It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump goes bonkers. Tweets about Psycho Joe and Crazy Mika.

page: 37
43
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Yeah, old males get easily grumpy especially when they don't got their mid day nap. What a freakshow

edit on 29-6-2017 by ErrorErrorError because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: toolgal462

This is a good summation but I'm afraid they'll never get it. I get it. An American who didn't vote this time because I voted for the aged socialist. LOL

But I get why Trump won 100%



Bernie was the left's push against the establishment too, would have won, would have beaten Trump... The only problem with The Burn was the establishment pushed back against him and he folded for what he thought was the best for the party.


edit on 29-6-2017 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

Exactly the evidence of trump losing should be obvious. I mean Scott brown won the Massachusetts special election without nearly such an advantage. He won that seat as a referendum on Obama. Deep blue Massachusetts turned red against Obama but the dems can't buy a win with 10x the money. Trump isn't losing.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74

The same reason I do, I guess. It is scary how unhinged he is but I can't help but laugh at the absurdity. Dark humor.


Yep, as crazy as a fox.....



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

Right again. The Bernie supporters warned the idiots pushing crooked Hillary down our throats. We told them we were never, under any circumstances going to vote for her and if Trump won, they have only themselves to blame for it.

But again, they don't listen



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Xtrozero

Exactly the evidence of trump losing should be obvious. I mean Scott brown won the Massachusetts special election without nearly such an advantage. He won that seat as a referendum on Obama. Deep blue Massachusetts turned red against Obama but the dems can't buy a win with 10x the money. Trump isn't losing.


Yah, and then he lost against the fake lying Indian. I couldn't believe it, but this is MA....



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:52 PM
link   
37 pages.

People are that upset over some tweets.

Good thing it wasn't a blog, or something.




posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Dfairlite

Anyone who saw them as a referendum on President Trump was nonsensical. The media at large wasn't supporting that, the Democrats themselves were the ones forwarding that argument. The media was simply reporting what was being said.


So I fail to see your segue with respect to what I was talking about originally.



Nonsense - the media were salivating at the prospect of GA06 being won by Democrats - they covered the election like the general. It was pushed as a referendum on Trump and the Republicans won by even more than Trump did vs Hillary. It's true the media have downplayed it since, but that was because their candidate lost again.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:02 PM
link   
It's just clicked as to why Trump tweets stupid like this.

He doesn't drink or do drugs.

He needs to start drinking and smoking weed - even his detractors admit he can't get any more stupid so I think it's worth a shot. The secret service should hold him down and give him a Bourbon-waterboarding quickly followed a dutchie.

Then unleash him on twitter periscope livestream - LOL - how awesome would that be.

Seriously, you haven't lived a proper life unless you've done pass-out drunk and weeded yourself onto 10 pizzas.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Dfairlite

Anyone who saw them as a referendum on President Trump was nonsensical. The media at large wasn't supporting that, the Democrats themselves were the ones forwarding that argument. The media was simply reporting what was being said.


So I fail to see your segue with respect to what I was talking about originally.



Nonsense - the media were salivating at the prospect of GA06 being won by Democrats - they covered the election like the general. It was pushed as a referendum on Trump and the Republicans won by even more than Trump did vs Hillary. It's true the media have downplayed it since, but that was because their candidate lost again.


Aww, quit pushing that BS.

In the general election the R candidate in GA06 won by somewhere around 20 percentage points over the D candidate.

In the Special Election, the gap between the R and D candidate was narrowed to around only 2 percentage points.

That is not a bigger gain or win, unless you use fuzzy math or just plain lie.


edit on 29-6-2017 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

In the Special Election, the gap between the R and D candidate was narrowed to around only 2 percentage points.

That is not a bigger gain or win, unless you use fuzzy math or just plain lie.



People just do not vote much in a special election...well unless they have something to prove. One would think the Democrats should have won by 20% with such a low republican turnout due to it being an off cycle election and all they had to prove.

In the end 5-0 is still 5-0



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Dfairlite

Anyone who saw them as a referendum on President Trump was nonsensical. The media at large wasn't supporting that, the Democrats themselves were the ones forwarding that argument. The media was simply reporting what was being said.


So I fail to see your segue with respect to what I was talking about originally.



Nonsense - the media were salivating at the prospect of GA06 being won by Democrats - they covered the election like the general. It was pushed as a referendum on Trump and the Republicans won by even more than Trump did vs Hillary. It's true the media have downplayed it since, but that was because their candidate lost again.


Aww, quite pushing that BS.

In the general election the R candidate in GA06 won by somewhere around 20 percentage points over the D candidate.

In the Special Election, the gap between the R and D candidate was narrowed to around only 2 percentage points.

That is not a bigger gain or win, unless you use fuzzy math or just plain lie.



Trump beat Clinton by 1.5% in the general election.
Dems put $20m+ into trying to win - they and the media made it a referendum on Trump. They lost. Trump won the game they set out to play.

