It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Vladimir Putin gave direct instructions to help elect Trump, report says

page: 4
36
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: amfirst1
a reply to: DanteGaland

So you mean Putin directed Sputnik and RT to help Trump which no one really watches compared to Hilary who got the Vatican Bank Pope, EU Bankers, UN, Obama, Neocons, Democrats, BBC, CNN, NBC, ABC, Mexico, Canado, All of Europe, China, etc etc etc. The real collusion it seems to be with Hilary and every other country not named Russia.


RT is fairly popular here!

...

It didn't USED to be...




posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Thank you. Very interesting read.

I was hoping by now that this entire Russia stuff would have been done and settled, so we could move on, but it seems to just keep growing.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jiggly
a reply to: Shamrock6

see.. this is the problem... they keep saying " oh we have this and have that " yet they sit on it?

yeah ok


TPTB and the establishment seem to be exhausting any and every possible way they can attack the sitting President, with unfounded claims.

If they have evidence and he has done wrong, the authorities should take immediate and swift action to hold him accountable and restore faith in our Executive office. But so far, it's just been constant finger pointing, accusing, and turning the public against one another (very successfully), while the corrupt on top continue to exploit the working masses and try to start some more wars for profit. Psychopaths are running the planet.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Here's a GOLD MINE for those who want "SOURCE MATERIAL"

Actual documents from the US Gov. The Washington Post is making their SOURCE material available:

Read documents related to Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:23 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Of course it's growing. That's so you'll blindly accept world war. Working nicely.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:24 PM
link   
Do we have direct evidence of Vlads operatives sitting down with Trump and any of his team to discuss executing these instructions?

If so, that would be a game changer.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:27 PM
link   
THIS is the kind of stuff the Trump fanatics don't read...



The declassified 14-page report, which was released in January, concluded Russian President Vladi­mir Putin ordered the effort to undermine faith in the U.S. presidential election and helped Trump win the White House.




Read the declassified report on Russian interference in the U.S. election



edit on 23-6-2017 by DanteGaland because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: introvert

Of course it's growing. That's so you'll blindly accept world war. Working nicely.


I don't think war will come of this. If it does, I would not blindly accept it.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: introvert

Of course it's growing. That's so you'll blindly accept world war. Working nicely.


I don't think war will come of this. If it does, I would not blindly accept it.



Russians have been doing this for decades. Obama didn't think they were powerful enough to prevent queen pantsuit from taking her throne. Another Democrat miscalculation.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:32 PM
link   
a reply to: DanteGaland

I have to ask...

What's with all the caps-locking, italicizing, bolding, etc.?

Seems very....propaganda-ish.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: The GUT
a reply to: introvert

Of course it's growing. That's so you'll blindly accept world war. Working nicely.


I don't think war will come of this. If it does, I would not blindly accept it.



Russians have been doing this for decades. Obama didn't think they were powerful enough to prevent queen pantsuit from taking her throne. Another Democrat miscalculation.


Are you admitting Russia helped Trump in stopping Hillary?



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:34 PM
link   
THIS one is a DECLASSIFIED report titled:

Joint Statement for the Record
to the
Senate Armed Services Committee
Foreign Cyber Threats to the United States




The statement was released on the day of Senate hearings regarding the Russian cyber threat and interference in the 2016 election. Top U.S. intelligence official: Russia meddled in 2016 election through hacking and spreading of propaganda




Read the joint statement by top U.S. officials on foreign cyber threats


edit on 23-6-2017 by DanteGaland because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: stosh64

Lmao. Fine, if you say that you never said that, I'll take you at your word and apologize for implying otherwise.

However, let's not pretend that it's a hasty generalization of Trump supporters. It would be tantamount to saying that it was a hasty generalization of Trump supporters to say that many have called for Hillary Clinton to be "locked up" or called for a wall to be built on the border with Mexico.

That's simply feigned outrage on your part ot distract from the point and the point stands.

But if it makes you feel better, I'll play along and rephrase my statements so that you can respond to my point instead of nitpicking my choice in determiners.

Donald Trump was critical of Obama for not using the phrase "radical Islamic terrorism" when addressing acts of terror committed by radical Muslims.

Many of Donald Trump's supporters echoed this criticism. Prior to the Donald Trump campaign, it was a popular sentiment among those identifying as "conservative" that by not using the phrase "radical Islamic terrorism" was somehow "emboldening" terrorists. It was also claimed by many in this particular demographic that by not saying, "radical islamic terrorism," the then President was hampering efforts to fight terrorism.

Will you stipulate the veracity of those statements or do I need to send it off to a lawyer for another rewrite?

Assuming this meets your rigorous standards for a lively Mud Pit discussion, if you would be so kind, I have three questions that I'd like for you to answer.

1. Do you believe that Obama was either emboldening terrorists or thwarting the US attempts at fighting terrorism by not using the phrase "radical Islamic terrorism?"

2. Do you believe that by not decisively acknowledging even the existence of a these election meddling efforts, let alone their source, President Trump is in anyway emboldening the perpetrators and thwarting efforts to prevent future attacks?

3. Do you believe that people who answer "yes" to the first question should answer "yes" to the second?


edit on 2017-6-23 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Do you think our foreign policy is just? Have you done any research on our "national security state? Are you aware of the empirical fact that our CIA lies to forward this agenda? Are you paying attention to the world stage or just lapping up whatever the weaponized media is feeding you? Do you think we're in the ME because we want to bring them freedom?

Does any of that bother you or are you just interested in Trump porn?



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: DanteGaland

I have to ask...

What's with all the caps-locking, italicizing, bolding, etc.?

Seems very....propaganda-ish.


I would add "hysterical" to that.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:40 PM
link   
The US has two fifths of the richest corporations among the top 50 in the world and over half of the most valuable
( stock value)corporations among the top 100 in the world.

Russia has not one company even on any of those categories.

Go check it out, and you’ll be amazed at the wealth of America and the relative poverty of Russia in comparison.

My point is the US, and rightly so, thinks it’s top dog on the earth, China is slowly catching up, but not yet.

What’s going to happen is the US will attack Russia through economic means, I HOPE.

Because Russia has 8000 nuclear weapons and the US 7300, so their equal to the US in that regard.

edit on 23-6-2017 by Willtell because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Just take a look at his thread history and posting history and you'll have your answer.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:44 PM
link   
THIS one is great great to...:



LINK to report



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland
THIS is the kind of stuff the Trump fanatics don't read...



The declassified 14-page report, which was released in January, concluded Russian President Vladi­mir Putin ordered the effort to undermine faith in the U.S. presidential election and helped Trump win the White House.




Read the declassified report on Russian interference in the U.S. election




Ah, just as I thought - nothing at all

Nothing, not here, nor in the next post you've made either.

No evidence linking Trump to Vladimir - nada, zip, zilch, zero, nil.



posted on Jun, 23 2017 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Do you think that the Russian foreign policy is just? Have you done any research into the Russian "security state," of which Vladimir Putin is a product? Are you aware that the SVR lies to forward its agenda?

More importantly, do you think that the Russian foreign policy furthers an agenda that is positive, negative or neutral to the interests of the United States, it citizens and our allies?

Have you done any research at all into Russia's geopolitical agenda?

Does any of that bother you or are you just interested in defending Trump putting concern over the optics of the election and his fragile ego ahead of concerns for our national security?



new topics

top topics



 
36
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join