It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bknapple32
a reply to: UKTruth
I prefer my president to not slur insults at people for the whole world to see. If your boss or my boss did that, theyd be fired. I expect some modicum of decorum from the leader of the free world.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: bknapple32
The left isnt outraged at some slight against Mika Brezinsky. Its the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
" But Kathy GRiffen-"
Shes not the president
"Yes but CNN...-"
Again, not the president
"Hillary did-"
Not the president.
"But people in the media say-"
They arent the president
"People can attack Trump on twitter, but he cant-?"
They ARENT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Call me crazy but maybe the outrage is at the man using the office of George Washington, Lincoln, and FDR to personally attack a morning talk show...
What would prefer - a President who throws an insult back at a journalist who insults him or one that spies on and jails journalists they don't like, like Obama? Let me guess, as long as the President is polite, you prefer the latter?
originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: UKTruth
Lol, no pun intended. But you do make a valid point. Those that mock and rock rumors and BS are they themselves being called out by our President, love it.
What, were people expecting a damn king in shiny robes, with a stick up his butt, acting snooty and prestigous? To "LOOK" Presidential? Whats it look like to be "Presidential"? A leader, is all that is required.
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: alphabetaone
Right, because not discussing it is exactly what gave birth to Nazism and fascism...
I always loved the left's logic. Why don't you try and do something productive with your time, instead of fooling yourself into thinking you're somehow stopping a literally new Hitler from ruining the world, by discussing a tweet?
originally posted by: allsee4eye
Isn't personal attack against twitter rules? Low IQ Crazy Mika. That's way over the top. Twitter suspension is warranted in this case.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
originally posted by: UKTruth
He knows things about these people and don't be surprised if he spills a lot more if they keep up their hateful rhetoric... it's great.
Wait, so Trump supporters deny/reject that he tried to threaten or intimidate Comey but they cheer the prospect of Trump threatening/intimidating the free press? Can't have it both ways. Also, truth is now "hateful rhetoric"? Orwell called...he wants his narrative back.
originally posted by: underwerks
Why do we have to support either?
originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: luthier
You don't know him enough, so cut the crap with that failed logic.
Offers up the dirt? Of which the man casted aside his rich and luxurious lifestyle and instead, became a sponge for the hate, vitrol and slander of ignorant leftist liberals and demcrats, that man is certainly strong as any normal person would break down, crying and whining.
It's been proven that he was not making of disabled people and that it was intentionally edited to suit a fake narrative against him, to try and damage Trump's reputation and credibility.
Demeaning women? Only Rossie Odonel, as President Trump likes to say it.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: alphabetaone
Why don't you save the preaching for someone on the left, that wouldn't be me.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: bknapple32
The left isnt outraged at some slight against Mika Brezinsky. Its the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
" But Kathy GRiffen-"
Shes not the president
"Yes but CNN...-"
Again, not the president
"Hillary did-"
Not the president.
"But people in the media say-"
They arent the president
"People can attack Trump on twitter, but he cant-?"
They ARENT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Call me crazy but maybe the outrage is at the man using the office of George Washington, Lincoln, and FDR to personally attack a morning talk show...
What would prefer - a President who throws an insult back at a journalist who insults him or one that spies on and jails journalists they don't like, like Obama? Let me guess, as long as the President is polite, you prefer the latter?
Why do we have to support either?