Even with all that money and 60% turnout by Republicans vs the General, Trump still won (oh and the Dems had 100% turn out of the general).

Democrats made a huge deal of GA06 and then only downplayed it once they lost.
edit on 29/6/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero


People just do not vote much in a special election.


They did in this one.


One would think the Democrats should have won by 20% with such a low republican turnout due to it being an off cycle election and all they had to prove.


Part of the district is very heavily (middle and upper middle class) republican; they're not going to let a democrat win. The other half is largely democrat, which is why they closed the gap so much.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Dems have a habit of lighting large piles of cash on fire, wouldn't you agree?



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Xtrozero


People just do not vote much in a special election.


They did in this one.


One would think the Democrats should have won by 20% with such a low republican turnout due to it being an off cycle election and all they had to prove.


Part of the district is very heavily (middle and upper middle class) republican; they're not going to let a democrat win. The other half is largely democrat, which is why they closed the gap so much.


No, they didn't.
The Republicans acted as they normally do in terms of turnout outside a general election - way down. The democrats threw everything at it and managed to equal their general election turnout - and still lost.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:16 PM
link   

Reminder!
This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!


All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
We expect civility and decorum within all topics.

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: UKTruth

Dems have a habit of lighting large piles of cash on fire, wouldn't you agree?


They do indeed. Hillary outspent Trump 2-1 too... and got smashed in the General Election. It continued a trend of Democrats losing in election after election despite wasting huge sums of money.
edit on 29/6/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Dfairlite

Anyone who saw them as a referendum on President Trump was nonsensical. The media at large wasn't supporting that, the Democrats themselves were the ones forwarding that argument. The media was simply reporting what was being said.


So I fail to see your segue with respect to what I was talking about originally.



Nonsense - the media were salivating at the prospect of GA06 being won by Democrats - they covered the election like the general. It was pushed as a referendum on Trump and the Republicans won by even more than Trump did vs Hillary. It's true the media have downplayed it since, but that was because their candidate lost again.


Aww, quite pushing that BS.

In the general election the R candidate in GA06 won by somewhere around 20 percentage points over the D candidate.

In the Special Election, the gap between the R and D candidate was narrowed to around only 2 percentage points.

That is not a bigger gain or win, unless you use fuzzy math or just plain lie.



Trump beat Clinton by 1.5% in the general election.
Dems put $20m+ into trying to win - they and the media made it a referendum on Trump. They lost. Trump won the game they set out to play.

Even with all that money and 60% turnout by Republicans vs the General, Trump still won (oh and the Dems had 100% turn out of the general).

Democrats made a huge deal of GA06 and then only downplayed it once they lost.


You're still ignoring the obvious because it doesn't fit with your narrative.

I'm not talking about presidential candidate, I'm talking about congressional race. The congressional race gap was closed from roughly 20 points to around two from General to special.

Fact.

Keep up.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: Dfairlite

Anyone who saw them as a referendum on President Trump was nonsensical. The media at large wasn't supporting that, the Democrats themselves were the ones forwarding that argument. The media was simply reporting what was being said.


So I fail to see your segue with respect to what I was talking about originally.



Nonsense - the media were salivating at the prospect of GA06 being won by Democrats - they covered the election like the general. It was pushed as a referendum on Trump and the Republicans won by even more than Trump did vs Hillary. It's true the media have downplayed it since, but that was because their candidate lost again.


Aww, quite pushing that BS.

In the general election the R candidate in GA06 won by somewhere around 20 percentage points over the D candidate.

In the Special Election, the gap between the R and D candidate was narrowed to around only 2 percentage points.

That is not a bigger gain or win, unless you use fuzzy math or just plain lie.



Trump beat Clinton by 1.5% in the general election.
Dems put $20m+ into trying to win - they and the media made it a referendum on Trump. They lost. Trump won the game they set out to play.

Even with all that money and 60% turnout by Republicans vs the General, Trump still won (oh and the Dems had 100% turn out of the general).

Democrats made a huge deal of GA06 and then only downplayed it once they lost.


You're still ignoring the obvious because it doesn't fit with your narrative.

I'm not talking about presidential candidate, I'm talking about congressional race. The congressional race gap was closed from roughly 20 points to around two from General to special.

Fact.

Keep up.


I've already filled in your lack of knowledge on the turnout.
Way down for Republicans and the same as the General for Democrats. That entirely explains the difference - in fact Tossoff got the same votes as the Democrat in the General election, and no more. All that money and they couldn't save themselves the humiliation of getting no more votes for $20m+

Huge win for Trump in the democrat proclaimed referendum. #winning.


5-0 from the general - hopefully you can keep up with that

edit on 29/6/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

No, you're wrong, the facts show you're wrong, and you can't and won't admit you're wrong.

Carry on.




new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 34  35  36    38  39  40 >>

log in

join