Doesn't it seem like under the fuselage would be better than under the wing if you wanted to protect the device from down wash? Just my thought, I'm
guessing that they hit the target the down wash problem is either not very big or is non existent. Love how WIB sensationalized the story thought..
Burning people alive walking down the street.. Wow.
The problem is the beam, not the device. The prop wash will throw up dust and crud. That is an issue, to say the least, for a beam weapon. Whether
its under the fuselage or on a pylon won't matter.
Or you could focus on the "more important helos" and "since Bush" bits.
There have been rumours on here and elsewhere about "upgrades" if memory serves...
Between all of the extra electronics and electronic defense tech on those special service helos already I can't see them having too much excess power
generation for a weaponized laser.
They want the tech but are worried about the legalities. This happened with missiles fired from drones during the Clinton administration and is why
the Predator didn't get the Hellfire until much later than it ought.
Aside from the lack of Pew Pew Pew what about the fricken green beam to let everyone know its shooting.
Russia and China will obviously have Red beams, and the UN will have Blue ones.
Imagine sitting there with your Jihadi friends discussing the next planned atrocity on the West and Mohammedan just vaporizes next to you followed by
Mohammedan 2 and Mohammedan-Junior. They leave you to tell the other Mo's that thinking Jihadi thoughts gets you vaporised, it must be against Allah's
will and they all come to the party!
Go team America, bringing peace to the Middle East one wonder weapon at a time!