It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: proximo
BS excuse...
A) van jones never believed the Russia story, they couldn't even find one of him saying he did to pair with the video..
B) they obviously fast forwarded through the question specificly to take him out of context.. over a conspiracy theory he was never pushing anyway....
There is only one place pushing propaganda with this thread and it is the OP....
You know stuff this badly orcastrated makes your side look worse right???
originally posted by: Grambler
Van jones defending Susan Rice unmasking, says at the end trumps team may have been playing footsies with Russia.
Sounds quite different from the guy saying Russia is a nothing burger.
originally posted by: proximo
originally posted by: Grambler
Van jones defending Susan Rice unmasking, says at the end trumps team may have been playing footsies with Russia.
Sounds quite different from the guy saying Russia is a nothing burger.
April 5th.
This is way before the Comey hearing. He very easily could have changed his mind after watching that. Any reasonable person would.
Sorry this does not prove anything.
Show me something in the last week - if you can that will make this Project Veritas video mean a lot.
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: JoshuaCox
your reply is a huge nothing burger.
they don't fast forward - watch more than the first 10 seconds.
VJ was of the stated opinion that the russians hacked our country during the election process.
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: underwerks
if that's the only issue you have with this footage, then i believe you're suffering from a case of disbelief.
i too, would like the unedited raw footage. two things though:
1. in response to part 1, CNN's only position was that the producer "has a difference of opinion."
LOLOL, if that's not a tacit admission of guilt, i don't know what is. if that footage was really, TRULY manipulated, CNN would have simply said what other members are saying here - "PV has a known track record of manipulating the true meaning of someone's words and intentions. this is no different."
2. twisting around someone's words when they're barely known locally is different than twisting around the words of "highly respectable" employees of one of the most watched news networks in the world. forget the foot, PV would be shooting itself in the temple by doing that.
it's either they captured exactly what was said within its context, or they're about to get hit with millions upon millions of dollars worth of defamation/fraudulent misrepresentation lawsuits that will end the organization completely. what do you think? do they seem suicidal to you?
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: underwerks
Forget about this video.
Why did CNN not claim the video yesterday was out of context?
Because it probably wasn't. It was an opinion. As I stated about 400 times in the thread from yesterday.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: underwerks
Forget about this video.
Why did CNN not claim the video yesterday was out of context?
Because it probably wasn't. It was an opinion. As I stated about 400 times in the thread from yesterday.