It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DWS - "At no time was the DNC advised about any Russian intrusion on our network"

page: 1
28

log in

join
share:
+8 more 
posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 04:59 AM
link   
Although this vid is 48hrs old, this is the first I'm hearing of this and it's a humdinger.

She says that at no time did Comey, the FBI, the DHS or anyone contact the DNC about apparent Russian hacking.

This, if true, points the finger back at the IC and deep state as apparently lying - we've all heard Jeh Joohnsons latest testimony where he said the DNC was advised but refused cooperation and didn't turn over the server.

If false, it's Schultz demonstrating her prowess as learned from her mentor - Hillary Clinton.

We are living in the bloody X-Files - this is absolute BS.



Thoughts?
edit on 28-6-2017 by Sublimecraft because: added better vid & Jeh Johnson, not Comey.




posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:05 AM
link   
All very odd and DWS needs to be put under oath.

The IC say they contacted the DNC many times, but the DNC are saying they only contacted some bloke in the data centre (several times).
Someone is not going to come out of this well.

Either
1) DWS is lying
2) the IC are lying
3) The IC are incompetent and so are the DNC.
edit on 28/6/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

Yeah thats a lie by the DNC.

A federal agent is not likely to lie under oath.

Its the DNC modus operandi to not use state resources since it takes the veil off their dealings.

What happened to Clintons home server?

That was compromised and no government authority was given the evidence so as to stop the leak of info from the attack.

We found out about her server thanks to a successful cyber attack on it. It was then bleached....

edit on 6 28 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:07 AM
link   
So who's the bigger liar?Tough choice but I'd go with dws because of the company she's kept.



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

They were never advised of the Russian hacking because the hacking never occurred.

Pretty simple.

edit: Also, what about the news story from May of 2016 where The New York Times said that the DNC was hacked and that the IC believed it to be Russia?

How could DWS not know about it when it was widely circulated by MSM?


edit on 6/28/2017 by ColdWisdom because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:13 AM
link   
Right now, the only function DWS serves, is to cover Hillary's ass, in exchange for...
1: a job.
2 : getting to stay above ground.
edit on 28-6-2017 by DAVID64 because: Do we really have to go through all that? I mean, it's long story and no one reads these anyway.



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: TDawg61
So who's the bigger liar?Tough choice but I'd go with dws because of the company she's kept.

But Wasserman vs The IC on Whoppers? Please. IC hands down and international pimps.



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

now we wait for someone to release // leak the email logs demonstrating that warnings were recieved ?



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Sublimecraft

now we wait for someone to release // leak the email logs demonstrating that warnings were recieved ?


I'm imagining a big bucket of sh!t and folks, blindfolded, hurling it in all directions and CNN is in overdrive and Hillary cackling in the background..

Can't wait for Trumps tweet - it's gonna break twitter.

It's popcorn time.



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:24 AM
link   

edit on CDTWedam3561 by TDawg61 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:44 AM
link   
Schultz ? The best political comedian money could buy ? That Schultz ?



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 07:15 AM
link   
a reply to: tadaman

Jeh Johnson doesn't qualify as a "federal agent" IMO. He's a beaurocrat. And a slimy scumbag too.

But I'd believe him over Schultz.



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 07:30 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

I'm sorry, I can not support CNN no matter how outrageous the story may seem.

True or false, I will not watch or read CNN, the washington post, among many others these days.



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 07:33 AM
link   
DWS on CNN

--impossible for both to be telling truths

--both are having problems with crudibility






posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 08:55 AM
link   


And they blew the three hundred horns, and the LORD set every man's sword a against his fellow, even throughout all the host; and the host fled as far as Beth-#tah toward Zererah, as far as the border of Abel-meholah, by Tabbath.

Judges 7:22





posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 09:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
DWS on CNN

--impossible for both to be telling truths

--both are having problems with crudibility






Ummm...crudibility...

Translation...

They've got the dirt...on each other...



YouSir
edit on 28-6-2017 by YouSir because: I's just hadsta...



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 02:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
All very odd and DWS needs to be put under oath.

The IC say they contacted the DNC many times, but the DNC are saying they only contacted some bloke in the data centre (several times).
Someone is not going to come out of this well.

Either
1) DWS is lying
2) the IC are lying
3) The IC are incompetent and so are the DNC.


I’ll take #3 for $2000 Alex...



posted on Jun, 28 2017 @ 05:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublimecraft

DNC is lying to cover up. Waterboard them.



new topics

top topics



 
28

log in

join