It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Project Veritas: CNN Producer Admits Russia Investigation is a Witch Hunt

page: 6
91
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:20 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.




posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:24 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

My, my so a crime committed by someone else becomes a crime committed by the person you really want to have committed it?

Sorry, as much as I might have wanted to find out that Hillary was on the hook for Benghazi, unless there was a clear paper trail leading to Obama, he wasn't going to go down for it to. It was just the scandal that was going to be attached to the term. But that's not a crime Obama would have committed himself.

Same thing here. Even if they catch Carter Page actually colluding in some manner with Russians ... unless there is a very clear and specific chain of evidence that links Trump in, Trump won't go down for it because it can't be proven he had anything to do with the crime.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.

Trump falls under the umbrella of the Trump administration.

Or is he not responsible for how his administration is ran?



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

My, my so a crime committed by someone else becomes a crime committed by the person you really want to have committed it?

Sorry, as much as I might have wanted to find out that Hillary was on the hook for Benghazi, unless there was a clear paper trail leading to Obama, he wasn't going to go down for it to. It was just the scandal that was going to be attached to the term. But that's not a crime Obama would have committed himself.

Same thing here. Even if they catch Carter Page actually colluding in some manner with Russians ... unless there is a very clear and specific chain of evidence that links Trump in, Trump won't go down for it because it can't be proven he had anything to do with the crime.

Impeachment isn't a legal process, it's a political one.

A lot of people seem to forget that. Committing a "crime" has nothing to do with it.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.

Trump falls under the umbrella of the Trump administration.

Or is he not responsible for how his administration is ran?


According to James Comey at least, no it does not. He said over and over and over again that the investigation was into Russia and a few members of Trumps team, but not on Trump himself.

Would you kindly explain to me why you know more than Comey on this matter?



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

My, my so a crime committed by someone else becomes a crime committed by the person you really want to have committed it?

Sorry, as much as I might have wanted to find out that Hillary was on the hook for Benghazi, unless there was a clear paper trail leading to Obama, he wasn't going to go down for it to. It was just the scandal that was going to be attached to the term. But that's not a crime Obama would have committed himself.

Same thing here. Even if they catch Carter Page actually colluding in some manner with Russians ... unless there is a very clear and specific chain of evidence that links Trump in, Trump won't go down for it because it can't be proven he had anything to do with the crime.

Impeachment isn't a legal process, it's a political one.

A lot of people seem to forget that. Committing a "crime" has nothing to do with it.


Holy cow!

Now you bring up impeachment!

Kindly show me where there are impeachment hearings against trump?



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.

Trump falls under the umbrella of the Trump administration.

Or is he not responsible for how his administration is ran?


According to James Comey at least, no it does not. He said over and over and over again that the investigation was into Russia and a few members of Trumps team, but not on Trump himself.

Would you kindly explain to me why you know more than Comey on this matter?

In that investigation, yes.

What about the others? Was Comey referring to the ones he isn't involved in as well?



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   
Honestly, it seems that there are always going to be those morons that just can't accept that this whole Russia thing has been a steaming load of crap.

They will sit in their safe spaces conjuring up reasons why the "conservatards" are obviously wrong and that this is all just fabricated by people desperate to believe Trump isn't a gay bashing, muslim hating tyrant!

At least most of the conspiracy theories we anti Obama folks had ended up being true



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

My, my so a crime committed by someone else becomes a crime committed by the person you really want to have committed it?

Sorry, as much as I might have wanted to find out that Hillary was on the hook for Benghazi, unless there was a clear paper trail leading to Obama, he wasn't going to go down for it to. It was just the scandal that was going to be attached to the term. But that's not a crime Obama would have committed himself.

Same thing here. Even if they catch Carter Page actually colluding in some manner with Russians ... unless there is a very clear and specific chain of evidence that links Trump in, Trump won't go down for it because it can't be proven he had anything to do with the crime.

Impeachment isn't a legal process, it's a political one.

A lot of people seem to forget that. Committing a "crime" has nothing to do with it.


Holy cow!

Now you bring up impeachment!

Kindly show me where there are impeachment hearings against trump?

Actually, the poster I was replying to brought it up. Unless "bringing Trump down" means something else.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kantzveldt
Careful guys the Russians may be behind this attempt to subvert the glorious American MSM..



Wow. This is just incredible.

First of all, they contradict themselves in the very beginning by stating that the video is fake, but then in the same sentence they go onto say it allegedly represents one of their producers. Then they say his opinions are misconstrued by heavily edited footage.

If the video is fake, then how did one of their producers end up in the video? Obviously it is in fact one of their producers in the video, otherwise they would have no need to mention that the video is edited, they could have covered all their bases up front when they said the video is fake.

This is the level of incompetence we are dealing with.

And then... No sh!t, they actually claim that Veritas is part of an attack on CNN by the Kremlin. We have to take note of the irony that the video they are vilifying is of one of their producers admitting that the Russian investigation is a witch hunt.

They've even expanded the lie from it's known state of 17 agencies to 18 agencies, but fail to mention which agency is the 18th, let alone 1-17.

If anyone is looking for evidence of CNN's demise, look no further than this sad and sorry press release.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.

Trump falls under the umbrella of the Trump administration.

Or is he not responsible for how his administration is ran?


According to James Comey at least, no it does not. He said over and over and over again that the investigation was into Russia and a few members of Trumps team, but not on Trump himself.

Would you kindly explain to me why you know more than Comey on this matter?

In that investigation, yes.

What about the others? Was Comey referring to the ones he isn't involved in as well?


This is incredibly frustrating.

