, and now you see them winning, while the Democrats are losing.

The Obama legacy :

1000 seats lost in state legislatures since 2010
63 House seats lost
10 Senate seats lost
12 governorships lost
16 States out of 50 have Democrat Governors


commons.wikimedia.org...:United_States_Governors_map.svg#/media/File:United_States_Governors_map.svg

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

originally posted by: wantsome
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I've been lurking in this thread the past couple of days. You're one hell of a troll man.

8 Yeahs of Obama must have really drove you nuts. Tell me what didn't you like about him much?

He's been out of office for a while and you still seem salty.

Its been over 8 years and the dedicated left are still bashing Bush...lol

That's what LOSERS do, Vroomfondel. Especially butt-hurt losers, LOL.

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Rconrad

Lol, nope. The ARRA did nothing to help, none of the money was even out in the econnomy when it bottomed. But you know what did help? QE. The fed ended the recession. I wrote a very long paper for my advanced economics class about it, the direct effects were easy to spot and coincide perfectly with the end of the recession. We just got $1T of debt from the ARRA, for nothing more than a tiny (near undetectable) increase in the recovery speed.

As for the Dossier, it wasn't written by nor commissioned by republicans. It was commissioned by dems and written by the democrat leaning (dare I say stumbling and falling) Fusion GPS. Further, there has only been one proof positive ever found in the fake dossier, and that's that the russian ambassador was a spy, shocking right!?!?!. But more entertainingly, the spy, kalugin, left the US and didn't return after august of 2016.

You really should stop visiting crazy left wing websites for your information. They're giving you awful information.

Again you spread deceit just like your hero taught you. Agent Steele was commisioned by the republicans FIRST because they themselves didnt want Trump as their nominee. In the end Steele continued his work for FREE on his own because the intelligence he gathered pointed towards Putin grooming then blackmailing Trump. Why else do you think Trump has only praise for Putin? Also-why would John Mcain himself think it so important so as to give the FBI? Each of your posts is littered with deceit but you cant change the facts that are true regardless how desperate you try. Trumps own party were the ones who initially commisioned Steele-just because you cant face the truth doesnt make it untrue. I post the truth you come back with deceit. Not much of an exchange. You have no intention of reading Steeles intelligence because your hero called it "fake news"-Anything that points to Trumps corruption is suddenly fake news. I understand Trumps desperation but his supporters are pitiful for believing in a constant liar whos only concern is himself. Have a good life and remember this thread because history will bore Trumps complete corruptuon along with how he conned almost half the nation. You included. Oh yea-by all means DONT read this because you seem to have a problem with truth: www.documentcloud.org...

a reply to: Rconrad

You DO have another song on that 'record', don't you??? Because all I hear is the same song playing over, and over and over again.

Also, one other tiny pointer; you should really stop leaving out the "I hope", and "I wish" parts at the beginning and ends of each sentence. It would really add a lot of context for your reader. That is, unless of course you're Nostradamus or something, and I'm pretty sure he's dead.

Face it, the report is bunk. It's been proven by numerous sources to be bunk. It's written by a bunch of amateur bunko artists. Not even the most liberal news outlet in the Universe, the NYT, would even publish it; it's BUNK! AND...now read this next part very, very, carefully...

EVEN IF IT WASN'T BUNK...IT DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING!!! There's no smoking gun, there's not even smoke and a toy gun! There's just nothing but a bunch of doctored up spooky sounding innuendo. There's NO, NONE, NADA, ZERO substance!! Do you need me to repeat this (...again)??? Sheesh!!

The closest MI6 ever got to that report may have been to use it to dry their hands with (or some other nether regions).

Really, let it go! This isn't 4Chan!

originally posted by: Vroomfondel

originally posted by: wantsome
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I've been lurking in this thread the past couple of days. You're one hell of a troll man.

8 Yeahs of Obama must have really drove you nuts. Tell me what didn't you like about him much?

He's been out of office for a while and you still seem salty.

Hes been out of office for 3 months.

Its been over 8 years and the dedicated left are still bashing Bush...lol

Trump is barely in the office and the dedicated right are already bashing Obama.
LMAO.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

No, I think you've missed the point...they never stopped (bashing Obama)! It's not like they just started.

Obama is the absolute pinnacle of examples illustrating exactly why the left is losing traction, respect and identity!!! He fractured society across every single racial, every religious, every ideological and every financial boundary even imaginable!! Why? Because they elected him, that's why! He failed at foreign policy, he failed at domestic policy, he set race relations back an entire century in the US...and people still elected the guy...TWICE!! Gawd, it's just incomprehensible to me some people can't see this!! (face palm) But hey, at least he took a bunch of strokes off his golf game. There's that. Jeezus!!

How can people expect credibility when they cling so dearly to that legacy??? I mean, the American people pretty much universally acknowledged it was time for Jimmy Carter to go (right and left). And now Obama makes Carter look like Reagan in comparison for cripes sakes!!