It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why are our intelligence agencies actually saying our election was hacked?

page: 3
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001


James Clapper was the Director of National Intelligence. He was the head of "all seventeen" agencies, and spoke for them. James Comey was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which, for better or worse, is our principle counter-espionage agency. He would know.


Once again the entire intent of this topic is, how would he know when he has never been able to examine the evidence?

There is the problem.




posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom


I mean, it should be pretty obvious that it is a lie.


How and why is it "obviously" a lie?

The lie originated from the Clinton campaign, and it serves as justification for the opposition.

The Clinton campaign? Or the Deep State? (Careful, it's a trick question!)



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth


Once again the entire intent of this topic is, how would he know when he has never been able to examine the evidence?


Evidence of what, exactly? I'm sure he trusted the experts at CIA and the NSA who provided him with their reports. He may lack the technical expertise to review all the data collected in cyberspace in its raw form, but that does not invalidate it.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: xstealth


Once again the entire intent of this topic is, how would he know when he has never been able to examine the evidence?


Evidence of what, exactly? I'm sure he trusted the experts at CIA and the NSA who provided him with their reports. He may lack the technical expertise to review all the data collected in cyberspace in its raw form, but that does not invalidate it.


THE SERVER IS THE EVIDENCE.

How can he trust the experts of the CIA or NSA when they haven't even examined the evidence either?



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 01:49 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth


THE SERVER IS THE EVIDENCE.


EVIDENCE OF WHAT? The investigation is not about Hillary Clinton's emails, much as some of you poor Trump followers would like to think it is.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: xstealth


THE SERVER IS THE EVIDENCE.


EVIDENCE OF WHAT? The investigation is not about Hillary Clinton's emails, much as some of you poor Trump followers would like to think it is.


I'm talking about the DNC server, the DNC Leaks by guccifer, which is the excuse they're using for hacking the election.

It's not about HRC's emails or Podesta; this is a separate issue.



posted on Jun, 29 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: xstealth


I'm talking about the DNC server, the DNC Leaks by guccifer, which is the excuse they're using for hacking the election.


Who do you think is hacking the election now?



posted on Jun, 30 2017 @ 12:45 AM
link   
a reply to: kurthall



BS, Even trump is acknowledging we were hacked....So have US intel agencies.

Do you have a reading or comprehension issue? I said

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: xstealth
Hacking the election, and hacking the DNC servers are two totally different things.

Your first source, in the first freaking paragraph says

Intelligence agency leaders repeated their determination Thursday that only "the senior most officials" in Russia could have authorized recent hacks into Democratic National Committee and Clinton officials' emails during the presidential election.



How in the hell you come up with we were not hacked is beyond me!!!!
We are not the DNC or Hillary Clinton and her officials. We were not hacked. They were.



The sand is deep on your beach.

And your head is buried in it.



posted on Jun, 30 2017 @ 05:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Azureblue
a reply to: xstealth

Are they saying who it was hacked by what are the suspected reasons for doing it? Seems to me they just want the pulbic to remember the two key words - Election Hacked. I the this could be described as some kingd of conditioning and mind control.



Yes, madison avenue works, doesn't it?

Billion dollar industry for a reason.

where's the ____?

plop plop fizz fizz.......

russians hacked the _______.

See? Everyone can fill in the blanks.





posted on Jun, 30 2017 @ 05:42 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy


russians hacked the _______.


body of the last Czar to pieces.

Facts trump Madison Avenue.

If Russian agents weren't trying to influence the American election, they were not doing their job. Do you really want them to stand by while a psychotic Globalist rises to power? One who is insanely dedicated to enslaving the Russian people? A psychopath who murders her political enemies in cold blood? A drunkard? A dying old coot who has an army of body doubles? An international child slaver? Killary, the beast of the apocalypse! It was Russia's duty to humanity to stop her. She is pure evil and Putin is the Savior of Mankind for foiling her evil plans! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA!!!!



posted on Jun, 30 2017 @ 05:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: burgerbuddy


russians hacked the _______.


body of the last Czar to pieces.

Facts trump Madison Avenue.

If Russian agents weren't trying to influence the American election, they were not doing their job. Do you really want them to stand by while a psychotic Globalist rises to power? One who is insanely dedicated to enslaving the Russian people? A psychopath who murders her political enemies in cold blood? A drunkard? A dying old coot who has an army of body doubles? An international child slaver? Killary, the beast of the apocalypse! It was Russia's duty to humanity to stop her. She is pure evil and Putin is the Savior of Mankind for foiling her evil plans! MAGA! MAGA! MAGA!!!!



But she won the popular vote!


They failed.



edit on 6 30 2017 by burgerbuddy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2017 @ 06:10 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy


But she won the popular vote!


They failed.


Wrong! As any Trump supporter will tell you until they are blue in the face: this is not a direct democracy. And the Kremlin knows that. What is important is that just enough votes in key "swing states" are affected to give the Electoral College to the chosen candidate. If you deleted a handful of Democratic and Independent voters from the registration lists in every polling place in a swing state.... Mind you, that's not what they did last time, but their exploration of the state databases suggests that is what they may be preparing for next time.

In the last election, all they did was motivate Trump's base of under-informed, frustrated white folks* by circulating lies and propaganda online. You yourself admit the power of advertising. But facts do trump advertising, and when the coal mining jobs don't come back and Medicaid goes away....

*Trump ran on "identity politics": "take our country back from the browns and queers."
edit on 30-6-2017 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join