Ok, the FBI had an investigation going on into Trump team. CNN and most other MSM media outlets said this meant that Trump was personally under investigation. Comey kindly let them know they were wrong.

Now that this has been debunked, you just jump right onto the next bandwagon, and are now claiming the exact same thing, that the other investigations into Trump team must also be investigations into him personally.

Everyone, and I do mean everyone who is reading this can see how foolish this makes you look.

You just assume Trump is personally under investigation until someone can prove to you he isn't.

The burden of proof is on you.

Post me one source that claims Trump is personally under investigation for Russian collusion.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

I think that that CNN memo was a parody.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

You do realize their are zero sources for that CNN "press release".

Including CNN itself.




posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

I think that is fake. I will be honest I thought it was real being that its the exact stance taken on the podesta wiki leaks files. Its based on ACTUAL recent history.

It is the funniest thing I heard about this. It may even be true for all we can expect of CNN.

LOL.

edit on 6 27 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:52 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Still grasping straws 🙄

The legacy media colluded with the IC, there would have been leaks.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.

Trump falls under the umbrella of the Trump administration.

Or is he not responsible for how his administration is ran?


According to James Comey at least, no it does not. He said over and over and over again that the investigation was into Russia and a few members of Trumps team, but not on Trump himself.

Would you kindly explain to me why you know more than Comey on this matter?

In that investigation, yes.

What about the others? Was Comey referring to the ones he isn't involved in as well?


This is incredibly frustrating.

Ok, the FBI had an investigation going on into Trump team. CNN and most other MSM media outlets said this meant that Trump was personally under investigation. Comey kindly let them know they were wrong.

Now that this has been debunked, you just jump right onto the next bandwagon, and are now claiming the exact same thing, that the other investigations into Trump team must also be investigations into him personally.

Everyone, and I do mean everyone who is reading this can see how foolish this makes you look.

You just assume Trump is personally under investigation until someone can prove to you he isn't.

The burden of proof is on you.

Post me one source that claims Trump is personally under investigation for Russian collusion.

My issue is that for some reason you assume that since Comey said Trump wasn't under investigation, that applies to the other investigations going on. When Comey has nothing to do with those investigations.

The Trump administration being under investigation puts Trump under investigation by default, unless he isn't part of that administration.

Using your thinking on this, if the Obama administration came under investigation for shady deals, that surely means Obama wouldn't be involved, right?



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.

Trump falls under the umbrella of the Trump administration.

Or is he not responsible for how his administration is ran?


According to James Comey at least, no it does not. He said over and over and over again that the investigation was into Russia and a few members of Trumps team, but not on Trump himself.

Would you kindly explain to me why you know more than Comey on this matter?

In that investigation, yes.

What about the others? Was Comey referring to the ones he isn't involved in as well?


This is incredibly frustrating.

Ok, the FBI had an investigation going on into Trump team. CNN and most other MSM media outlets said this meant that Trump was personally under investigation. Comey kindly let them know they were wrong.

Now that this has been debunked, you just jump right onto the next bandwagon, and are now claiming the exact same thing, that the other investigations into Trump team must also be investigations into him personally.

Everyone, and I do mean everyone who is reading this can see how foolish this makes you look.

You just assume Trump is personally under investigation until someone can prove to you he isn't.

The burden of proof is on you.

Post me one source that claims Trump is personally under investigation for Russian collusion.

My issue is that for some reason you assume that since Comey said Trump wasn't under investigation, that applies to the other investigations going on. When Comey has nothing to do with those investigations.

The Trump administration being under investigation puts Trump under investigation by default, unless he isn't part of that administration.

Using your thinking on this, if the Obama administration came under investigation for shady deals, that surely means Obama wouldn't be involved, right?


Was the FBI investigating the Trump administration for possible Russian collusion?

Did Comey admit that despite this, Trump wasn't personally under investigation?

End of argument.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Well, that explains why the GOP is being called a terrorist organization over the healthcare bill now. Bye bye Russia witch hunt, hello healthcare witch hunt.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: underwerks

No, no, not pbstruction of justice, collusion with Russia. Those are different things.

Trump falls under the umbrella of the Trump administration.

Or is he not responsible for how his administration is ran?


According to James Comey at least, no it does not. He said over and over and over again that the investigation was into Russia and a few members of Trumps team, but not on Trump himself.

Would you kindly explain to me why you know more than Comey on this matter?

In that investigation, yes.

What about the others? Was Comey referring to the ones he isn't involved in as well?


This is incredibly frustrating.

Ok, the FBI had an investigation going on into Trump team. CNN and most other MSM media outlets said this meant that Trump was personally under investigation. Comey kindly let them know they were wrong.

Now that this has been debunked, you just jump right onto the next bandwagon, and are now claiming the exact same thing, that the other investigations into Trump team must also be investigations into him personally.

Everyone, and I do mean everyone who is reading this can see how foolish this makes you look.

You just assume Trump is personally under investigation until someone can prove to you he isn't.

The burden of proof is on you.

Post me one source that claims Trump is personally under investigation for Russian collusion.

My issue is that for some reason you assume that since Comey said Trump wasn't under investigation, that applies to the other investigations going on. When Comey has nothing to do with those investigations.

The Trump administration being under investigation puts Trump under investigation by default, unless he isn't part of that administration.

Using your thinking on this, if the Obama administration came under investigation for shady deals, that surely means Obama wouldn't be involved, right?


Was the FBI investigating the Trump administration for possible Russian collusion?

Did Comey admit that despite this, Trump wasn't personally under investigation?

End of argument.

Yes, you're right about that investigation. But that says nothing of the other investigations.

Which are the ones I'm talking about.



posted on Jun, 27 2017 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

How can you tell?




top topics



 
91
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join