It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump goes bonkers. Tweets about Psycho Joe and Crazy Mika.

page: 15
43
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: bknapple32
a reply to: UKTruth

I prefer my president to not slur insults at people for the whole world to see. If your boss or my boss did that, theyd be fired. I expect some modicum of decorum from the leader of the free world.


I see, so decorum over all. You'd prefer the President to go after journalists with a smile as he spied on and jailed them.
I'll leave you to that line of thinking and be thankful that Trump is just telling them what he thinks of them.




posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Nikola014

The beauty is you don't get to decide what I am. My voting record speaks for that.

You on the other hand just appear to be a disciple.

Care to talk about the policy he has released?

And your right I shouldn't call myself conservative since those folks are only social conservatives. Something I find that doesn't go well with classical liberal philosophy of people like Jefferson.

Also show me the proof?

Was it from the new breitbart state media dept?


edit on 29-6-2017 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: bknapple32
The left isnt outraged at some slight against Mika Brezinsky. Its the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

" But Kathy GRiffen-"
Shes not the president


"Yes but CNN...-"
Again, not the president


"Hillary did-"
Not the president.



"But people in the media say-"
They arent the president


"People can attack Trump on twitter, but he cant-?"
They ARENT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES



Call me crazy but maybe the outrage is at the man using the office of George Washington, Lincoln, and FDR to personally attack a morning talk show...


What would prefer - a President who throws an insult back at a journalist who insults him or one that spies on and jails journalists they don't like, like Obama? Let me guess, as long as the President is polite, you prefer the latter?


Why do we have to support either?



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Yours is the post of the day.....

Make Meows Great Again!





posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   
Bleeding badly? I don't see any blood.

twitter.com...



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: UKTruth

Lol, no pun intended. But you do make a valid point. Those that mock and rock rumors and BS are they themselves being called out by our President, love it.

What, were people expecting a damn king in shiny robes, with a stick up his butt, acting snooty and prestigous? To "LOOK" Presidential? Whats it look like to be "Presidential"? A leader, is all that is required.




Well said.

I think common sense Americans are sick of the pantywaist do-nothings that talk the talk but have no clue how to walk the walk. Lawyers and community organizers that know how to milk taxpayers and smooth talk their way through eight years is no longer acceptable. They can go write a book and vacation forever for all we care. Good riddance!!

Donald Trump is grades above them. To those accustomed to political-speak and flowery language, President Trump will never be "liked".

The thing is, he doesn't need to be liked by those people. He just needs to do what he promised and MAGA! Those that understand him and his style, don't give a flyin' rat's a$$ what the left thinks. We want...NEED...his leadership. That's it!
edit on 29-6-2017 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: alphabetaone

Right, because not discussing it is exactly what gave birth to Nazism and fascism...


Actually, not discussing it is tantamount to keeping people in a state of oppression, hence the rise of free press.



I always loved the left's logic. Why don't you try and do something productive with your time, instead of fooling yourself into thinking you're somehow stopping a literally new Hitler from ruining the world, by discussing a tweet?


Why don't you save the preaching for someone on the left, that wouldn't be me.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

You don't know him enough, so cut the crap with that failed logic.

Offers up the dirt? Of which the man casted aside his rich and luxurious lifestyle and instead, became a sponge for the hate, vitrol and slander of ignorant leftist liberals and demcrats, that man is certainly strong as any normal person would break down, crying and whining.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:54 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

I mean if you want to keep bringing up Obama, fine. embellish away on it as well.




Again, HES NOT THE PRESIDENT. Trump is.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: allsee4eye
Isn't personal attack against twitter rules? Low IQ Crazy Mika. That's way over the top. Twitter suspension is warranted in this case.



Come on, they don't reeeeally care. I mean ISIS accounts tweet FFS. Twitter thrives on the 2 Minutes of Hate.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack

originally posted by: UKTruth

He knows things about these people and don't be surprised if he spills a lot more if they keep up their hateful rhetoric... it's great.


Wait, so Trump supporters deny/reject that he tried to threaten or intimidate Comey but they cheer the prospect of Trump threatening/intimidating the free press? Can't have it both ways. Also, truth is now "hateful rhetoric"? Orwell called...he wants his narrative back.


Regarding Comey - he said their may be 'tapes'. If that is a threat, it is a threat to tell the truth or he might be exposed as a liar. Call me crazy but I want and expect government officials to tell the truth when under oath so I don't see a problem with that.

Attacking a news commentator for personal attacks against him by personally attacking them back in no way threatens the free press. He did not say I will get the FCC to take away MSNBC's broadcasting license, he did not say don't talk bad about me or else, He just called Joe and Mika names. He is actually endorsing the free press (twitter) by using it to attack them back the same way they have attacked him.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

Why do we have to support either?


He's just trying to insert words you didn't say into your mouth like he does with everyone who disagrees with him. He hasn't actually got a real argument so he resorts to lowball tactics like that.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Arnie123
a reply to: luthier

You don't know him enough, so cut the crap with that failed logic.

Offers up the dirt? Of which the man casted aside his rich and luxurious lifestyle and instead, became a sponge for the hate, vitrol and slander of ignorant leftist liberals and demcrats, that man is certainly strong as any normal person would break down, crying and whining.


Yet all he does is cry and whine about the media and liberals. Interesting.

I think he is a snowflake personally.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:56 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Precisely and there are a lot more of us.

Its comical to watch the lefties melt. ATS has enough tears for an indoor pool and enough ignorance to start a casino, WE WOULD BE RICH.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Nikola014



It's been proven that he was not making of disabled people and that it was intentionally edited to suit a fake narrative against him, to try and damage Trump's reputation and credibility.

Prove it because the videos were not edited.



Demeaning women? Only Rossie Odonel, as President Trump likes to say it.

And you actually believe this lie? The misogynistic pig has done nothing but demean women for years.
Donald Trump sexism tracker: Every offensive comment in one place



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone

a reply to: alphabetaone

Why don't you save the preaching for someone on the left, that wouldn't be me.


It's pointless, they can't fathom that all who disapprove of Trump are not hard core leftists.
edit on 6/29/2017 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

Now we are calling for Twitter suspension.....Hahahahahaha....If that happens he will make his own Twitter and it will be bigger and yuuuuuuuger!



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone

You can discuss it all you want; as a matter of fact, the mainstream media has stopped doing its job and is now only discussing pointless tweets that someone had made.

But don't fool yourself into thinking that you're making any kind of difference, by playing along with the mainstream narrative and critiquing the tweets.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

Yes, a response is required, but as long as we're winning, who cares? He gets his, we laugh at you, the world moves on and America keeps getting GREATER.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: bknapple32
The left isnt outraged at some slight against Mika Brezinsky. Its the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

" But Kathy GRiffen-"
Shes not the president


"Yes but CNN...-"
Again, not the president


"Hillary did-"
Not the president.



"But people in the media say-"
They arent the president


"People can attack Trump on twitter, but he cant-?"
They ARENT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES



Call me crazy but maybe the outrage is at the man using the office of George Washington, Lincoln, and FDR to personally attack a morning talk show...


What would prefer - a President who throws an insult back at a journalist who insults him or one that spies on and jails journalists they don't like, like Obama? Let me guess, as long as the President is polite, you prefer the latter?


Why do we have to support either?

No one is making you do anything (well, except buy insurance, but that is another matter).
I have no problem with anyone hitting back if they are insulted - and the fact the President does it is great. It will give people courage to stand up when they are told what they can say and do by those that want to control others words and deeds.







 
43
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join