It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: chr0naut
Thanks for the info. Not that it matters,, personally I've never doubted the Gospel accounts. I have been somewhat skeptical of Josephus. Only I guess because I have to wonder if he had to add or subtract stuff for political reasons.
Were there not also secular accounts discussing John the Baptist and his beheading?
So the darkness during the Crucifixion was not an eclipse but Thallus may have been describing events during the Crucifixion.
originally posted by: whereislogic
Cause anyone can make stuff up to promote their latest idea/philosophy, storyline, theosophy or religion, thinking about the Tibetan monks BlissSeeker spoke of, who he/she promoted with his/her comment and thus also their false religion which is part of Babylon the Great.
Oh, and don't take your information about theological or religious matters from the BBC or any other MSM outlet; such as the doumentary that seems to be shown a lot on the National Geographic channel here with Morgan Freeman, promoting almost each and every mainstream false religion within Babylon the Great and promoting almost each and every lie told by these false religions as spiritual knowledge or insight, enlightenment, spirituality, 'special, impressive or admirable', and conditioning people with the notion that they're being openminded if they're willing to fall for them or attribute any value to them regarding the earlier mentioned words such as spirituality, etc. There's nothing insightful, enlightening, spiritual, openminded or admirable about lies and falsehoods, especially when they're about Jesus or his God.
Jesus was way too busy for a trip to the Himalayas, he never went that far. I think Egypt was the furthest away from Israel he has ever been when he walked this earth (but I'd have to check the details in the primary source and cause for anyone having talked about Jesus since the Gospels were written shortly after his death and resurrection, the bible, to be sure, I know he and his parents had to flee to Egypt when Herod wanted Jesus dead and ordered the slaughter of all the boys two years of age and under in Bethlehem and its districts. Sidethought: where were all the Buddhist monks talking about Jesus before they were marketing themselves to what's called 'the West', especially those with lots of money and a spiritual gap or need to fill because of their disappointment with Christendom and/or agnosticism and atheism? They didn't have much to say about Jesus when their target-market didn't want to hear anything about Jesus and still don't have much truthful things to say about him when targetting another market than 'the West' or anyone remotely impressed with the character Jesus, not that they're teaching much truthful things about Jesus when they are targetting those markets either):
originally posted by: AlienVessel
But that is my point. The NT is written by Roman and Greeks generations after Christ walked the earth.
originally posted by: whereislogic
They DID have major justification unto themselves to create a Godhead miracle worker in order to deceive the world - and if you look into history - it worked fantastically for them and the church made a ton of money from innocent people by lying to them for hundreds of years and persecuted anybody who rejected their lies.
The God of Christ is the same God as every living thing. I do not take my information from the media. The media has been aligned with the satanists from the beginning, I even saw a show on TV this morning and just out of my curiosity I decided to look up the content on the net and I found that the TV show COMPLETELY lied to the world. They lie like this to everybody in everything on TV to produce a world of blind ignorants walking around thinking they have knowledge when in reality everything they think they know is all wrong, and we can't blame them entirely for it.
My information comes from the bible, the apocrypha, the Dead Sea scrolls, and from the Aramaic and Hebrew scriptures.
I am not arguing that Christ went to India, from my learning it was the apostle Thomas who went there.
But this is what I am arguing. You cannot rely on the bible for your source of information, unless you can substantiate the information from other historical sources, because I have found the Aramaic documents that some of the NT was based on, and I know for Absolute Fact that you have been lied to in the name of God by complete sinful horrible evil culprits claiming to be apostles and saints when they were really satanists who hated the true followers of Christ.
They made Christ out to be a magician and miracle worker and the reason Why they did that Was To Insult Him. The brother of Christ known as James was murdered when the church started in Jerusalem because these same people stole the church and moved it to Rome. They made you and everybody believe Christ was born of a virgin through a miracle when the Hebrews Did Not Teach That - AND YOU DON'T CARE! In fact and reality that was the PAGAN BELIEFS of their own forefathers that they loved far more than what Christ Taught and what His Followers Believed.
It is so upsetting to know that the early church was corrupted and that all your hopes of a magician walking on water and turning water into wine are not true, but what really hurts me is that the Hebrews Told You Not To Believe In That But You Do Not Listen To Them And Still Betray The Lord By Believing In Those Myths.