It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
I'm not gonna get into anything political here..just post what should be obvious and common knowledge..
So in reality without any political bias.. how do we know what news organizations are "real" and which ones are "fake" news???
Well obviously you need accountability... So..
1) have they ever fired someone for publishing a fake or falsified story???
Any news organization that has never fired someone for publishing a fake story.. either isn't checking up on them, or doesn't care if they lie.. far more focused on traffic than accuracy....
2) do they have salaried teams of investigative journalists??
If not then how are they even breaking blockbuster stories???
3) Are they just a compilation site??
Compilation sites do not have teams of journalists researching stories. They copy paste MSM stories and put their own spin on them..
Which in most cases is just ridiculous..
How do you only have the data provided by the msm story, and yet literally come to the opposite conclusion??
They weren't the ones who interviewed the primaries or spent months researching the story...
They just read their article and rewrote it with their own personal spin..
So if a news source doesn't have those things...you can probably bet they are not a real news organization.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Bone75
That's intelligent...
Listens to people who don't even have journalists insteadas long as they don't use certain words...
You truely do not know how ridiculous that is and sounds???
No matter the words..